Prime's Colorado likely headed to Big 12 championship game

So you don't have a team that is also injury ridden like us that's still playing well ?

 

What was Miami ranked when they came to Gainesville? I remember the narrative of the losing coach would mostly likely be the first fired. Texas AM wasn’t ranked. And on their qb2. That was a winnable game. Then there was the coaching mind freeze in Tennessee.

 

Who cares what they were ranked when the rankings weren't informed by better data?

 

If he were winning multiple championships, most would get over it but he wouldnt be a choice of most gators, likely boosters either.

 

Of course not. Not sure what part of I didn't expect them to win is not getting through. Winning and embarrassed are on the opposite ends of the spectrum, I at least expected something in between.

 

It must have been the staff that got AR injured in highschool college and both years in the pros.

 

You could've just posted "Billy bad" to begin with since you obviously had no point related to rankings.

 

The point is that the teams were not ranked when they when Florida lost to them. The fact that are ranked now is either meaningless or use the same new data to rank them to judge Napier

 

If we were at full stright , which we werent even close, maybe we at least make it interesting. Theres just no way to compete with lesser talent and Warner. Im not down on tge kid at all because he is tge best we have and hes a gator but its just an impossible situation. We are just depleted. Hopefully we are healthier for lsu and if DJ is back, we give it a good shot. No DJ and bacups at corner and we are toast.

 

Whether tgey were misranked or not has nothing to do with what happened on the field. If it did, we wouldn't need playoffs, we could just hand out trophies based on sportswriters opinions.

 

Again, who cares what they were ranked at the time? Who isn't using the new data to rank Napier?

 

I get the feeling the the combined EIQ in this conversation is very low….

 

Theres only facts. If we were at full strength, we probably lose a closer game.

 

They were ranked top 20 (19th) A&M was 20th. Does that help you prove nothing? My point still stands, we obviously are not a top 20 team but in a conference where our best team may just end up with 2 losses, and a schedule that had 8 top 20 teams on it. We beat the teams (so far) that we should beat and lost to the top 20 ranked teams we faced (so far) that is an improvement from previous years when we lost to unranked teams(teams we should have beat) that's improvement some would say. But it's hard to figure out where we would truly stand when playing a ranked non SEC team that has not been tested vs real teams or has lost to teams both better and worse than them. Essentially we could be just outside of the top 25 had our schedule allowed for cannibalism among the members.

Would anyone say that Colorado is a better team than say a Bama team if Bama was to end up with 3 losses to Colorado's 2? These records are so apples to oranges among teams in the top25 rankings it's truly difficult to know who is better than who because some have been battle tested and some have not.