Welcome home, fellow Gator.

The Gator Nation's oldest and most active insider community
Join today!

Politicians Opposing Student Loan Forgiveness, Yet Had PPP Loans Forgiven

Discussion in 'Too Hot for Swamp Gas' started by ncargat1, Jan 26, 2024.

  1. Gator715

    Gator715 GC Hall of Fame

    6,848
    835
    2,103
    Dec 6, 2015
    That's a pretty weak appeal to hypocrisy in light of the context and differences.

    Sometimes people just like shouting pejoratives for the sake of doing just that, without any rhyme, reason, or method to the madness apart from tribal politics.
     
    • Winner Winner x 3
  2. G8trGr8t

    G8trGr8t Premium Member

    30,942
    11,927
    3,693
    Aug 26, 2008
    Why shouldn't they be paid back by companies who experienced minimal disruption? If you lost 20% of previoys year revenue, forgive 20%..instead 100% forgiveness regardless of revenue loss.
     
    • Like Like x 1
  3. murphree_hall

    murphree_hall VIP Member

    8,787
    4,416
    2,898
    Jul 11, 2019
    My usual sales revenue was about $160k per month. I was getting 30-50% of that during the first 6 months of the pandemic with no assistance. It was brutal. My employees stick with me and I felt I owed it to them and their families to help them through. We did a lot of building improvement projects when we had no customers. We repainted the shops, fixed things, cleaned up, organized tools, got rid of junk, landscaped, and did training. Things we normally didn’t have time for. When things started picking back up, we were better as a result.
     
    • Like Like x 6
  4. Contra

    Contra GC Hall of Fame

    1,327
    339
    178
    May 15, 2023
    Whatever salary they paid to the analyst/researcher to dig this dirt up….not sure they got their money’s worth from him/her/xyr/it. It seems like a petty attempt to whine about hypocrisy.
     
    • Agree Agree x 2
  5. murphree_hall

    murphree_hall VIP Member

    8,787
    4,416
    2,898
    Jul 11, 2019
    Well part of it is that the loans didn’t replace 100% of the revenue. It was based upon headcount and previous payroll, not total revenue.
     
    • Agree Agree x 1
  6. G8trGr8t

    G8trGr8t Premium Member

    30,942
    11,927
    3,693
    Aug 26, 2008
    Very familiar with it. Also very familiar with multiple firms that had minimal disruption and profitted handsomely from the forgiveness as they had their expenses covered by the taxpayer. Even at 50% revenue loss, if the loans covered 100% of your labor and rent you ended up ahead unless your margins are ridiculously high. And you got the benefit of the improvements you made to your business and your employees. The loan forgiveness should be based on proven loss of revenue year over year. How much is revenue compared to total of labor, rent, utilities? We run around 75 - 80%
     
    • Like Like x 1
  7. murphree_hall

    murphree_hall VIP Member

    8,787
    4,416
    2,898
    Jul 11, 2019
    Well, I don’t disagree completely, but this isn’t really a rebuttal to what I posted. My point is that it wasn’t the complete scam or abuse that many say it was as a blanket statement.
     
    • Agree Agree x 3
  8. g8trdoc

    g8trdoc Premium Member

    3,501
    466
    353
    Apr 3, 2007
    I can’t agree more. All of this was political. Both republicans and democrats are to blame.
     
  9. G8trGr8t

    G8trGr8t Premium Member

    30,942
    11,927
    3,693
    Aug 26, 2008
    Well covid was real and the need to close things down until it could be managed was real. And companies in certain industries certainly needed some help keeping people employed and insured. Uncertain as to what you are referring to as all political.
     
    • Like Like x 2
  10. gator_lawyer

    gator_lawyer VIP Member

    16,376
    5,614
    3,213
    Oct 30, 2017
    Good.
     
    • Disagree Bacon! Disagree Bacon! x 1
  11. demosthenes

    demosthenes Premium Member

    8,727
    1,054
    3,218
    Apr 3, 2007
    Yeah, I can see why you’d say that; we’ve long ago established you fully engage in “tribal politics.” Move along.
     
    • Funny Funny x 2
  12. G8trGr8t

    G8trGr8t Premium Member

    30,942
    11,927
    3,693
    Aug 26, 2008
    Shouldn't have been forgiven
     
    • Disagree Bacon! Disagree Bacon! x 1
  13. gator_lawyer

    gator_lawyer VIP Member

    16,376
    5,614
    3,213
    Oct 30, 2017
    The point of the PPP loans was to keep businesses alive and people employed. If that money actually made its way to the employees, I consider that a win. Better it helps some folks than the feds waste it on something frivolous, like a ship that doesn't work.
     
    • Agree Agree x 1
    • Winner Winner x 1
  14. Gator715

    Gator715 GC Hall of Fame

    6,848
    835
    2,103
    Dec 6, 2015
    How tribal of you. :D
     
  15. G8trGr8t

    G8trGr8t Premium Member

    30,942
    11,927
    3,693
    Aug 26, 2008
    Two wrongs don't make a right. Hundreds of billions were added to our kids debt that shouldn't have been
     
  16. gator_lawyer

    gator_lawyer VIP Member

    16,376
    5,614
    3,213
    Oct 30, 2017
    I support debt forgiveness, though. And I support efforts to make higher education far more affordable, even free. It's a public good that should make our country economically stronger and more civically engaged.
     
    • Agree Agree x 1
  17. okeechobee

    okeechobee GC Hall of Fame

    8,718
    1,080
    328
    Sep 11, 2022
    This thread is a great example of common sense people validating stupidity by attempting to debate stupidity. The thread should have been locked as soon as someone pointed out to the OP that the PPP loans had a forgiveness clause in their initial contracts.
     
    • Agree Agree x 2
  18. tilly

    tilly Superhero Mod. Fast witted. Bulletproof posts. Moderator VIP Member

    He didnt take it. He paid his employees with it. The government did that to prevent layoffs. PPP money was a completely unique thing and should not be compared to other loans.
     
    • Agree Agree x 1
  19. tilly

    tilly Superhero Mod. Fast witted. Bulletproof posts. Moderator VIP Member

    PPP was based on salaries and *some* lost revenue. You had to go through a process that basically required detailed payroll accounting.

    There wasnt really this truckload of money dumped into a bin in the accounting dept and we just kept most of the pile as profit.

    The money has to be accounted for or the "loan" loses the forgiveness component.

    This is just politics.

    Loan forgiveness for students is good in my eyes.

    But one can disagree with me and still take PPP funds in good faith because they arent even close to the same thing.
     
    • Agree Agree x 1
  20. murphree_hall

    murphree_hall VIP Member

    8,787
    4,416
    2,898
    Jul 11, 2019
    I didn’t even see this hating ass part the first time. Look, it was nice to have, but was it necessary? Did it improve my bottom line? Would I have done it if there were revenue generating things I could have done? No.

    How do you even analyze how cleaning and painting increased your revenue? It was busy work. I was paying them, so I’m not just going to have them sit around and stare at the clock. They didn’t want to, either. They knew I was footing the bill. Also, I did that while I was paying, that was well before the PPP came. I had almost ran out of operating cash when the loan arrived. I might have been able to make one or two more payrolls before closing up the shops. PPP gave us just enough to survive, and then we went on a tear the next year.
     
    • Like Like x 1