Welcome home, fellow Gator.

The Gator Nation's oldest and most active insider community
Join today!

Trump’s No Good Awful Very Bad Choice …

Discussion in 'Too Hot for Swamp Gas' started by duggers_dad, Feb 8, 2025 at 9:41 AM.

Page 2 of 2
  1. Feb 9, 2025 at 8:50 AM #21
    duggers_dad

    duggers_dad GC Hall of Fame

    17,398
    1,264
    2,088
    Jan 5, 2022
    Not that this is Christianity.
     
  2. Feb 9, 2025 at 10:56 AM #22
    slocala

    slocala VIP Member

    3,604
    823
    2,028
    Jan 11, 2009
    You failed the SAT analogy. Good try.
     
  3. Feb 9, 2025 at 11:06 AM #23
    insuragator

    insuragator VIP Member

    18,749
    593
    643
    Apr 3, 2007
    OK - I generally disagree with every thing you post but that shit was funny. I am still crying laughing. Well played sir.
     
  4. Feb 9, 2025 at 11:15 AM #24
    PITBOSS

    PITBOSS GC Hall of Fame

    8,201
    874
    558
    Apr 13, 2007

    Oh so many evangelical leaders are displeased with THIS nomination. It’s ironic, for an issue they are experts, they deem her as a bad choice. They should know other cabinet appointments were similarly just as bad and now in positions of power and extremely important to our country.
     
    Last edited: Feb 9, 2025 at 12:06 PM
  5. Feb 9, 2025 at 11:17 AM #25
    docspor

    docspor GC Hall of Fame

    6,152
    1,910
    3,078
    Nov 30, 2010
    What happened to cracking down on an anti Christian bias?
     
  6. Feb 9, 2025 at 11:23 AM #26
    channingcrowderhungry

    channingcrowderhungry Premium Member

    9,535
    2,148
    3,013
    Apr 3, 2007
    Bottom of a pint glass
    Once they finish tracking down the WMDs in Iraq they'll move on to anti-christian bias
     
  7. Feb 9, 2025 at 11:41 AM #27
    duggers_dad

    duggers_dad GC Hall of Fame

    17,398
    1,264
    2,088
    Jan 5, 2022
    Admittedly, a little sloppy. Slaveholders weren’t slaughtering upwards of a million human beings a year. Slaves were an essential means of production.
     
  8. Feb 9, 2025 at 1:15 PM #28
    108

    108 Premium Member

    18,240
    1,243
    1,313
    Apr 3, 2007
    NYC
    if you had the option of saving one living baby in a fire or 365,000 fetuses, what would you choose?
     
  9. Feb 9, 2025 at 1:30 PM #29
    g8orbill

    g8orbill Old Gator Moderator VIP Member

    127,614
    58,362
    114,663
    Apr 3, 2007
    Clermont, Fl
    I would do my level best to save both
     
  10. Feb 9, 2025 at 1:36 PM #30
    duggers_dad

    duggers_dad GC Hall of Fame

    17,398
    1,264
    2,088
    Jan 5, 2022
    You’re living in 1857 …

    If there was a fire would you save the person or the three-fifths a person ?
     
Page 2 of 2