Welcome home, fellow Gator.

The Gator Nation's oldest and most active insider community
Join today!

Transfer Portal Thread (Other Schools)

Discussion in 'Awesome Recruiting' started by INGATORSWETRUST, Mar 14, 2020.

  1. tommyvee

    tommyvee GC Hall of Fame

    17,390
    9,263
    3,293
    May 16, 2007
    Do we have a shot?
     
  2. tommyvee

    tommyvee GC Hall of Fame

    17,390
    9,263
    3,293
    May 16, 2007
    Me likey
     
  3. tommyvee

    tommyvee GC Hall of Fame

    17,390
    9,263
    3,293
    May 16, 2007
    Bailey who?
     
  4. tommyvee

    tommyvee GC Hall of Fame

    17,390
    9,263
    3,293
    May 16, 2007
    Torrence is a take all day long. Not sure about Johnson.
     
    • Agree Agree x 1
  5. username

    username GC Hall of Fame

    2,330
    1,006
    1,888
    Aug 17, 2017
    Think Johnson got bumped up to 4 stars, .90 grade. If that’s true, AND we don’t get citizen, this is a great move.
     
    • Like Like x 1
  6. username

    username GC Hall of Fame

    2,330
    1,006
    1,888
    Aug 17, 2017
    Sure hope so, dude is good. From the area too right?
     
  7. gatorpjb

    gatorpjb All American

    355
    307
    1,773
    Jan 1, 2021
    Lithia, Florida
    Johnson is a completely different back than Citizen … or for that matter Etienne. ULL used three backs in their rotation. I’m not sure if we get Citizen, but I don’t think Johnson would dissuade him.
     
    • Informative Informative x 1
  8. username

    username GC Hall of Fame

    2,330
    1,006
    1,888
    Aug 17, 2017
    3 backs in one cycle is a lot, especially when we should already have our starters next season on roster.

    I won’t complain tho, I want them all. Must stockpile talent
     
  9. 06GATORS08

    06GATORS08 GC Hall of Fame

    1,508
    422
    1,963
    Dec 12, 2009
    Torrence and Johnson are both in the UF directory. Just confirmed for myself.
     
    • Like Like x 4
    • Fistbump/Thanks! Fistbump/Thanks! x 1
    • Informative Informative x 1
  10. kryptonite

    kryptonite GC Hall of Fame

    3,120
    1,205
    2,018
    Dec 12, 2008
    I don't really buy that because high 4* and 5* rb recruits at Bama and Georgia sit for a couple of years too or have minimal contributions as freshmen and sophomores when there are 3 highly recruited and seasoned rb in front of them. Pierce, Davis, and Wright weren't garbage backs. They deserved reps even if Bowman and Lingard were very good.
     
    • Agree Agree x 2
    • Like Like x 1
  11. gatorpjb

    gatorpjb All American

    355
    307
    1,773
    Jan 1, 2021
    Lithia, Florida
    Well they all bring something different to the table and Citizen is certainly not a given to UF. Johnson is curious since he played so much as a freshman…I don’t see him coming to sit on the bench. Personally I think he is coming to replicate Malik Davis’s role… a smaller back with really good hands.
    We’ll see, Citizen seems to be a natural fit to replace Pierce… neither Bowman or Lingard appear to be pure power runners, and Etienne although larger seems more of elusive style with some power.
    I would guess one adjunct benefit from the ULL transfers is that they have all been through Hocke’s twelve month training regime, and can help with the adjustment for the rest of the team.
     
    • Like Like x 3
  12. Wanne15

    Wanne15 GC Hall of Fame

    16,240
    4,156
    3,088
    Jan 18, 2015
    We don’t have a proven back other than a presently injured one. I’m not a stars don’t matter guy but at this point, they actually don’t. Bowman and Lingard are going to have to carry the ball for brownie points. Yardage not hs potential. They’ve had more than enough time to either do it this year or get passed
     
    • Like Like x 1
  13. fox

    fox GC Hall of Fame

    17,647
    28,492
    3,328
    Apr 3, 2007
    Florida Beachland
    In addition to Waite I think we have 3 good ones. I wonder if the WR is coming. Possible the portal points elsewhere?

    I suppose staff has reasons to keep them quiet.
     
    • Like Like x 1
  14. magnafides

    magnafides GC Hall of Fame

    2,331
    166
    293
    Aug 1, 2009
    South Florida
    I'm of the opinion that transfers have to be "rated" on a case-by-case basis since there are so many reasons why they may be transferring. Just like a Senior H.S. recruit can have heavy swings to their recruiting profiles from their Jr years, so can transfers.
     
    • Like Like x 1
    • Agree Agree x 1
  15. WC53

    WC53 GC Hall of Fame

    4,706
    994
    2,088
    Oct 17, 2015
    Old City
    Because they have better stronger players in front of them. ;)
     
    • Like Like x 1
  16. username

    username GC Hall of Fame

    2,330
    1,006
    1,888
    Aug 17, 2017
    Si you’re just going to choose to ignore the plethora of evidence showing they were never given a chance due to seniority and just act like they couldn’t crack the rotation of upperclassmen? Especially when bowman was a freshman lol wtf
     
    • Agree Agree x 1
    • Winner Winner x 1
  17. Wanne15

    Wanne15 GC Hall of Fame

    16,240
    4,156
    3,088
    Jan 18, 2015
    I’m saying they have limited carries and aren’t proven, nothing more nothing less. From what little bit I’ve seen, I don’t see a top 5 back in the nation. A five star out of hs is predicated to be just that.
     
  18. bobbybaker86

    bobbybaker86 GC Hall of Fame

    9,071
    11,360
    3,258
    Sep 4, 2017
    I def get what you're saying. What Bowman and ESPECIALLY Lingard did in HS no longer holds weight. It's put up or shut up time this spring for them and yes we're transitioning to a new O with a new OC but cream rises to the top. If they are what we think they are, they'll show it or get passed up
     
    • Agree Agree x 2
    • Like Like x 1
    • Winner Winner x 1
  19. kryptonite

    kryptonite GC Hall of Fame

    3,120
    1,205
    2,018
    Dec 12, 2008
    Yes, that is kind of my point. Having one of the most productive Georgia players of all time, one of the most productive backs in Florida history, and a borderline 5 star (before injury in high school) who all have had years to develop in college ahead of them does not diminish the talent they had in high school. Their evaluation is just incomplete because they haven't had the shot to prove themselves yet.
     
    • Like Like x 1
  20. kryptonite

    kryptonite GC Hall of Fame

    3,120
    1,205
    2,018
    Dec 12, 2008
    The problem is that the difference between top 5 and top 10 backs can be slight, and you have up to 5 years worth of them in college plus late developers who become fantastic players, so it is hard to stand out among all of them. It doesn't mean that either of them can become great or be a huge bust once they get a chance to prove themselves.