Welcome home, fellow Gator.

The Gator Nation's oldest and most active insider community
Join today!

Trump vs. Harris - Please put all new polls here.

Discussion in 'Too Hot for Swamp Gas' started by rivergator, Jul 24, 2024.

  1. GatorRade

    GatorRade Rad Scientist

    8,621
    1,606
    1,478
    Apr 3, 2007
    Holy cow, that’s pretty bad. At least if the numbers implied by my internal polling of my own opinion are correct.
     
  2. okeechobee

    okeechobee GC Hall of Fame

    9,361
    1,188
    328
    Sep 11, 2022
    Probably because they’re choosing not to include Rasmussen. They have definitely performed better than many of the polls you see every day.
     
    • Funny Funny x 4
  3. VAg8r1

    VAg8r1 GC Hall of Fame

    20,703
    1,704
    1,763
    Apr 8, 2007
    Although that poll was released today, it's based on sampling entirely prior to the debate. I would also add the Mary Washington University poll also included RFK, Jr. I'm not even sure if he is still on the ballot in Virginia. These polls in which the respondents were sampled partially or entirely (the Morning Consult poll) following the debate are probably much more accurate.
    upload_2024-9-20_11-35-53.png

    I would add that one of the ways that 538 is a more accurate site than RCP is that order in which the respective websites display the results of polls. 538 displays the results of polls based on the order of sampling with the most recently sampled polls listed first. RCP displays polls in the order that they were released which occasionally results in older polls that were more recently released being listed ahead of the most recently sampled polls.
     
    Last edited: Sep 20, 2024
    • Informative Informative x 1
  4. G8tas

    G8tas GC Hall of Fame

    4,461
    902
    453
    Sep 22, 2008
    Saying Rasmussen performed better than many polls is like saying the gators are performing better than many teams
     
    • Funny Funny x 4
    • Agree Agree x 1
  5. VAg8r1

    VAg8r1 GC Hall of Fame

    20,703
    1,704
    1,763
    Apr 8, 2007
    They did outperform Samford.
     
    Last edited: Sep 20, 2024
  6. citygator

    citygator VIP Member

    11,182
    2,509
    3,303
    Apr 3, 2007
    Charlotte
    Senate race is looking very interesting.

    Ted Cruz losing to Colin Allred for first time: Texas poll

    The survey, conducted by Morning Consult between September 9 and 18, showed Allred one point ahead of Cruz, on 45 percent to his 44 percent among 2,716 likely voters. His lead was within the poll's margin of error of +/-2 percentage points.

    Cruz, the incumbent Texas Senator, has had a consistent but narrowing lead over his Democratic challenger in previous polls.

    "For the first time in this race, a new poll has us leading Ted Cruz by 1 point. I don't know about y'all but I'm fired up and ready to WIN! We've got 47 days, let's do this Texas," Allred said in a post on X, formerly Twitter.
     
    • Like Like x 4
    • Optimistic Optimistic x 1
  7. mdgator05

    mdgator05 Premium Member

    15,790
    2,036
    1,718
    Dec 9, 2010
    And now that chance is down to 48.6%.

     
    • Like Like x 3
  8. WarDamnGator

    WarDamnGator GC Hall of Fame

    10,695
    1,341
    1,718
    Apr 8, 2007
    LOL ... Trump went from +19.7 over Harris to - 2.5% under Harris ... in 4 DAYS ...

    That's a tanking campaign.
     
    • Like Like x 1
    • Winner Winner x 1
  9. gatordavisl

    gatordavisl VIP Member

    31,785
    54,915
    3,753
    Apr 8, 2007
    northern MN
    That's crazy talk. Don't trust polls and don't underestimate the power of the conservative vote. Old white people get out to vote.
     
    • Agree Agree x 2
  10. gatordavisl

    gatordavisl VIP Member

    31,785
    54,915
    3,753
    Apr 8, 2007
    northern MN
    This is meaningless until you do boat parades.
     
    • Agree Agree x 1
    • Winner Winner x 1
  11. gatordavisl

    gatordavisl VIP Member

    31,785
    54,915
    3,753
    Apr 8, 2007
    northern MN
    Ya beat me to it. :D
     
    • Funny Funny x 1
  12. gatordavisl

    gatordavisl VIP Member

    31,785
    54,915
    3,753
    Apr 8, 2007
    northern MN
    [​IMG]
     
    • Funny Funny x 10
  13. citygator

    citygator VIP Member

    11,182
    2,509
    3,303
    Apr 3, 2007
    Charlotte
    Not enough money to buy Silver for any more time?
     
  14. VAg8r1

    VAg8r1 GC Hall of Fame

    20,703
    1,704
    1,763
    Apr 8, 2007
    And although it's the exception in some elections young first time voters also get out to vote, see 2008 as the prime example and those voters tend to be overlooked by polls that use voting history as their "likely voter" screen.
     
  15. VAg8r1

    VAg8r1 GC Hall of Fame

    20,703
    1,704
    1,763
    Apr 8, 2007
    Reminds me of the poster from Kentucky who told us back in 2019 that he would be attending Matt Bevin's victory party.
     
    Last edited: Sep 20, 2024
    • Funny Funny x 2
  16. l_boy

    l_boy 5500

    12,909
    1,727
    3,268
    Jan 6, 2009
    I’m not holding my breath but I’d love to see Cruz lose.
     
    • Agree Agree x 4
  17. gatordavisl

    gatordavisl VIP Member

    31,785
    54,915
    3,753
    Apr 8, 2007
    northern MN
    All I'm saying is that if Trumph doesn't win, there will be a thread. I've got receipts. ;)
     
  18. gatordavisl

    gatordavisl VIP Member

    31,785
    54,915
    3,753
    Apr 8, 2007
    northern MN
    Can we just make it so they can vote from their cell phones? That'll increase the youngster turnout and create an innovative method of election theft for the progs. :devil:
     
  19. GatorRade

    GatorRade Rad Scientist

    8,621
    1,606
    1,478
    Apr 3, 2007
    I was thinking that this sounded like a an overly sensitive model, but the predicted popular vote shares are almost unchanged. Probably this is just a result of really close swing states flipping in the model. And I guess if the swing states were that close, maybe the model is a bit too sensitive, as likely Trump shouldn’t have gotten up to 60% chance in the first place.