Two differences in the Dana Bash interviews

Come on. There's a valid conversation going on about the two interviews. Let's don't turn every thread into Trump's morality.

 

It's just pretty hard to drum up sympathy for that poor old Vance guy when he he wants to criticize Walz' interactions with his wife, while totally ignoring....

.....well, you know.

And it does address OP's concern. The proper response to OP is : "Vance is a total hypocrite and deserves to be treated as such. That's not "bias."

 

Ding, ding, ding. I am so weary of reading his scolds - i just scroll on by anymore. Nothing contributed and nothing is expected any longer. My wife fulfills my daily recommended amount of bitching.

 

This.

Although I'm merely amused by it, at this point.

"You think you're so much; 'holier than thou' just because you don't support a convicted felon rapist who tried to criminally overturn an election!!"

Well.....yes. Exactly.

 

Do the offenders ever feel like not offending? See above.

 

I'll give Bash credit for asking a surprising number of tough questions. I was a little too hard on her in a previous post.

On X (twitter) it's being said that Kamala was wearing an earpiece that fed her answers during the interview. It has also been said the interview was paused to let Kamala receive info on what to say (through her earpiece) before the interview continued. I have no idea if this happened but if it did it would not be a surprise

 

On Twitter it's also being said that John F Kennedy Sr is really president and that the democrats are a race of lizard-brained people. Or something

 

If CNN was going to conclude to that extent why would she have needed an earpiece?

 

I don't know if Kamala used an earpiece. There are who think she did but my vision is too poor t make that determination from the video that has been oist3d.

 

Sounds like your common sense is worse than your vision