Yeah, they have airtight case, so much so that... oops... BOOM! https://www.cnn.com/2024/07/02/politics/trump-sentencing-date-delay-proposal/index.html
You realize that if he gets off it's not because he is innocent, it's because Clarance Thomas' sugar daddy says that the proof of his guilt can't be admitted in court ...
Clarence Thomas was speaking to Judge Cannon and Jack Smith. He was not speaking to Judge Merchan and Bragg/Colangelo.
Total, 100%, unadulterated BS. You have no understanding of the law in this area, none....and it shows. Uhmm, it wasn't law, it was a trial.
Sure, the former President's legal team filed something and the DA wants to respond prior to sentencing. None of that has anything to do with an appeal. However, I notice that you didn't provide the important case law by which such an appeal would be decided. Would you like to try again?
Sure. I am sure that as good lawyers, they base their opinions on legal precedent. So, perhaps you could provide the legal precedent that your lawyer friends provided. I guess the alternative is that you don't have any. Is that the case?