Welcome home, fellow Gator.

The Gator Nation's oldest and most active insider community
Join today!

Three kids killed by shooter at Christian school

Discussion in 'Too Hot for Swamp Gas' started by oragator1, Mar 27, 2023.

  1. jjgator55

    jjgator55 VIP Member

    6,198
    1,765
    2,043
    Apr 3, 2007
    That’s not even a legitimate argument. The Heller case should have told you that.
     
  2. jjgator55

    jjgator55 VIP Member

    6,198
    1,765
    2,043
    Apr 3, 2007
    Who is advocating that?
     
    • Like Like x 1
    • Fistbump/Thanks! Fistbump/Thanks! x 1
    • Winner Winner x 1
  3. pkaib01

    pkaib01 GC Hall of Fame

    3,731
    789
    2,063
    Apr 3, 2007
    The strawman.
     
    • Winner Winner x 5
    • Agree Agree x 1
  4. sierragator

    sierragator GC Hall of Fame

    15,279
    13,204
    1,853
    Apr 8, 2007
    Yep, in spite of the hysterical scare tactics, the second amendment is not going anywhere and no, they are not going door to door to take away your precious firearms.
     
    • Winner Winner x 1
  5. okeechobee

    okeechobee GC Hall of Fame

    9,807
    1,276
    428
    Sep 11, 2022
    But if you trust the government to implement meaningful gun control, why don’t you trust them to secure our schools? Nice way of revealing your agenda.
     
    • Fistbump/Thanks! Fistbump/Thanks! x 1
  6. gatordavisl

    gatordavisl VIP Member

    31,890
    54,931
    3,753
    Apr 8, 2007
    northern MN
    Some good pts re: The liquor analogy and I'm really sorry about your cuz. Some counterpoints:
    • I believe 2020 was relatively low year for gun deaths, which have increased since.
    • Gun violence is about more than mass shootings, which get the headlines.
    • Automobiles are far more useful than guns, esp. for the general population.
    • I bet there have been threads about drunk drivers killing children.
    • Gun violence is no longer a random phenomenon. It shows a pattern specific to the U.S.
     
    • Agree Agree x 1
  7. jjgator55

    jjgator55 VIP Member

    6,198
    1,765
    2,043
    Apr 3, 2007
    So you’re saying people suffering from anxiety or depression owing weapons should be legal despite the fact that they are more likely to commit a mass killing of others and/or themselves?
     
  8. orangeblue_coop

    orangeblue_coop GC Hall of Fame

    4,259
    707
    2,938
    Nov 19, 2016
    The fact that you retorted by accusing me of something I didn't even say lets me know you were triggered by my post. Way to holler, you hit dog
     
    • Disagree Bacon! Disagree Bacon! x 1
  9. orangeblue_coop

    orangeblue_coop GC Hall of Fame

    4,259
    707
    2,938
    Nov 19, 2016
    It's all they have because they refuse to have that conversation about gun control that they've been ducking and dodging forever
     
    • Agree Agree x 2
  10. BigCypressGator1981

    BigCypressGator1981 GC Hall of Fame

    6,707
    1,374
    3,103
    Oct 11, 2011
    We need to quit treating this like an either/or situation. We need to do both.
     
    Last edited: Mar 29, 2023
    • Agree Agree x 2
  11. oragator1

    oragator1 Premium Member

    22,956
    5,610
    3,488
    Apr 3, 2007
    Someone with anxiety isn’t homicidal by nature. It’s people who have more severe issues, combined with drug use and lack of treatment.

    Psychiatric Illness And Criminality - StatPearls - NCBI Bookshelf

    And more to the point, even if you were right, by what degree is it Ok to shut them down? If they are .001 percent more likely, do we take their guns away? And to extend that, white males are more likely than black females to commit mass murder, should all white men be banned from owning guns? How about poor people, they are more likely to commit murder. So are African Americans, take theirs away too?

    it should be reserved for very specific cases where people have shown actual warning signs of being a risk.
     
    • Informative Informative x 1
  12. okeechobee

    okeechobee GC Hall of Fame

    9,807
    1,276
    428
    Sep 11, 2022
    So, what’s the problem? Shouldn’t you be pouring your energy into securing the schools versus trying to infringe on the right to bear arms? I happen to trust the government can do both.
     
  13. BLING

    BLING GC Hall of Fame

    8,784
    861
    2,843
    Apr 16, 2007
    It makes little sense, and is also completely circular.

    “We need unfettered access to guns to protect us from a tyrannical govt, and also also we need more police state security to protect everyone from guns”.

    Dafuq.
     
    • Like Like x 2
    • Agree Agree x 1
    • Fistbump/Thanks! Fistbump/Thanks! x 1
  14. orangeblue_coop

    orangeblue_coop GC Hall of Fame

    4,259
    707
    2,938
    Nov 19, 2016
    I didn't comment on whether I trusted the government or not, so enough with the strawman. You were clearly triggered by that post since you feel it applies to you LOL
     
  15. mikemcd810

    mikemcd810 Premium Member

    1,957
    435
    348
    Apr 3, 2007
    Because it's not a reasonable proposal. Shooters can easily get through a locked door by shooting the lock or shooting out a window. Only a having a single entry point is a fire disaster waiting to happen. Armed security guards haven't prevented past shootings. I've seen people mention that we can secure airports but there are 50k TSA agents for 440 airports - that ratio is not remotely practical for schools. Schools come in all variety of layouts so there's no one size fits all solution to securing schools. Are we talking about replacing all doors with steel reinforced doors? All windows with bullet proof windows? Fencing with barbed wire? Multiple guards with assault rifles patrolling the grounds? Personally, that sounds like complete madness to me as opposed to working on the issue at the source, which is the guns.
     
    • Agree Agree x 2
    • Winner Winner x 1
  16. okeechobee

    okeechobee GC Hall of Fame

    9,807
    1,276
    428
    Sep 11, 2022
    So securing schools, much the way we do airports now constitutes a police state? Are you arguing airport security makes us a police state? Are you saying we need to get rid of the TSA, because it’s too police stateish?
     
    • Come On Man Come On Man x 1
  17. wgbgator

    wgbgator Premium Member

    29,824
    1,850
    1,968
    Apr 19, 2007
    I think he's explaining why its legal, the only requirements for owning a gun are not being a criminal or adjudicated mentally incompetent. Being under the care of a therapist or doctor doesnt mean you are any of those things. As I said, this is mainly a problem for the people who present arguments about how the "law abiding" should be free of regulation or restrictions. If they want to pick and choose who can own guns, they violate that principle, if they maintain it, a bunch of people who definitely shouldn't own guns in any sane society will get them (but that can certainly be abused too to take them away from people).
     
    • Winner Winner x 1
  18. okeechobee

    okeechobee GC Hall of Fame

    9,807
    1,276
    428
    Sep 11, 2022
    Honestly, I hear much of what you’re saying, but it’s actually a more reasonable proposal than your gun control measures, because at least with secured schools, we’d have a guarantee. Your gun control proposals guarantee us nothing.
     
    • Disagree Bacon! Disagree Bacon! x 2
  19. jjgator55

    jjgator55 VIP Member

    6,198
    1,765
    2,043
    Apr 3, 2007
    In many states like Tennessee there are zero red flag laws so we would never know who should or shouldn’t have a firearm. There’s no telling how many lives have been saved in Florida thanks to the Republican legislature, who in a moment of clarity, recognized the need by passing red flag laws after Parkland. As a result thousands of people in Florida have had their guns confiscated.

    Florida's red flag law, championed by Republicans, is taking guns from thousands of people | CNN Politics

    I should note that DeSantis said he would have vetoed the act.
     
    Last edited: Mar 29, 2023
    • Informative Informative x 1