Trump's plan for mass deportations

Cool.

I notice you didn't mention any dipshittery about deporting 8-9 million people. Sounds like we are actually in total agreement.

Too bad you didn't have any principles about presidential candidates repeatedly just telling racist lies instead of specifying their plan for, and I quote YOU here; "implementing a visa program that brings in sufficient workers as needed, and then ensure that they leave seasonally or transition to another seasonal job."

 

No they're not.

How 'bout the Rapist Party talk about an improved visa program instead of just babbling about deporting people?

 

You really believe most are working? How bout we enforce our work visa programs. Nope. Not what the dims want to do. They're pushing the open border for the reason I stated.

 

You notice that you've been conned yet?

In your own words, the solution is : "implementing a visa program that brings in sufficient workers as needed, and then ensure that they leave seasonally or transition to another seasonal job."

But all you got is a make-up and bra-wearing criminal babbling about deporting people, without proposing the slightest elements of a solution.

Conned.

 

Illegal migrants. You can't type it, can you.

 

Let me tell you what I posted on FB in 2016 after Trump was elected: (paraphrase)

I didn't vote for Trump to be my leader or my savior.

He's a brick I'm picking up to throw through the window of the political and bureaucratic class.

He's stlll an effective brick. Actually, he appears to be a much better brick this time around.

You'll figure it out eventually. Or not.

 

I can type it. Watch : illegal immigrants.

Your turn now. Do : Felon Trump.

 

Given that most of them are here with asylum requests, typing that out would make your sentence factually incorrect. People applying for asylum are here legally.

 

I can definitely understand why you see that.

Why on the immigration issue, instead of proposing, in your words, a plan for "implementing a visa program that brings in sufficient workers as needed, and then ensure that they leave seasonally or transition to another seasonal job"

....... he just babbles about (expensively) deporting people.

Imagine being a grown adult and thinking that that's effective.

 

If there's no one left to work, as you claimed, both sides will have to do just that. Good luck getting the dems on board, though, as they've already shown how they feel about securing the border.

 

You want him to be a brick through the bureaucratic class. And your goal is for him to massively increase the bureaucracy to have big government more tightly control immigration? Seems counterproductive.

 

sorry, I don't control what he does or says

I don't care about the brick.

I just want the window broken.

 

The answer is a guest worker program that allows supply of labor to meet demand legally. Immigrants here working already and new arrivals would sign up to become legal. It would give them protections, including alleviating fear they might get deported for just being here. Eliminating the issue of migrants too scared to work.

Have a time limit on the visa and when it's up, either return home or get in a citizenship pathway. This is basically the Gang of 8 plan.

If we just charged just $5/week, 8 million undocumented workers paying would generate $2 billion in tax revenues. We could use this money to enforce those on worker visas are actually working, and process new entrants.

 

You don't know WTH they are or why they're here. That's the point!

 

there are a handful of fundamental things a government needs to do effectively

controlling borders and immigration are two of those things

 

If that's how you justify incompetence, then that is your choice.

I'm still intensely curious about how Incompetent Don plans to offset the loss of workers, should he actually deport 8-9 million employed undocumented persons.

It's nice to know, at least, that you won't care, because - yay!!! the window's broken!!

 

When has the US ever controlled our Southern border with Mexico? The answer is never. The best we ever did was during the Bracero Program years, because most entered legally.

 

Ever feel like you're debating children?

 

We actually have a pretty good idea of who they are and why they are here. It is interesting that you don't think that researchers can easily find out information about people.

 

Maybe junior high students who haven't learned American History yet?