Welcome home, fellow Gator.

The Gator Nation's oldest and most active insider community
Join today!

The spreading GOP destruction of public education

Discussion in 'Too Hot for Swamp Gas' started by citygator, May 23, 2023.

  1. BLING

    BLING GC Hall of Fame

    8,792
    862
    2,843
    Apr 16, 2007
    Isn’t that the crux of the issue? Fundamentalists have an issue with both public education and health plans because they are indirectly “funding things they don’t approve of”. Of course this ignores that money is fungible. Likewise “Conservatives” can keep expanding their list of boycotts ad infinitum over social issues… but to what end?

    We see with the book bans or that issue over the choice of movie shown in class. Being able to “opt out” isn’t good enough for these people. They have to destroy those opportunities for other students, instead of the freedom of opting out, all other students have to adhere to a rigid worldview. Even if it’s just 1 parent! Similarly, if one is anti-abortion they could always choose to not get an abortion or birth control. But that isn’t good enough, for the fundamentalist they must be able to impose their ideologues on others.

    Obviously not a sustainable arrangement in a free society. This behavior is actually completely antithetical to freedom.
     
    • Winner Winner x 3
    • Agree Agree x 1
    • Creative Creative x 1
  2. tilly

    tilly Superhero Mod. Fast witted. Bulletproof posts. Moderator VIP Member

    Roy is a jellyfish. He does what he is told
    Oh and he plays the culture war drum just like the right does. (Hint: its how he got elected ...on a single issue basically).

    He is being hyperbolic to appeal to a base.
    This is the same state that once lowered math requirements because the schools math results were always lacking. (Jim Hunt was the democratic governor that did that iirc).

    But dont be fooled. This isnt just about rich peoples money. Cooper is opposed to the Opportunity Scholarship Program, which awards private school scholarships to children from low-income households.

    He is a pandering politician.
     
    • Disagree Bacon! Disagree Bacon! x 2
    • Winner Winner x 2
    • Informative Informative x 2
    • Like Like x 1
  3. tilly

    tilly Superhero Mod. Fast witted. Bulletproof posts. Moderator VIP Member

    This isnt about that at all. Read what I have written. He has shot down any attempt at school choice. Even scholarship programs for low income children.

    Tax payers in a free society should have some say in by who and how their kids are educated. Draw a line at a certain income level if you need to, but him not even being willing to support scholarships for poor kids makes it pretty clear that he is just playing the same game the right is.

    Neither is really interested in our kids.

    And my oldest just finished her freshman year at a public university in this state after graduating from a public HS here, and though we have used 3 different options for educating our kids during different seasons, public schools have certainly been a part of the journey. So my opinion is not an indictment on the PS system here, but rather on this myth that Cooper and the dems here have some deeper love for education than anyone else

    They love power. Both sides do.
     
    • Agree Agree x 3
    • Disagree Bacon! Disagree Bacon! x 2
    • Winner Winner x 1
  4. BLING

    BLING GC Hall of Fame

    8,792
    862
    2,843
    Apr 16, 2007
    Why is not wanting to give away taxpayer money to private schools “pandering”? Do we typically give away taxpayer dollars to spend in a private enterprise? Should every person just be given $5000 to purchase health care?

    Maybe he just thinks every dollar should stay in public schools and not be given away? That is actually the dilemna with even (theoretically) well meaning vouchers programs. If you take that $$$, and maybe take away a certain % of students. You are leaving ruins for the students left behind. School choice has that potential impact as well, and can be a bussing nightmare for a district if neighborhood kids can go to 2 or 3 different schools rather than just 1. So it might be great for some % of students and mean devastation to others (and you can almost guarantee a higher proportion of minorities will be the ones left negatively impacted).
     
    • Agree Agree x 3
    • Winner Winner x 3
    • Like Like x 1
  5. rivergator

    rivergator Too Hot Mod Moderator VIP Member

    35,431
    1,758
    2,258
    Apr 8, 2007
    Has anything been more vital to the great American melting pot than public education? Has anything done more to bring us together?
     
    • Winner Winner x 5
    • Agree Agree x 2
    • Like Like x 1
  6. BobK89

    BobK89 GC Hall of Fame

    12,127
    445
    818
    Apr 9, 2007
    Tampa, FL
    As to school vouchers, there are a finite number of openings in private schools. Voucher supporters act like everyone can go private, and that is not the case. What concerns me is the possibility of a shylock opening "Doug's Private School," taking the voucher money and having no educational credentials to actually be able to teach children.
     
    • Winner Winner x 1
  7. tilly

    tilly Superhero Mod. Fast witted. Bulletproof posts. Moderator VIP Member

    I mean you brought up health care lol.
    You and I likely agree on health care, which is an interesting point.

    Free healthcare paid by taxpayers exists for certain people already. Cooper doesnt want any tax money going to help even poor kids in bad districts. So this isnt about tax money to private citizens.

    Seems the very attitude he would hammer conservatives for in a health care conversation. He gave away huge amounts of tax money for unemployment caused when he kept the state closed longer than many.

    This governor has no issue with taking tax money and giving it to non public things... And to private citizens to use on health care. I just think he should do the same for educating kids.

    This is political. The teachers union loves the guy
     
    • Like Like x 1
    • Winner Winner x 1
  8. tilly

    tilly Superhero Mod. Fast witted. Bulletproof posts. Moderator VIP Member

    Maybe, but freedom of education is what keeps us that way. When poor kids can only be educated by a government system, that is a slippery slope. Government run schools can eventually become puppets to that government as we see globally. The free system of open education is important and poor kids need that freedom too.
     
    • Agree Agree x 2
  9. rivergator

    rivergator Too Hot Mod Moderator VIP Member

    35,431
    1,758
    2,258
    Apr 8, 2007
    Is this merely Cooper pandering?
     
    • Informative Informative x 2
    • Fistbump/Thanks! Fistbump/Thanks! x 1
  10. rivergator

    rivergator Too Hot Mod Moderator VIP Member

    35,431
    1,758
    2,258
    Apr 8, 2007
    I suppose it was Limbaugh who convinced conservatives that after 150 years or so "public schools" should be called "government schools" to make them sound more ominous and threatening.
    Schools becoming puppets of the government ... has that really been an issue until ... DeSantis?

    As far as your emphasis on poor kids, the Republican bill would open vouchers to all income levels, correct?
     
    • Winner Winner x 1
  11. jjgator55

    jjgator55 VIP Member

    6,198
    1,765
    2,043
    Apr 3, 2007
    Well heck Tampagtr what didn’t you like about my post since we’re in agreement?
     
  12. Spurffelbow833

    Spurffelbow833 GC Hall of Fame

    9,541
    725
    1,293
    Jan 9, 2009
    No, it's just a weird place. You'll be fine.
     
  13. jjgator55

    jjgator55 VIP Member

    6,198
    1,765
    2,043
    Apr 3, 2007
    You beat me to it. I never understood how a corporate school could do a better job educating poor kids than public schools and still turn a profit.
     
  14. Spurffelbow833

    Spurffelbow833 GC Hall of Fame

    9,541
    725
    1,293
    Jan 9, 2009
    Yes. You just don't like it because the shoe's on the other foot now.
     
    • Disagree Bacon! Disagree Bacon! x 2
    • Agree Agree x 1
  15. okeechobee

    okeechobee GC Hall of Fame

    9,838
    1,289
    428
    Sep 11, 2022
    Do private school parents not pay school tax or property taxes? It's not really a subsidy if they're paying for it out of pocket. Our public schools have been failing for decades. That's not the fault of voucher programs. That's a public entity that has lost their way. There should be multiple options for educating your children. If you want to scrap vouchers, can parents opt out of property and school taxes?
     
    • Funny Funny x 1
  16. citygator

    citygator VIP Member

    11,486
    2,540
    3,303
    Apr 3, 2007
    Charlotte
    Tilly. This is pretty much a lie. It is NOT focused on the poor. Talk about pandering. The income requirements for the opportunity scholarship includes 94% of households. However, the users will be those who can afford the difference between these scholarships and tuition which will be the wealthiest students. Secondly.. where do you think the money is coming for this expansion? Answer, the public budget. Look at those dollar diversions. Public schools need more funding not less.

    Income requirements:
    https://www.ncseaa.edu/wp-content/uploads/sites/1171/2020/10/HHIncomeEligibilityGuidelines.pdf

    Income percentile calculator:
    Income Percentile by State Calculator


    Budget expansion
    [​IMG]
     
    • Informative Informative x 2
    • Fistbump/Thanks! Fistbump/Thanks! x 1
  17. rivergator

    rivergator Too Hot Mod Moderator VIP Member

    35,431
    1,758
    2,258
    Apr 8, 2007
    Huh? What shoe?
     
  18. Tjgators

    Tjgators Premium Member

    5,000
    611
    358
    Apr 3, 2007
    it's about school choice:
    Senate Bill 406, also known as “Choose Your School, Choose Your Future,” is an initiative to make opportunity scholarships (also known as “vouchers”) available to families of all income levels. This would allow parents to use public school fund allocated for their children and use it to send them to a private school of their choosing.

    The bill will also require public schools to allow students to graduate from high school in three years, instead of four.
     
    • Funny Funny x 1
  19. mrhansduck

    mrhansduck GC Hall of Fame

    4,783
    994
    1,788
    Nov 23, 2021
    The other three R's:

    Race, Religion, and Royalties.
     
    • Agree Agree x 2
  20. citygator

    citygator VIP Member

    11,486
    2,540
    3,303
    Apr 3, 2007
    Charlotte
    What if you dont have kids? The fact is it is the public's benefit to have an educated workforce even if you dont have kids or dont use the public school system. Same with airports you dont use or roads you dont use.

    There is a 30 year old lawsuit flying around NC that poor districts are suing the state for lack of funding. Got a favorable ruling a few months ago. There is a public need to fund education and the GOP only makes it more unbalanced.
    The Leandro case: A summary of the ongoing debate about educational funding
     
    • Agree Agree x 2
    • Winner Winner x 2