Supreme Court to consider overruling Chevron doctrine

How will it stop special interests from writing expansive laws into the USC by the pen stroke signing of members of Congress? Congress has no idea how any of the laws they write actually get administered by the Executive branch. Perhaps all these “negligent” [sic] officials just move over to the Legislative branch to write the law into the Code?

 

It will mean important stuff will never get done. Much if the work of government is done by the agencies, demanding that every single action is explicitly spelled out is a recipe for disaster. It will go about as well as the abortion ruling went, probably worse.
But given Gorsuch has argued against this for years and Roberts has expressed doubts prior, a majority is almost locked in already.

 

Seems like this would leave it up to Congress to decide if they’re going to listen to the experts on an issue, or the special interest groups that provide campaign contributions.

 

If you think the country is ungovernable now ...

 

Actually what you will get is the judicial branch performing the function of the executive branch because its just going to be suit after suit over how various laws function in practice, supreme court justices deciding how much carbon is legal or how much poison you can ingest without violating a law from 1927.

 

The laws are written in very vague ways, the agencies that oversee them need more details. Up until now they have been entrusted with coming up with the details.

Now congress will have write laws that are much more detailed, like thousands more pages of details, or (more likely) nothing will get done. And the people funding the judges and congress members pushing for this are very happy to pay millions of dollars to get that outcome.

Why do you think they are willing to spend so many millions of dollars to end the protections that keep Americans safe?

 

By 9 people who have no idea about anything those laws are meant to address? Great idea man!

 

I think I understand that you are saying government agencies shouldn't be writing "laws" that people or companies have to comply with without going through the congress. How is that different from a president issuing an executive order? I'm truly not that knowledgeable about the legal aspects of either way.

 

Politicians pose for pics and fund raise. Clowns mostly don’t even have a global view, let alone an in the weeds knowledge base. So their staffers will have to do it, oh wait, they are politicians in training

the bureaucracy runs things. Shocking, I know

 

Another longstanding gop wet dream: to get rid of the EPA. Clean air, water, and soil is vastly overrated.

 

Such as?

 

Remove discretion from Executive Branch agencies and expect much more of this:
You elected them to write new laws. They’re letting corporations do it instead. – Center for Public Integrity

While the story focuses on state legislatures it also happens at the federal level and if the Chevron doctrine is overturned expect the scenario to occur much more frequently.

 

Apologies for my lack of clarity in writing What are the more pressing issues at stake here?