Texas: Where healthcare just means more (if you’re a man)

Show me one law that keeps a woman from getting an abortion if her life is in jeopardy. That decision does not do that. It shows her life was not in jeopardy based on testimony from what I have seen.

Show me one single law that prevents an abortion if the woman’s life is in jeopardy.

 

I care immensely about protecting the most innocent among us.

 

Your site which has its own credibility issues gave a medium credibility lol.

 

Meh.

 

Tell that to the Glick family. And again, did the law protect Cox from following the same path? No. Only her leaving the state did.

 

The expected response.

 

Show me the law that does not allow a woman to get an abortion if her life is in jeopardy.

There will be times doctors fail the mother and times doctors fail the baby under Texas Law. But nothing in their law prohibits a mother from getting an abortion if her life is at risk.

I will stand with you against a state or government putting a law on the books that prohibits the mother from getting an abortion if her life is at risk. That is for the mother/her doctor/and those she wants advice from.

 

I showed you Glick, who died. I showed you the Cox ruling, based on the law. Did the law prevent Cox from following the same path and demise that Glick faced?

 

Show me one law that does not allow a woman to have an abortion if her life is in jeopardy. Not a terrible medical outcome that we all wish never happens.

I will stand with you against a state or government putting a law on the books that prohibits the mother from getting an abortion if her life is at risk. That is for the mother/her doctor/and those she wants advice from.

 

But if I have a desperate need for attention, can I keep ignoring reality and continue to post my opinion as fact?

 

Forget the law. Read the ruling. Tell me the law protected Cox from following the same path to death that Glick took. It didn't.

 

Again. Show me one law. Don’t get caught up in your emotion. I will stand with you. I hope as wrong. But it appears you are more concerned about legally killing the most innocent than protecting their life.

I will stand with you against any law that prohibits a woman from making a decision we wish on no one. Her Life verse another (her Child’s Life)!

But killing the child for convenience…I can’t support that.

 

Yes or no. Did the law protect Cox from following the same path to death as Glick?

 

Show me one law that does not allow a Mother to get an abortion if her mother is at risk.

Just one law.

Not a ruling on a case where the doctor testified the Mothers life was not at risk. Show me one Law that prohibits an abortion if the mothers life is at risk. I will stand with you against that law.

 

Based on the testimony posted. No. That does not mean doctors failed though. I don’t know.

Show me a law that does not protect a mothers life!

You cannot!

And if you do I will stand in support against it with you.

 

Abortion on demand until viability is coming and then we won't have to deal with 1/10th the amount of nonsense here.

You can move to Texas and start filing those $10K abortion lawsuits and, with a little luck, become a Longhorns fan.

 

So the law didn't protect Cox. The doctors didn't fail. The law did.

 

No. It did not. The problem is you want the law removed so even more of the most innocent can be killed. Otherwise you would cite where the law prohibits a mother from getting an abortion if her life is in danger. I will stand with you to defend a Mothers life being in danger. But I will not stand with what it appears you clearly want.

 

No one wants you standing with them. Just keep your damn nose out of other women's private....decisions.