Welcome home, fellow Gator.

The Gator Nation's oldest and most active insider community
Join today!
  1. Hi there... Can you please quickly check to make sure your email address is up to date here? Just in case we need to reach out to you or you lose your password. Muchero thanks!

The Party of Life does it again

Discussion in 'Too Hot for Swamp Gas' started by VAg8r1, Nov 1, 2024.

Page 2 of 6
  1. Nov 2, 2024 #21
    QGator2414

    QGator2414 VIP Member

    18,421
    1,612
    1,308
    Aug 24, 2009
    Ocala
    You are spot on this is not about abortion!

    The Texas Law on abortion has nothing to do treating a patient that has sepsis. Nothing!
     
    • Like Like x 1
    • Winner Winner x 1
    • Come On Man Come On Man x 1
  2. Nov 2, 2024 #22
    AzCatFan

    AzCatFan GC Hall of Fame

    12,209
    1,157
    1,618
    Apr 9, 2007
    The fetus had a heartbeat. Treating the woman's sepsis would have highly likely caused the fetal heartbeat to stop; or otherwise known as an abortion. Under Texas law, as long as there is a fetal heartbeat, doctors cannot do anything that will cause said heartbeat to stop.

    Ergo, doctors could not treat the woman's sepsis until the heartbeat stopped on its own. But by waiting until this occurred, the sepsis became too severe and killed the woman's life.

    What part of this do you refuse to accept and understand? And I ask again, who was saved in this case?
     
    • Optimistic x 3
    • Dislike x 1
    • Fistbump/Thanks! x 1
    • Winner x 1
    • Come On Man x 1
  3. Nov 2, 2024 #23
    VAg8r1

    VAg8r1 GC Hall of Fame

    21,436
    1,783
    1,763
    Apr 8, 2007
    The Texas law is a vaguely written "heartbeat law". There is always the possibility that an overly aggressive prosecutor could charge a doctor who terminates a pregnancy if the fetus has a heartbeat or any other indicator that it is still alive with violating the statute even if there is virtually no chance of survival. The Texas case bears a remarkable resemblance to similar case in "prolife" Ireland 12 years ago.
    Death of Savita Halappanavar
    On 21 October 2012, Halappanavar, then 17 weeks pregnant, was examined at University Hospital Galway after complaining of back pain, but was soon discharged without a diagnosis. She returned to the hospital later that day, this time complaining of lower pressure, a sensation she described as feeling "something coming down", and a subsequent examination found that the gestational sac was protruding from her body. She was admitted to hospital, as it was determined that miscarriage was unavoidable, and several hours later, just after midnight on 22 October, her water broke but did not expel the fetus.[8]: 22–26 [8]: 29 [9] The following day, on 23 October, Halappanavar discussed abortion with her consulting physician but her request was promptly refused, as Irish law at that time forbade abortion if a foetal heartbeat was still present, with her midwife furthermore stating that "Ireland is a Catholic country".[8]: 33 [10] Afterwards, Halappanavar developed sepsis and, despite doctors' efforts to treat her, had a cardiac arrest at 1:09 AM on 28 October, and died, aged 31.[8]: 53 [8]: 44–46 ​
     
    Last edited: Nov 2, 2024
    • Dislike Dislike x 1
    • Fistbump/Thanks! Fistbump/Thanks! x 1
    • Winner Winner x 1
    • Optimistic Optimistic x 1
  4. Nov 2, 2024 #24
    FutureGatorMom

    FutureGatorMom Premium Member

    10,933
    1,255
    808
    Apr 3, 2007
    Florida
    No, she was pregnant, there was still a heartbeat so they couldn't treat her for the sepsis.
     
    • Fistbump/Thanks! Fistbump/Thanks! x 2
    • Dislike Dislike x 1
    • Disagree Bacon! Disagree Bacon! x 1
  5. Nov 2, 2024 #25
    FutureGatorMom

    FutureGatorMom Premium Member

    10,933
    1,255
    808
    Apr 3, 2007
    Florida
    What part of the fetus had a heart beat and they couldn't treat her because of TEXAS LAW is confusing you?
     
    • Fistbump/Thanks! Fistbump/Thanks! x 2
    • Optimistic Optimistic x 2
    • Dislike Dislike x 1
    • Winner Winner x 1
  6. Nov 2, 2024 #26
    philnotfil

    philnotfil GC Hall of Fame

    17,727
    1,789
    1,718
    Apr 8, 2007
    Especially given that the Texas AG has gone out of his way to publicly announce that he would do so.
     
    • Fistbump/Thanks! Fistbump/Thanks! x 1
    • Come On Man Come On Man x 1
  7. Nov 2, 2024 #27
    rivergator

    rivergator Too Hot Mod Moderator VIP Member

    35,666
    1,790
    2,258
    Apr 8, 2007
    • Dislike Dislike x 1
    • Agree Agree x 1
    • Fistbump/Thanks! Fistbump/Thanks! x 1
  8. Nov 2, 2024 #28
    HeyItsMe

    HeyItsMe GC Hall of Fame

    1,877
    558
    2,088
    Mar 7, 2009
    Pro-life when it comes to the womb, but once out, they make no effort via legislation to help those who may need the extra assistance to support the child, make no effort to curb the needless gun violence in schools while proudly wearing their AR-15 lapel pins, and allow the women with non-viable pregnancies to carry to term, many times resulting in death or permanent long term harm to the mother.
     
    Last edited by a moderator: Nov 2, 2024
    • Winner Winner x 3
    • Dislike Dislike x 1
    • Fistbump/Thanks! Fistbump/Thanks! x 1
  9. Nov 2, 2024 #29
    QGator2414

    QGator2414 VIP Member

    18,421
    1,612
    1,308
    Aug 24, 2009
    Ocala
    This is factual BS! You literally just want to legally kill babies I guess. Disgusting you would post something so wrong to support the legal killing of the most innocent.

    Read the law before you lie like this…

    171.205 discusses exactly a medical emergency. And sepsis would absolutely be a medical emergency. There was no need to even try and detect a heartbeat based on the bill to treat the mother. The exception is right there. The only people making this about abortion are the people who want to kill for convenience.

    https://capitol.texas.gov/tlodocs/87R/billtext/pdf/SB00008F.pdf
     
    • Dislike Dislike x 2
    • Like Like x 1
    • Winner Winner x 1
  10. Nov 2, 2024 #30
    AzCatFan

    AzCatFan GC Hall of Fame

    12,209
    1,157
    1,618
    Apr 9, 2007
    Then explain why the woman in the OP and others in Texas in similar situations died!
     
    • Optimistic Optimistic x 2
    • Dislike Dislike x 1
    • Fistbump/Thanks! Fistbump/Thanks! x 1
  11. Nov 2, 2024 #31
    QGator2414

    QGator2414 VIP Member

    18,421
    1,612
    1,308
    Aug 24, 2009
    Ocala
    Read the law!!!!

    171.205 defines the doctors did not even need to check for a heartbeat if it was a medical emergency. Sepsis is absolutely a medical emergency. Stop trying to make this about something it is not so you can get your legal killing for convenience.
     
    • Winner Winner x 2
    • Come On Man Come On Man x 2
    • Like Like x 1
  12. Nov 2, 2024 #32
    QGator2414

    QGator2414 VIP Member

    18,421
    1,612
    1,308
    Aug 24, 2009
    Ocala
    Read the law. Section 171.205 provided every bit of protection a doctor needed to treat this mother. This was malpractice in treatment and has nothing to do with the abortion law. The exception is written plenty clear. They did not even need to test for a heartbeat as sepsis is absolutely a medical emergency.
     
    Last edited: Nov 3, 2024
    • Winner Winner x 2
    • Like Like x 1
  13. Nov 2, 2024 #33
    QGator2414

    QGator2414 VIP Member

    18,421
    1,612
    1,308
    Aug 24, 2009
    Ocala
    Stop lying! Read the law. I posted it a few posts ago and provided you the section. The doctors did not even need to check for a heartbeat. Sepsis is an absolute medical emergency.
     
    • Like Like x 1
    • Dislike Dislike x 1
    • Winner Winner x 1
  14. Nov 2, 2024 #34
    FutureGatorMom

    FutureGatorMom Premium Member

    10,933
    1,255
    808
    Apr 3, 2007
    Florida
    • Dislike Dislike x 1
  15. Nov 2, 2024 #35
    FutureGatorMom

    FutureGatorMom Premium Member

    10,933
    1,255
    808
    Apr 3, 2007
    Florida
    Try and stop with the hemotion ok? I provided the link to the report. Is the family lying? Doctors don't want to act because the damn laws are vague. Your SCOTUS is making sweeping changes for the christian nationalist and women are DYING. Oh an by the way, the right also has, and in lots of states cap how much you can sue a doctor for, so whoo hoo to that malpractice thing you speak of I'm sure it brings her family tons of peace.
     
    • Dislike Dislike x 1
    • Come On Man Come On Man x 1
  16. Nov 2, 2024 #36
    AzCatFan

    AzCatFan GC Hall of Fame

    12,209
    1,157
    1,618
    Apr 9, 2007
    Then why have multiple women died?!?
     
    • Dislike Dislike x 1
    • Fistbump/Thanks! Fistbump/Thanks! x 1
    • Optimistic Optimistic x 1
  17. Nov 2, 2024 #37
    philnotfil

    philnotfil GC Hall of Fame

    17,727
    1,789
    1,718
    Apr 8, 2007
    Because they believed forum posters instead of reading the law for themselves?
     
    • Like Like x 1
    • Funny Funny x 1
    • Come On Man Come On Man x 1
  18. Nov 2, 2024 #38
    QGator2414

    QGator2414 VIP Member

    18,421
    1,612
    1,308
    Aug 24, 2009
    Ocala
    Nothing to do with the law for sure. Med mal is a real thing.
     
    • Like Like x 1
    • Come On Man Come On Man x 1
  19. Nov 2, 2024 #39
    QGator2414

    QGator2414 VIP Member

    18,421
    1,612
    1,308
    Aug 24, 2009
    Ocala
    Pure Stupidity…

    But when you want to legally allow the killing of the most innocent. Sadly fits.

    Read the Law!
     
    • Like Like x 1
  20. Nov 2, 2024 #40
    QGator2414

    QGator2414 VIP Member

    18,421
    1,612
    1,308
    Aug 24, 2009
    Ocala
    You just want to allow the legal killing of the most innocent for convenience. At least that is clear if you want to use this case as an example which has nothing to do with the Texas abortion law.

    We certainly disagree on the evil of abortion. But lying and using cases that have nothing to do with the law in Texas to push the legal killing of the most innocent speaks for itself. Glad I will not have to answer for that…:cool:
     
    • Like Like x 1
    • Disagree Bacon! Disagree Bacon! x 1
    • Winner Winner x 1
Page 2 of 6