Welcome home, fellow Gator.

The Gator Nation's oldest and most active insider community
Join today!

Some Republicans are considering impeaching Janet Protasiewicz, here's how we got here

Discussion in 'Too Hot for Swamp Gas' started by G8tas, Sep 1, 2023.

  1. G8tas

    G8tas GC Hall of Fame

    4,270
    847
    453
    Sep 22, 2008
    MADISON, Wis. (AP) — Even before the newly elected justice who gave liberals a one-seat majority on the Wisconsin Supreme Court has heard a case, Republican lawmakers are talking about taking the unprecedented step of impeaching and removing her from office.

    And they have the votes to do it.

    Republicans worry that the legislative districts they drew 12 years ago, which are widely viewed as among the most gerrymandered in the country, will be undone in one of the court’s first actions under liberal control. It’s a legitimate concern, as Democratic-friendly groups brought two lawsuits in the first week of newly elected Justice Janet Protasiewicz’s term asking the new liberal-controlled court to toss the maps.

    Wisconsin's new liberal Supreme Court justice hasn't heard a case but Republicans may impeach
     
    • Informative Informative x 6
  2. G8tas

    G8tas GC Hall of Fame

    4,270
    847
    453
    Sep 22, 2008
    Looks like a redistricting case will be coming up and the GOP needs to do anything it can to remain in power. Unfortunately they have the votes in the house and senate to do it
     
    • Informative Informative x 1
  3. Gatorrick22

    Gatorrick22 GC Hall of Fame

    87,139
    26,102
    4,613
    Apr 3, 2007
    Politics is dirty game... for all politicians.
     
    • Winner Winner x 1
  4. sierragator

    sierragator GC Hall of Fame

    15,086
    13,172
    1,853
    Apr 8, 2007
    So to hell with what the voters of Wisconsin want, impeach her ass and get someone the gop likes instead. Sounds like representative government to me. :rolleyes:
     
  5. swampbabe

    swampbabe GC Hall of Fame

    3,635
    912
    2,643
    Apr 8, 2007
    Viera, FL
    A couple of years ago, Wisconsin’s gerrymandered map was part of an FRQ on the AP US Government exam. Kids had to explain how 50% of the voters got 75% of the seats. If a 16/17 year old can figure it out …
     
    • Like Like x 2
    • Winner Winner x 2
    • Fistbump/Thanks! Fistbump/Thanks! x 1
    • Informative Informative x 1
  6. gator_lawyer

    gator_lawyer VIP Member

    16,033
    5,553
    3,213
    Oct 30, 2017
    A couple interesting issues here:
    1. Tony Evers, the Democratic Governor, would appoint the replacement. So the Republicans would likely only succeed in enraging the voters.
    2. Protasiewicz could sue in state court to invalidate the impeachment. Wisconsin's constitution has both impeachment and something called removal by address. Removal by address explicitly applies to state supreme court justices. Whether impeachment does is an open question. Removal by address requires two-thirds majority in both chambers. The GOP only has a two-thirds majority in the Senate. So they can't remove Protasiewicz by address.

    If I'm Protasiewicz's lawyer, I file a case in Madison or Milwaukee arguing that the Wisconsin Constitution requires removal by address for state supreme court justices because it is the more specific provision. I file in one of those two venues because both are dominated judges who align with the Democratic Party. Since the Wisconsin Supreme Court will be 3-3, that means if they deadlock, the court of appeals's opinion controls. Basically, that means liberal judges will get to decide the issue.
     
    • Informative Informative x 5
    • Like Like x 2
    • Best Post Ever Best Post Ever x 1
  7. Emmitto

    Emmitto VIP Member

    8,781
    1,619
    933
    Apr 3, 2007
    R’s are bewildered why otherwise bystanders like me will crawl over broken glass to vote for anything other than them.
     
    • Winner Winner x 7
    • Agree Agree x 2
    • Fistbump/Thanks! Fistbump/Thanks! x 2
    • Like Like x 1
  8. GatorJMDZ

    GatorJMDZ gatorjack VIP Member

    24,365
    2,497
    1,868
    Apr 3, 2007
    You're hired.
     
    • Like Like x 6
    • Funny Funny x 1
  9. philnotfil

    philnotfil GC Hall of Fame

    17,541
    1,737
    1,718
    Apr 8, 2007
    I'm old enough to remember when Republicans were for democracy.
     
    • Like x 4
    • Agree x 3
    • Fistbump/Thanks! x 1
    • Funny x 1
    • Come On Man x 1
  10. GatorJMDZ

    GatorJMDZ gatorjack VIP Member

    24,365
    2,497
    1,868
    Apr 3, 2007
    I'm even older, I remember when they were considered to be the smart ones.
     
    • Winner Winner x 3
    • Funny Funny x 2
    • Like Like x 1
    • Agree Agree x 1
  11. flgator2

    flgator2 Premium Member

    6,343
    638
    2,113
    Apr 3, 2007
    Gainesville
    We still are the smart ones.
     
    • Funny Funny x 3
  12. flgator2

    flgator2 Premium Member

    6,343
    638
    2,113
    Apr 3, 2007
    Gainesville
    [​IMG]

    From the man who claims to be a republican but supports crooks, smart enough to recognize bullshit when I see it
     
  13. citygator

    citygator VIP Member

    10,701
    2,403
    3,303
    Apr 3, 2007
    Charlotte
    [​IMG]
     
    • Funny Funny x 1
  14. flgator2

    flgator2 Premium Member

    6,343
    638
    2,113
    Apr 3, 2007
    Gainesville
    Funny that how I see you but I'll admit you're one of the smarter ones from your looney side
     
  15. VAg8r1

    VAg8r1 GC Hall of Fame

    20,160
    1,629
    1,763
    Apr 8, 2007
    Really? A party with a large percentage of working class voters who gladly donate their heard earned income to a billionaire is not a sign of intellect.
     
    • Funny Funny x 2
    • Like Like x 1
  16. Trickster

    Trickster VIP Member

    9,683
    2,374
    3,233
    Sep 20, 2014
    Attempts to disenfranchise voters is almost exclusively the playbook of today’s GOP. THERE IS NO EQUIVALENCY HERE, ZERO!
     
    • Agree Agree x 1
    • Winner Winner x 1
  17. GatorJMDZ

    GatorJMDZ gatorjack VIP Member

    24,365
    2,497
    1,868
    Apr 3, 2007
    It's getting even slimier. Republicans are now considering impeaching her in their House, but not having a trial in their Senate. Apparently under state law, she would be suspended if they voted to impeach. They don't think they have the votes in the Senate to convict, so this way they would effectively neutralize her and deny the citizens the liberal leaning court they overwhelmingly voted for.
     
    • Informative Informative x 3
  18. WarDamnGator

    WarDamnGator GC Hall of Fame

    10,468
    1,302
    1,718
    Apr 8, 2007
    She needs to enact Gator_Lawyers plan from post #6 ... like yesterday ...
     
    • Fistbump/Thanks! Fistbump/Thanks! x 1
    • Winner Winner x 1
  19. channingcrowderhungry

    channingcrowderhungry Premium Member

    8,606
    1,912
    3,013
    Apr 3, 2007
    Bottom of a pint glass
    The GOP strategy is to kick Democracy in the nards and assume their constituents are so full of hate they don't care. Bold plan. May work short term
     
    • Winner Winner x 1
  20. uftaipan

    uftaipan GC Hall of Fame

    8,618
    2,005
    1,483
    May 31, 2007
    Fresno, CA
    Do they have the votes in the Senate?