Welcome home, fellow Gator.

The Gator Nation's oldest and most active insider community
Join today!

Trump's Troubles

Discussion in 'Too Hot for Swamp Gas' started by G8trGr8t, Feb 13, 2021.

  1. channingcrowderhungry

    channingcrowderhungry Premium Member

    8,983
    2,017
    3,013
    Apr 3, 2007
    Bottom of a pint glass
    Yeah it didn't have enough grammatical errors to actually be from Trump
     
    • Funny Funny x 1
  2. jjgator55

    jjgator55 VIP Member

    6,198
    1,765
    2,043
    Apr 3, 2007
    Based on what?
     
    • Dislike Dislike x 1
  3. enviroGator

    enviroGator GC Hall of Fame

    5,532
    765
    368
    Apr 12, 2007
    Twitter.
     
  4. rivergator

    rivergator Too Hot Mod Moderator VIP Member

    35,438
    1,758
    2,258
    Apr 8, 2007
    I didn't see a news story on this, and I'm pretty it'd make the news. doesn't seem real.
     
  5. citygator

    citygator VIP Member

    11,502
    2,544
    3,303
    Apr 3, 2007
    Charlotte
    He hasn’t tweeted since 2021 from that account. Unless that’s truthpsycho or whatever.
     
  6. G8trGr8t

    G8trGr8t Premium Member

    31,505
    12,052
    3,693
    Aug 26, 2008
    Trump Hotels accountant admits 'overstating' when he said company had $290 million in cash (msn.com)

    Mark Hawthorn, the chief accounting officer of the Trump Hotels division of the Trump Organization, testified at former President Donald Trump's civil fraud trial in New York that he "overstated" the value of the company's assets in 2018, reported ABC News on Monday.

    According to the report, when a third-party accounting agency asked for the total amount of Trump's liquid assets, "Hawthorn said he consulted the financial statement that listed 'cash equivalents in excess of $290 million'." But New York Attorney General Letitia James alleges that 30 percent of those liquid assets were actually owned by Vornado Partnerships, a company with whom Trump had a partnership interest but was distinct from the Trump Organization, which was not disclosed on the statement.

    "It appears to have been overstated," Hawthorn admitted, adding that he had only viewed the statement once during a 20-minute session on Google Meet and hadn't examined it closely.
     
    • Informative Informative x 1
  7. ursidman

    ursidman VIP Member

    14,057
    22,594
    3,348
    Sep 27, 2007
    Bug Tussle NC
    Biden now has an account on Truth Social. Going to be interesting.
     
    • Funny Funny x 2
  8. G8trGr8t

    G8trGr8t Premium Member

    31,505
    12,052
    3,693
    Aug 26, 2008
    Cannon going off the rails again. Scolds Smith for not providing a SCIF that is convenient to the defense

    "Shouldn't we refer to her as Trump defense counsel?": Experts slam Cannon order scolding Jack Smith (msn.com)

    U.S. District Court Judge Aileen Cannon, who is presiding over former President Donald Trump's classified documents case in Florida, issued an order to special counsel Jack Smith's office Tuesday scolding the prosecutors for not providing access to classified materials to the defense in an "accredited facility" within the Southern District of Florida, MSNBC's Katie Phang reports. The order follows the prosecution and defense's squabble this week over the case's discovery process, during which both parties exchange records about witnesses and evidence they may present at trial, according to The Messenger.

    In a Sunday night filing, Trump's attorneys said Smith's office had not yet made around 2,400 pages of classified discovery available for review in the district and asked for an extension to file additional motions. Prosecutors, who have provided over 1.3 million pages of unclassified records in the case, partially objected to the extension request Tuesday. While they did not reject a 10-day extension regarding classified records, of which the case involves thousands of pages, they did oppose any motion to extend deadlines for unclassified discovery motions.

    Experts criticized Cannon's order online. "Shouldn’t we just refer to her as Trump defense counsel Cannon?" Norman Ornstein, an emeritus scholar at the American Enterprise Institute, said on X, formerly Twitter. "I'm trying to think of a single time in a case involving classified information that my convenience or proximity to access to the relevant [sensitive compartmented information facility] was a consideration," national security lawyer Bradley Moss added. Phang pointed out that Cannon also recently scolded a prosecutor on Smith's team in Trump co-defendant Walt Nauta's contentious conflict-of-interest
     
    • Informative Informative x 2
  9. mrhansduck

    mrhansduck GC Hall of Fame

    4,790
    994
    1,788
    Nov 23, 2021
    • Informative Informative x 2
  10. jhenderson251

    jhenderson251 Premium Member

    3,383
    552
    2,043
    Aug 7, 2008
    [​IMG]
     
    • Funny Funny x 10
  11. sierragator

    sierragator GC Hall of Fame

    15,296
    13,209
    1,853
    Apr 8, 2007
    So what's the over/under on when Cannon throws the matter out?
     
  12. PITBOSS

    PITBOSS GC Hall of Fame

    7,732
    811
    558
    Apr 13, 2007
     
  13. tampagtr

    tampagtr VIP Member

    17,561
    2,791
    1,618
    Apr 3, 2007
    I know this is legalistic of interest primarily to lawyers, but it astounds me that Cannon acts like the Government is harassing by bringing up the conflict of interest issue. It's obvious and overwhelming!! She can only be protecting a corrupt defense strategy

     
  14. BLING

    BLING GC Hall of Fame

    8,800
    862
    2,843
    Apr 16, 2007
    • Informative Informative x 6
    • Like Like x 3
  15. VAg8r1

    VAg8r1 GC Hall of Fame

    20,867
    1,735
    1,763
    Apr 8, 2007
    • Fistbump/Thanks! Fistbump/Thanks! x 1
    • Winner Winner x 1
  16. BLING

    BLING GC Hall of Fame

    8,800
    862
    2,843
    Apr 16, 2007
    The question now is how many rats jump off this ship (the GA case with, what, 17 defendants?). Might not be such a sprawling RICO case by the time it gets to trial…
     
  17. AndyGator

    AndyGator VIP Member

    3,598
    352
    338
    Apr 10, 2007
    I believe that was both the intent and the expectation.
     
    • Agree Agree x 1
    • Winner Winner x 1
  18. G8tas

    G8tas GC Hall of Fame

    4,499
    908
    453
    Sep 22, 2008
    • Funny Funny x 2
    • Like Like x 1
  19. G8trGr8t

    G8trGr8t Premium Member

    31,505
    12,052
    3,693
    Aug 26, 2008
    • Funny Funny x 1
  20. G8trGr8t

    G8trGr8t Premium Member

    31,505
    12,052
    3,693
    Aug 26, 2008
    would him threatening her violate his gag order in the NY case? Will every judge sans Cannon be imposing separate gag orders on him?