Tennessee Republicans Seek to Ban Physics

Don’t know for certain, but my sense from the article is they have been conducting lab work and simulations. “The so-called stratospheric controlled perturbation experiment (SCoPEx) was expected to be the first such scientific effort conducted in the stratosphere. But it proved controversial from the start and, in the end, others may have beaten them across the line of deliberately releasing reflective materials into that layer of the atmosphere.”

 

so there's zero indication that the federal government has released chemicals like this. And the bill is just to make sure they don't ever do it ... at least over Tennessee.

 

Agreed. The language of the bill even said the government may release, not that the government had released. The article referenced in the OP confused this issue with chemtrail conspiracy theories. They are two different subjects.

By the way, I’ve always chuckled at the chemtrail theories because even if some chemical was released at 30,000 feet, by the time it hit the ground the concentration would be so low from dispersion that it couldn’t do any effect.

 

it looks like pretty much everyone covered that as a bill to prevent chemtrails. Including the Nashville paper

Tennessee Senate passes bill banning 'chemtrails': What to know

 

You’re correct. Your article is the same one from the OP, but I’ve seen others doing the same thing. There is a lot of lazy journalism out there, if you can call it journalism. Somebody publishes an article, even a bad one, and other sources merely copy that article and reprint it. Here’s a hilarious one. This guy’s expertise is in frequent flyer miles, and yet he publishes the following:

“legislators in Tennessee are convinced that [contrails are] really government weather control experiments, or targeting of civilians with poison – and the state’s senate has passed legislation to ban “chemtrails” within the state’s borders.”

Conspiracy In Tennessee: State Senate Votes To Ban Weather Controlling Chemtrails From Planes - View from the Wing

 

Do you live in Tennessee?

If not, why do you care what they do?

 

But the title of the thread is still totally wrong nowhere does it suggest they want to ban physics..

 

What is your source for this? According to the website of the Tennessee General Assembly, the following was the original language of the bill:

“BE IT ENACTED BY THE GENERAL ASSEMBLY OF THE STATE OF TENNESSEE:
SECTION 1. Tennessee Code Annotated, Section 68-201-105(d)(1), is amended by deleting "one hundred eighty (180)" and substituting "one hundred fifty (150)".

SECTION 2. This act takes effect July 1, 2024, the public welfare requiring it.”

The bill was referred to the Senate Energy, Agriculture, and Natural Resources Committee. The bill was amended to include the prohibition of releasing chemicals into the atmosphere for the purposes of modifying the environment.

The Senate adopted Amendment 1, SA0653. The Senate then passed bill SB2691, as amended, 25 to 6.

What do you consider the original “insane” language to have been when the bill was passed? That’s why I would like to see the source of your statements. It seems to me that what you describe does not follow parliamentary procedure. How is language added to a Senate bill after the bill has already passed? Your second article does not address this.

 

EDITED: I'll bet real money that many of these negative posters never took one clot shot and risked their lives for this dangerous vaccine.

 

You're correct. I've had 5. The vaccine is only dangerous in your alternate universe.

 

Why did you open and post in the thread?

 

The Pennsylvania state senator proposing the bill there has made it quite clear that he thinks chemtrails are being released now.

https://penncapital-star.com/energy...ted-in-conspiracy-theory-and-climate-science/

 

Harsh take for someone who reads the bill as "seek[ing] to ban physics." One of the problems with discussing politics in this country is when we have the tendency to exaggerate where it just isn't necessary. The bill seems silly on its surface without the need to exaggerate or misrepresent. Nevermind whether or not one believes in chemtrails past, present, or future. How much energy/effort would be spent on testing air samples and chasing down sources for discovered anomalies?

Go GATORS!
,WESGATORS

 

I mean, who doesn't love a good state joke?

Go GATORS!
,WESGATORS

 

Curiosity.

What they are doing doesn’t get me all contorted.

 

Looks like the chemtrail mind control is working

 

Ok. Lol

 

I’m not going to defend whackadoodle statements from anybody. I’ve already stated that I do not believe chemtrail conspiracies. It’s interesting that in the article you referenced it also says this:

“Mastriano notes the Pennsylvania Constitution guarantees the ‘right to clean air, pure water, and to the preservation of the natural, scenic, historic and esthetic values of the environment.’

‘Spraying unknown, experimental, and potentially dangerous chemicals into the atmosphere without the consent of the people of Pennsylvania is a clear violation of Article 1, Section 27 of the PA Constitution,’ Mastriano’s memo states.”

That’s a statement any liberal environmentalist could make. So it brings up an interesting issue. Can someone do the right thing for the wrong reasons?

Let me ask you this. Do you support releasing chemicals into the atmosphere to alter the weather?