Still Missing from all the Indictments...

Whose $20 are you using?

 

All I see is multiple indictments with little evidence in public to support them. The timing is beyond suspicious. And by the way. Against a person I will not be voting for in the primary. The ironic thing is you are so concerned with Trump. I am concerned with what is happening and the repercussions going forward. Both sides should be concerned!

 

So you remain unconcerned with a president who has zero regard for the rule of law, who has no compunction on breaking the law. Yet, you are concerned about “timing.”

Let’s talk about timing. Trump, who absolutely knew indictments were imminent, moved up his “announcement” that he was running for President to one of the earliest announcements ever, so that he could say that he was being charged BECAUSE HE WAS RUNNING.

Aren’t you concerned at all with Trump’s timing?

And, even if you are concerned with “timing”, doesn’t “timing” take a back seat to the more pressing issue of prosecuting a man for breaking some of our most precious laws? Laws that run to the foundation of our government? Laws that if allowed to be disregarded would dismantle our democratic way of life?

In context, “timing” is a laughable excuse that is easily and readily exposed for the bogus deflection that it was always intended to be.

 

No. But if you want. When all these cases are over and Trump is guilty or not guilty. Let’s meet up for a beer and if guilty. I pay. Not guilty you pay.

 

Huh?

 

I’ll have beers with you, but I’m not toasting to whether Trump wins or loses. I find the subject to be one of the saddest and ugliest moments in our Country’s history.

 

What law has he broken?

 

That is fine. I wish Trump would not run. I would absolutely vote for him again and think he was a great President. But he has been demonized to a point that I wish he would step to the side and help from behind the scenes.

 

We get it. You are fully aware of the witness testimony and exhibits that support the indictment because you read the January 6 report, read the supporting witness testimony, examined the exhibits thst reviews including the emails, and you have determined that none of the evidence supports the charges or that Trump did anything wrong. Everything thst occurred, as charged in the indictments, was Normal and non-criminal. I believe you aren’t ignoring it and that, for you, things like the submission of fake electors and asking Mike Pence to send the votes back to the states to consider those fake delegates was perfectly proper. Did you hear Pence publicly corroborate the indictment? Do you believe him? And that there was nothing wrong with Trump telling Raffensberger he could be prosecuted and asking him to find 11,000 more votes. Did you hear the tape? Or wanting the Acting AG to falsely allege there was election fraud and that it was investigating, and that when the acting AG told him that this was false, telling the acting AG to just release the letter and leave the rest to Trump and the Republicans in Congress. Did you hear the Acting AG’s testimony to the January 6 committee? Because this is your normal. All good for you. The actions of, in your words, “a great president.”

 

The Jan 6 report is a joke. It was done by a partisan committee looking for an answer. But you keep following the narrative you are sold.

 

I meant to say possibility, not probability.

 

Still waiting for someone to lay out a plausible explanation for using a tweet that tells people to turn on the news as evidence of a crime.

 

Was that from Georgia? Educate yourself on RICO prosecutions before you look even sillier.

 

Hi Tilly,

Got you. I don’t believe its even being talked about or even on the table tight now. Too early

 

. Then we can safely assume that you disregarded the report and read the testimony that was linked. From All the people I referenced. All Republicans. Trump appointees and elected Arizona and Georgia GOP officials. It is quite evident that you agree with the behavior those witnesses described, some of which I summarized. And that is the subject of the indictments, which you have obviously read. Because you have openly said you have seen no evidence of wrongdoing. Testimony is evidence. And that testimony supports the facts alleged in the indictments

 

No "standing" sounds like no justice to me... It would have been brought up at some point in time. There were plenty of voting irregularities in the 2020 election cycle.