Tulsi Gabbard leaving democratic party

I shouldnt have quoted you. Yours isnt the only such reference in this thread

 

Feels relevant

 

Mine was not adopting the sentiment but mocking it as inappropriate. So was wpb’s

 

She’s a part of the very global elite she speaks off. She’s a Trojan horse.

 

Something about her no longer being able to stomach the ‘elite cabal of warmongers’ in the party.

Do tell.

 

The video is not tho. To the best of my knowledge shes still a part of the WEF. I did see where see called out Davous and WEF, so I’ll dig some more. No way I trust anyone who’s a part of the WEF, after watching the Video. Globalism is a real thing, IMO.

Edit: yep, she’s still a member.
Gabbard did not explain how her protest squares with her WEF membership as a Young Global Leader, as pointed out by many in comments to her post.

May, 2022
Tulsi Gabbard On WEF 'Great Reset' Agenda: 'Must Be Condemned By Us All' - American Faith

 

We haven’t wanted her for years. Hell, the joke 3 years ago was how diverse the Democrat primary field was … so many men and women of different races, religions, sexual orientation… and even a Republican lady from Hawaii…

 

Ok. Just so we are clear. Jokes "mocking" Dems wanting to huggy squeezy with AOC are fair game and not sexist?

 

Well excuse me. Nobody let me in on your libbie inside joke.

 

Do I have to diagram this?

Chris Cilizza is famous for trolling Dems with how they are out of touch and behind on some issues that Rs are more in touch with the common voter on.

Doug J. Balloon is literally mocking that someone like Cilizza (that's part of the joke) is going to tell Dems that they need to recruit some female candidate, emphasizing sexualization, to replace Gabbard, and that Dems are out of touch if they don't.

He is literally making the opposite point

 

Ok, so what about this post is things I can do that alphabet people can't?

Children with psychological issues should be referred to psychologists, but children lack many rights that adults have so again what can't they do that any other child can?

Extending regulations to require accomodations of someone's preference isn't a right, and not extending to everyone means that everyone has the same rights. If you want to debate whether gay marriage is cool or not (personally I don't care who anyone marrys) you should start on solid intellectual ground, beginning with the acknowledgement that everyone has the same marriage rights. Now, should those rights be expanded for everyone? I'd agree with that.

You'd be surprised how many things we likely agree on if you simply use facts and logic, not appeals to emotion and similar tactics.

 

I answered your question directly. You have followed up with multiple questions that indicate you're either pretending to not understand or not reading what I told you. In either case, it's not worth my time to continue engaging with you.

 

He doesn’t. There is more evidence that Brandon is a Chinese asset but they’ll defend it endlessly.

 

Indeed that is your view. What I am saying is that for any view there are people who probably find them unacceptable. There is probably some democrat out there that would say that anyone with your views can leave the Democratic Party. If each person has a different level of tolerance, why should we privilege your particular tastes as the ultimate measure of who should be allowed to remain in the party?

 

Can you leave something you never were a part of?

 

There are a whole lot more people in the Democratic Party who are for LGBTQ rights than there are people who are against LGBTQ rights.

 

Certainly. But what of someone who thinks that gator lawyer doesn’t go far enough pushing these rights? Should lawyer be removed from the party? At what exact point should he be removed?

Again, I don’t really care about Gabbard in particular. I just want to make sure that there is still space for free thought in the party.

 

You got me, just like here. The way people use labels.