Welcome home, fellow Gator.

The Gator Nation's oldest and most active insider community
Join today!
  1. Hi there... Can you please quickly check to make sure your email address is up to date here? Just in case we need to reach out to you or you lose your password. Muchero thanks!

RFK Jr.

Discussion in 'Too Hot for Swamp Gas' started by okeechobee, Jun 20, 2023.

  1. okeechobee

    okeechobee GC Hall of Fame

    10,837
    1,420
    678
    Sep 11, 2022
    Ehmm, the WIV specializes in gain of function research on coronaviruses. It's literally what. they. do. If it were that futile of an effort, they wouldn't be pouring billions of dollars into it. And they wouldn't be 50-100 years ahead of the rest of the world if they did this. Pulling numbers out of your ass. China has successfully launched a hypersonic missile that circled the globe and then hit its target on the ground. The missile can carry a nuclear warhead. They may just be more capable than you're giving credit for.
     
  2. mrhansduck

    mrhansduck GC Hall of Fame

    4,868
    1,003
    1,788
    Nov 23, 2021


    RFK Jr.: “The crazies are taking over the world. …We’re in the apocalypse now. This is like the dystopia that I think all of us imagined would happen sometime in the future.”
     
  3. duggers_dad

    duggers_dad GC Hall of Fame

    16,473
    1,208
    2,088
    Jan 5, 2022
    Fact-Checked: True
     
  4. l_boy

    l_boy 5500

    13,024
    1,742
    3,268
    Jan 6, 2009
    When I heard them on a podcast sometime back, most of their case was a series of anecdotal happenings that they don’t believe could be a coincidence. The lab being in the same place as the virus origin (even though the lab is something like 15 miles away from the wet market and almost all of the first cases were around the wet market) or lab employees getting sick in November (but people get sick all he time, there is no evidence that I know that it was Covid)

    That Eddie Holmes episode you had posted was by far the most compelling account I have heard on the issue.
     
  5. l_boy

    l_boy 5500

    13,024
    1,742
    3,268
    Jan 6, 2009
    I don’t totally disagree with him, but in an entirely different context.
     
  6. ncargat1

    ncargat1 VIP Member

    14,461
    6,326
    3,353
    Dec 11, 2009
    Investigators from outside of China and those inside of China have continued to find no evidence of these supposed illnesses among lab employees in November of 2019. This what I mean when I say that we have no proof one way or the other, but people are making stuff up, or believing it from Twitter and turning it into "fact" and then use it as the foundation of their position. Heck, even the Trump State Department, who did blame WIV for a lab leak, had to admit that they found no evidence of these mysterious non-existent ill workers

    THAT is not science, nor is that even proper investigative technique.

    https://2017-2021.state.gov/fact-sheet-activity-at-the-wuhan-institute-of-virology/index.html
     
    Last edited: Jun 23, 2023
  7. ncargat1

    ncargat1 VIP Member

    14,461
    6,326
    3,353
    Dec 11, 2009
    No, that is not what the Wuhan Institute of Virology specializes in. They specialize in studying coronaviruses. Study viral kinetics through studying chimeric viruses (note - this is not the same as engineering a new virus from scratch. In a chemiric virus, the backbones of the spliced viruses are easily sequenced and identified). We, the United States pours $Millions into that very same research. Prof Ralph Baric, right here at the University of North Carolia, has been studying corona viruses, including extensive "gain of function" research on coronaviruses for years. You know why? Here is a hint...the same reason that Shi Zhengli is doing that research in China. The only difference is, she saw first hand was a SARS-Like virus could do when SARS-1 broke out in China in 2002 and 2004

    Meanwhile, you understand nothing about what is required to conjure up a virus from scratch. Neither do I, but the people who are experts do, and according to them, we are decades away from being able to do that, if ever with the current state of the art knowledge and technology.

    Finally, why would you pull in an example and a technological field not even remotely related, and one that is far simpler in terms of technological achievement with our current level of technology?

    I completely dismiss the idea that the Chinese created a brand new to this earth virus from scratch. Now, if we find evidence that they found this previously in nature and were experimenting with it and someone carried it to the market, so be it, I will be wrong. However, considering that the simplist answer is usually the one that is correct, it is far more likely an infected natural reservoir came in contact with a human and yet another pandemic as a result of zoonotic transmission was started.
     
    Last edited: Jun 23, 2023
    • Agree Agree x 1
    • Informative Informative x 1
  8. mrhansduck

    mrhansduck GC Hall of Fame

    4,868
    1,003
    1,788
    Nov 23, 2021
    We are living in interesting times, but dystopian apocalypse seems pretty dramatic.
     
  9. duggers_dad

    duggers_dad GC Hall of Fame

    16,473
    1,208
    2,088
    Jan 5, 2022
    upload_2023-6-23_15-23-1.jpeg
     
  10. VAg8r1

    VAg8r1 GC Hall of Fame

    21,481
    1,794
    1,763
    Apr 8, 2007
    Getting back to the issue of RFK, Jr. as a candidate, if he is even on the ballot I expect him to end up with no more than 10% of the vote in any primary against Joe Biden. Keep in mind that he will be running in Democratic primaries and Republicans are much more likely to buy into his conspiracy theories than Democrats. My guess is that reason he polled as high as 20% in the first poll was because a number of respondents were liberals who were totally unaware of his wacky anti-vax history and viewed him as a left-wing alternative to Biden based on the family name.
     
    Last edited: Jun 24, 2023
  11. duggers_dad

    duggers_dad GC Hall of Fame

    16,473
    1,208
    2,088
    Jan 5, 2022
    (1) say “wacky anti-vax” three times.

    (2) click your heels.

    (3) pretend that excess deaths aren’t happening in highly vaccinated countries.
     
  12. ncargat1

    ncargat1 VIP Member

    14,461
    6,326
    3,353
    Dec 11, 2009
    Here is your modern day Republi-ban party and their anti-vax, anti-science hench-tards in action. Dr. Peter Hotez, developer of a low cost, low tech vaccine that was given away to poor countries is being stalked, threatened and now his wife and children are being stalked and threatened. So much so, that the Houston PD, state police and FBI have to protect him and his family while he is travelling.

     
    Last edited: Jun 24, 2023
  13. l_boy

    l_boy 5500

    13,024
    1,742
    3,268
    Jan 6, 2009
    I was looking at a Twitter thread and it’s brutal. Ackman, a hedge fund guy tweeted this compendium of Hotez saying contradictory statements, ignoring the context that the situation changed with variants as new information came in, and the Twitter morons are just piling on.

    He wouldn’t stoop to it but I’d like to see Dr Paul Offit debate RFK Jr. He is an encyclopedia of diseases and vaccine history and seems pretty unflappable.
     
  14. ncargat1

    ncargat1 VIP Member

    14,461
    6,326
    3,353
    Dec 11, 2009
    Latest information released form the Office of the Director of National Intelligence. Information continues to show no clear source is none yet. However, this latest release is in opposition to the people who continue to claim that the virus was "created" in WIV. This won't deter RFK, Rogon, Musk or all of the other will-ignorants however.

    Science | AAAS
     
  15. duggers_dad

    duggers_dad GC Hall of Fame

    16,473
    1,208
    2,088
    Jan 5, 2022
    You could say that Offit is a leading practitioner of the dark arts.
     
  16. okeechobee

    okeechobee GC Hall of Fame

    10,837
    1,420
    678
    Sep 11, 2022
    Joe Rogan had something like $1,000,000 lined up to go to Hotez’s charity of choice and Hotez still declined to debate RFK Jr under the “I’m too good to debate RFK Jr” pretense. But Hotez has been so outspoken about how important it is to contain misinformation about Covid. Why don’t one of these geniuses take the debate and destroy RFK Jr if he’s such a fruit loop? Seems easy enough to do if he is the loon you portray him as. The “I won’t debate him, because I don’t want to give him a larger platform” cop-out doesn’t really fly when all the big dogs are already interviewing RFK Jr daily. RFK probably turning down interviews at this point, because his schedule is filled with big names wanting to interview him.
     
  17. l_boy

    l_boy 5500

    13,024
    1,742
    3,268
    Jan 6, 2009
    Because it is hard to debate someone who has a completely different set of facts. So RFK Jr references some conspiracy about a vaccine study that was squashed, or some anecdotes or series of anecdotes, and you can’t directly address them, because you have never heard of them. All you can do is respond with actual real studies, to which RFK will say somebody involved is linked to pharma, and you can’t trust the experts, and it’s all a conspiracy. It’s impossible to debate someone who asserts real facts are fake due to conspiracy.

    It would take someone who spent time digging up the misinformation and running it down in advance as preparation. Most scientists and physicians are not focusing their time on disinformation. They are focusing on actual science.
     
    • Winner Winner x 1
  18. okeechobee

    okeechobee GC Hall of Fame

    10,837
    1,420
    678
    Sep 11, 2022
    That’s not the reason being given for the cop-out, even if that was a valid reason to begin with. Hotez has spent an enormous amount of time talking about “misinformation” and about why he won’t debate RFK Jr. If he can devote that much of his time discussing things that are not “actual science”, I think he can debate RFK for a couple of hours.

    Imagine if Joe Biden used the same excuse not to debate Trump. Even the leftist media would excoriate Biden and according to many, Trump has all sorts of conspiracies and lies. That’s simply not a valid reason to not debate someone you spend an awful lot of time trying to discredit. Hotez is a pussy.
     
  19. l_boy

    l_boy 5500

    13,024
    1,742
    3,268
    Jan 6, 2009
    debating is a tradition in politics. Having said that, the first Biden / Trump debate was a complete shit show.

    Science is not something that lends itself to debate, at least in front of the masses. Who “wins” a debate in the court of public opinion has nothing to do with the truth of the science. Just because a scientist/physician may not be a skilled debater doesn’t make him any less competent in science.

    It is pretty much certain that RFK fans will think he “won” the debate regardless of what happens, and by giving him that opportunity you have given him validity.

    Sure I’d like to see somebody competent debate RFK, but not if they aren’t a skilled debater.

    Sam Harris was asked several times to debate Bret Weinstein on Covid and stuff like ivermectin. He refused to do it because he said he would not no way to anticipate or address out of left field claims that Weinstein could some up with.
     
    • Winner Winner x 1
  20. okeechobee

    okeechobee GC Hall of Fame

    10,837
    1,420
    678
    Sep 11, 2022
    I think if you are too cowardly to raise hundreds of thousands of dollars for charity and do a two hour debate with RFK Jr, you should just STFU about policing "misinformation", people spreading "misinformation." If you can't even debate the information for hundreds of thousands of dollars to charity, then you're a sad sack of shit for a scientist. Think of all the people he could have helped with that donation money. The guy is a selfish, low-life, egotistical bastard who hangs out on MSNBC where everybody fawns over him, like the weak-minded government shills they are. I wouldn't be so harsh if he didn't constantly drone on about the "misinformation." If your #1 objective is to censor a large amount of people and you don't even have balls to have a debate which would raise hundreds of thousands of dollars to go to charity, that is the very definition of a pussy and a scumbag.
     
    • Dislike Dislike x 3