Welcome home, fellow Gator.

The Gator Nation's oldest and most active insider community
Join today!

Trump calls for 10% tariff on all imports

Discussion in 'Too Hot for Swamp Gas' started by dangolegators, Aug 22, 2023.

  1. dangolegators

    dangolegators GC Hall of Fame

    Apr 26, 2007
    True tax burden is difficult to assess. Corporate income tax isn't just borne by shareholders. It is also borne by the people who purchase the product at a higher price than it would be if the corporation didn't have to pay any income taxes.
     
  2. l_boy

    l_boy 5500

    12,892
    1,727
    3,268
    Jan 6, 2009


    Thank you. You’ve just admitted the C Corp shareholder is taxed twice and the S Corp owner once and you have to compare the total. That was my whole point.

    It seems you don’t think twice (your word) means double. Whatever floats your boat.

    For the record I’ve never said such double taxation is good or bad or fair or unfair.
     
    • Like Like x 1
  3. l_boy

    l_boy 5500

    12,892
    1,727
    3,268
    Jan 6, 2009
    I disagree. I’m not sure how you can say corporate taxation is not borne by the shareholder and dividend taxation is. Again what if the selling company is an s corporation?
     
  4. dangolegators

    dangolegators GC Hall of Fame

    Apr 26, 2007
    It's a meaningless distinction, as meaningless as saying I'm being double taxed when I pay 6% sales tax to the state and 2.25% to local.
     
  5. dangolegators

    dangolegators GC Hall of Fame

    Apr 26, 2007
    Where did I say that? I'm saying pretty much all taxation is borne by everybody.
     
    • Come On Man Come On Man x 1
  6. l_boy

    l_boy 5500

    12,892
    1,727
    3,268
    Jan 6, 2009
    You just said it was twice but said it wasn’t double.

    But the important point isn’t whether it is double. The important point is that you compare the total burden at each level, which you also said. So comparing dividend and capital gains rates to income tax rates are apples and oranges.
     
  7. l_boy

    l_boy 5500

    12,892
    1,727
    3,268
    Jan 6, 2009
    you are talking in circles now. But yes all taxes are paid by everybody. That’s a pretty safe position to pivot to.
     
    • Funny Funny x 1
  8. dangolegators

    dangolegators GC Hall of Fame

    Apr 26, 2007
    Maybe reading comprehension is the issue here. Can you find where I said
    'corporate taxation is not borne by the shareholder and dividend taxation is'?
     
    • Come On Man Come On Man x 1
  9. l_boy

    l_boy 5500

    12,892
    1,727
    3,268
    Jan 6, 2009
  10. l_boy

    l_boy 5500

    12,892
    1,727
    3,268
    Jan 6, 2009
    Ok I missed the word “Just”. You are splitting hairs here.


     
    • Agree Agree x 1
  11. dangolegators

    dangolegators GC Hall of Fame

    Apr 26, 2007
    Splitting hairs? The 'just' changes the entire meaning of the sentence. Next time read better and you won't look foolish by responding to something that wasn't said.
     
    • Dislike Dislike x 1
  12. l_boy

    l_boy 5500

    12,892
    1,727
    3,268
    Jan 6, 2009
    You’ve been arguing against accepted economic concepts and constructs and were clearly wrong and now you are grasping at straws to try to save face. Whatever, you do you.
     
    • Winner Winner x 1
  13. Orange_and_Bluke

    Orange_and_Bluke Premium Member

    9,480
    2,211
    3,038
    Dec 16, 2015
    [​IMG]
     
  14. dangolegators

    dangolegators GC Hall of Fame

    Apr 26, 2007
    No it's not wrong to say 'double taxation' is a meaningless distinction. We're all taxed in dozens of ways. To make a big deal about something being 'double taxation' is just dumb.

    But I don't expect you to agree with that. I'll just be happy if we can get you to understand the difference between 'Corporate income tax isn't borne by shareholders' and 'Corporate income tax isn't just borne by shareholders'. If you think that's 'splitting hairs' you must also think the difference between the words 'yes' and 'no' is also splitting hairs.
     
    • Come On Man Come On Man x 1
  15. l_boy

    l_boy 5500

    12,892
    1,727
    3,268
    Jan 6, 2009
    Who made a “big deal” over it? My only point was that you have to look at the total burden of both taxes, which is a point you later reiterated. To compare a capital gain tax on corporate shares to earned income tax is not apples and oranges - which is one of the problems I was responding to by a poster who made a post that the rich only get taxed at something like 4%. You first argued it wasn’t double taxation and then argued that other things that aren’t double taxation are double taxation, but then admitted that it is being taxed “twice” but it isn’t important.
     
  16. enviroGator

    enviroGator GC Hall of Fame

    5,471
    746
    368
    Apr 12, 2007
    This is exactly why I chose not to go the ROTH IRA way. I would not be surprised to see a national sales tax in the future and do not want to have paid taxes upfront and then again when I go to spend the money.
     
    • Like Like x 1
  17. l_boy

    l_boy 5500

    12,892
    1,727
    3,268
    Jan 6, 2009
    In terms of a true end user sales tax, that is highly unlikely because high sales taxes tend not to work due to evasion. I don’t know of any country in the world that has a true national end user sales tax.

    Now a VAT tax is a definite possibility and there are examples around the world. In most cases though they actually supplement an income tax, not totally replace it. I don’t see that we are anywhere close politically to implementing a VAT but it is at least a plausible alternative.
     
    • Informative Informative x 1
  18. rtgator

    rtgator Premium Member

    7,304
    849
    458
    Apr 3, 2007
    FB_IMG_1631830625956.jpg
     
    • Informative Informative x 1