Scenario: Trump Wins The Election. Democracy Hangs By A Thread. What Should We Do?

I made a meaningful comment in light of recent events. It was not simply a bump for bumping sake. We are now in the window of time where we can see the results of these speculations play out, which makes commentary on this thread relevant to this moment in time.

Since the thread started we have seen multiple assassination attempts on Trump, and we are now seeing a possible scenario where politicians could hinder the election results from being certified. That is relevant to the thread.

 

Fact Check: False. I have stated in the past how I stand with Mike Pence's decision to certify the election results in 2020 (see below), who I thought could make a difference for our country when I voted for him in the 2016 election. It turns out that he did.

 

I also voted for the guy who stopped him by certifying the election results, and Pence being on the ticket was one of the reasons I voted for Trump.

A vote does not equal an endorsement of every aspect of a candidate's platform. For most Americans all a vote represents is a preference for one candidate/platform over another candidate/platform. If we fail to express that preference other people such as you will make that decision for us whilst you literally hide everything dark and evil about your preferred candidate in the closet and under the rug while only shining a spotlight on the other candidate's flaws.

Only when you are willing to consider moving the spotlight over to the bloodlust and totalitarian tendencies of your preferred alternative will a productive conversation be possible about this subject. I don't think you are capable or willing to do that, though.

 

You bring up rape as an argument, but it actually sets the table to expose how evil it is of you to vote for the alternative. It leaves you with nowhere to hide when it comes to defending the abortion issue. You see legally in this country minors cannot consent to sexual relations with adults. We call that rape. And if you accept that, then you know full well that a baby in the womb cannot consent either since an unborn baby is much much younger than the typical minor-aged rape victim. However, the rape victim has one advantage over the unborn baby when their consent is violated. They sometimes actually live to testify in court against their abusers to see their abusers brought to justice. The unborn who do not give consent to anyone to be burned alive with chemicals, to be dismembered, or to be starved to death by pills that cut off their food supply, they do not get a day in court to get justice. You, the person who votes for this barbaric practice as if it is some kind of holy sacrament, are their abuser because you cast your vote for that kind of abominable behavior. That is because people like you don't care one bit about their precious little lives. Trump is one man. That is the scale we are talking about...one man, but you advocate something which is almost identical in nature, on a scale of millions and billions of people, since the goal of the DNC is to spread this horrific treatment of human beings to the entire world. Not a single vote for Trump is a vote to legalize rape. Every single vote for the DNC is a vote to violate millions of unborn human beings in a manner that is as gruesome or even worse than rape.

 

C&P his response here. According to Scrbbr it is most likely 100% AI generated. My initial post he was responding to was most likely 100% handwritten based on the same AI detector.

https://www.scribbr.com/ai-detector/

@tilly I know there is not a rule on the books for this, but posting AI responses…is that something the moderators have discussed?

 

My response to your AI generated rebuttal is this: malice can be codified into law. That is what slavery was. It made slavery no more moral than abortion is. Slavery was legalized malice towards a group of people. So, we can both agree that malice can be ruled as constitutional by judge or a court. Ultimately, the power to change malicious legal systems rests in the hands of those who are empowered to change the system. You the voter are empowered to change and alter the system if it becomes legal to maliciously violate another human being. It is actually your moral obligation to change the system if it maliciously abuses other human beings. You have proven you are unwilling to punch your ballot to stop the malicious destruction of millions of people. So, stop lecturing us about the malicious treatment of human beings because you seem to be completely fine with it.