Welcome home, fellow Gator.

The Gator Nation's oldest and most active insider community
Join today!

TikTok given sanctuary

Discussion in 'Too Hot for Swamp Gas' started by GatorWon, Jan 20, 2025.

  1. GatorWon

    GatorWon GC Hall of Fame

    2,178
    79
    273
    Apr 3, 2007

    APPLICATION OF PROTECTING AMERICANS FROM FOREIGN ADVERSARY CONTROLLED APPLICATIONS ACT TO TIKTOK – The White House


    China will continue to collect data on US citizens and the law can be safely ignored for 75 days.
     
    • Informative Informative x 1
    • Optimistic Optimistic x 1
  2. WarDamnGator

    WarDamnGator GC Hall of Fame

    11,141
    1,396
    1,718
    Apr 8, 2007
    This is one of the few things I agree with. If the government has proof the Chinese government is using data for some bad purpose, show it ... the argument that they "could be" is weak as hell. I personally think they should bar all corporations from collecting data. This is protectionism sponsored by Zuck and Musk, who collect the same data and allow developers in Russia and China to access the data ... it's always been bullshit.
     
    • Agree Agree x 2
    • Disagree Bacon! Disagree Bacon! x 1
  3. docspor

    docspor GC Hall of Fame

    6,123
    1,903
    3,078
    Nov 30, 2010
    me too. The national security card has been badly abused.
     
    • Disagree Bacon! Disagree Bacon! x 1
  4. danmanne65

    danmanne65 GC Hall of Fame

    4,080
    869
    268
    Jul 2, 2022
    DeLand
    Yep. I agree that TikTok is harvesting info but they could just as easily buy it from all the American internet companies that are harvesting information as fast as they can.
     
    • Winner Winner x 1
  5. G8trGr8t

    G8trGr8t Premium Member

    33,525
    12,290
    3,693
    Aug 26, 2008
    The real issue is their ability to change their algorithm to push whatever content they want to that supports whatever political stance the CCP has.
     
    • Agree Agree x 1
  6. ThePlayer

    ThePlayer VIP Member

    39,432
    5,404
    2,193
    Apr 3, 2007
    Not so fast WonTon.
    After GOP senators explain the 'golden share' Xi holds with all Chinese companies to Trump, this deal is dead.
     
  7. mdgator05

    mdgator05 Premium Member

    16,844
    2,157
    1,718
    Dec 9, 2010
    So your argument is that the guy who claims to be a businessman (with business interests in China) and spent 4 years as President doesn't understand how business works in China?
     
  8. BLING

    BLING GC Hall of Fame

    9,228
    930
    2,843
    Apr 16, 2007
    Uhhh… isn’t that pretty well known already? That the CCP mandates foreign companies form a “Joint Venture” with a Chinese firm? That is not news. It’s bs on the part of the Chinese. But shouldn’t be news to anyone paying attention.
     
  9. WarDamnGator

    WarDamnGator GC Hall of Fame

    11,141
    1,396
    1,718
    Apr 8, 2007
    The key from @ThePlayer 's post is that someone smarter than Trump has to explain it him ... probably with small words and pictures.
     
  10. CHFG8R

    CHFG8R GC Hall of Fame

    6,728
    599
    393
    Apr 24, 2007
    St. Augustine, FL
  11. CHFG8R

    CHFG8R GC Hall of Fame

    6,728
    599
    393
    Apr 24, 2007
    St. Augustine, FL
    They're the CCP, what other purpose would they have? Why do they insist on maintaining the ability to collect it? Why do they ban it, FB, X and all the rest in China, but promote it here?

    The math isn't that hard dude. They're not good guys. They're basically the Nazis without the Jewish/Racial Superiority (though that is implied to the population) policy. They learned the lesson, so it's a softer approach. Soft Fascism. . . until it's time to lose the "soft" part.
     
  12. WarDamnGator

    WarDamnGator GC Hall of Fame

    11,141
    1,396
    1,718
    Apr 8, 2007
    At this point, there is no public information being provided by the US government that shows (a) TikTok is giving the data to the Chinese government and (b) China has found some way to use that data that could harm Americans... all I'm saying is that if there is a "national security threat" posed by TikTok, then make the case for it to the American people ... if it's convincing, I'll change my mind. But this reminds me of the recent thread about Cuba being on the US's list of terrorist sponsoring governments, even though there are no examples of Cuba sponsoring terrorism. Meanwhile, it's well know the US sponsored an attempted coup in Cuba ...
     
  13. CHFG8R

    CHFG8R GC Hall of Fame

    6,728
    599
    393
    Apr 24, 2007
    St. Augustine, FL
    1. They have access whenever they want it (by law). That's enough for me. ;
    2. It's horrible and is being proven to be harmful - especially to children - in study after study.
    3. It's "features" can easily be replaced with a host of similar apps. Thus, no 1st Amendment issue whatsoever.
    4. It pisses the CCP off! Again, works for me.
     
  14. citygator

    citygator VIP Member

    12,734
    2,708
    3,303
    Apr 3, 2007
    Charlotte
    [​IMG]
     
  15. WarDamnGator

    WarDamnGator GC Hall of Fame

    11,141
    1,396
    1,718
    Apr 8, 2007
    I don’t disagree with most of that, and i understand that Chinese law says they have to hand over the data if asked, but banning it because it’s harmful to children shouldn’t be limited to one app from one country. Facebook and others have similar scrolling video players. I don’t use TikTok, but from the people I know that do, they say it’s the best at showing you what you want to see and it’s not even close. Facebook has failed to emulate their “algorithm”, and the youth has gone to TikTok while Facebook has become grandma’s platform. which is probably why Zuck apparently pushed for the ban and paid firms to lobby against TikTok. Then beyond that, even if put in the CCP, what is the harm of the CCP knowing how many hours some kids spend scrolling videos and what they like to watch?

    Anyway, Trump delaying the ban was a huge win for him with young voters and makes Biden and the congressional democrat look like giant fools for going against them, just to have the rug pulled out from under them at the last minute. I’ve been saying all along with was a disaster in the making for the Dems, who court young voters, and Trump just made even bigger fools of them. They pissed off their future voters and made Trump their hero savior.
     
    • Winner Winner x 1
  16. CHFG8R

    CHFG8R GC Hall of Fame

    6,728
    599
    393
    Apr 24, 2007
    St. Augustine, FL
    No Logan's Run reference? I'm disappointed.
     
  17. Gatorrick22

    Gatorrick22 GC Hall of Fame

    89,609
    27,027
    4,613
    Apr 3, 2007
  18. CHFG8R

    CHFG8R GC Hall of Fame

    6,728
    599
    393
    Apr 24, 2007
    St. Augustine, FL
    Oh, don't get me started on the others. FB doesn't care what you want, it feeds you what it knows it can get a reaction/engagement from you on. Two examples of FB's evil.

    1. While banned for saying basically nothing (g.y, I think), it continued to feed me a bunch of really divisive shit, and allow me to engage with the crap, but never with my groups, friends, etc.
    2. After this, I made a concerted attempt over a month to block the divisive spam sites. To no avail. If anything, it sent me more.
    3. Someone stole my profile and put Sr. at the end. I am a Jr, but my dad goes by our middle name. I requested it be removed as it was fake. Their response: "Upon further review we have decided not to grant your request.

    That was it and I've been done with FB ever since. Too bad, because it has value (especially in its original form), but they're just too evil and greedy. Burn it to the ground! Burn them all to the ground.
     
  19. CHFG8R

    CHFG8R GC Hall of Fame

    6,728
    599
    393
    Apr 24, 2007
    St. Augustine, FL
    The "young voters" will be over it within a month, when the newer and more vapid POS app gives them something to waste their brains on.
     
  20. GatorWon

    GatorWon GC Hall of Fame

    2,178
    79
    273
    Apr 3, 2007
    I understand the issues raised by some of you, but ultimately the law is on the books.

    For whatever reason, President Musk, managed to secure a non-legally binding Executive Order that states the law can be disregarded without facing any repercussions.

    Rand Paul is proposing a law to repeal the TikTok ban. That’s the way it should be done.