Welcome home, fellow Gator.

The Gator Nation's oldest and most active insider community
Join today!
  1. Hi there... Can you please quickly check to make sure your email address is up to date here? Just in case we need to reach out to you or you lose your password. Muchero thanks!

Plane going off runway in S Korea

Discussion in 'Too Hot for Swamp Gas' started by ATLGATORFAN, Dec 29, 2024.

  1. GatorJMDZ

    GatorJMDZ gatorjack VIP Member

    25,578
    2,748
    1,868
    Apr 3, 2007
    Uhmm, that's not how it works.
     
  2. citygator

    citygator VIP Member

    12,145
    2,639
    3,303
    Apr 3, 2007
    Charlotte
    [​IMG]

    [​IMG]
     
    • Informative Informative x 2
    • Agree Agree x 1
  3. 92gator

    92gator GC Hall of Fame

    14,588
    14,468
    3,363
    Jun 14, 2007
    Look, I'm not suggesting driving is safer than flying, I'm saying the stats can be spun to suggest that.

    ...and it is a fact that every time 2 vehicles pass one another with only paint bt them, each vehicle is at the other's mercy, that the other driver will keep his lane. That's 1,000's of potential fatalities avoided by and for each driver--such that is we were to used fatalities avoided as the denominator, the fatalities not avoided, would be infitesimal.

    We take it for granted though, bc cars breaching the painted lines and causing head on collusion is so rare in comparison that it is disregarded as realistic possibility, though that (cars keeping their respective lanes) is literally what happens millions of times a day.
     
    • Like Like x 1
  4. citygator

    citygator VIP Member

    12,145
    2,639
    3,303
    Apr 3, 2007
    Charlotte
    If pilots flew into the ground there would be a lot of fatalities. They avoid killing all their passengers ever single second they are in the air... back to being safer than driving using avoidable fatalities.
     
  5. 92gator

    92gator GC Hall of Fame

    14,588
    14,468
    3,363
    Jun 14, 2007
    That's 1x/ flight--already part of the equation, and faaaaaar < cars aimed at you but missing you by inches (due to that unbreakable barrier known as a painted solid/dotted line) hundreds of times/ day
     
    • Agree Agree x 1
  6. chemgator

    chemgator GC Hall of Fame

    13,987
    1,993
    1,318
    Apr 3, 2007
    Now for the real reason for the disaster: a "localizer antenna" instrument landing system at Muan International Airport is supposed to be installed at the end of the runway, but it is not supposed to be supported by a concrete barrier. It is supposed to be collapsible. The presence of concrete in the design is described as "verging on criminal".

    South Korea plane crash: Placement of runway barrier ‘verging on criminal’

     
    • Informative Informative x 1
  7. Spurffelbow833

    Spurffelbow833 GC Hall of Fame

    9,660
    777
    1,293
    Jan 9, 2009
    Yes, the one in Commerce.
     
  8. OklahomaGator

    OklahomaGator Jedi Administrator Moderator VIP Member

    124,190
    164,261
    116,973
    Apr 3, 2007
    That's about 5 miles from where I live.
     
  9. demosthenes

    demosthenes Premium Member

    8,979
    1,098
    3,218
    Apr 3, 2007
    For the life of me I can’t follow what you’re trying to explain. You mention the invisible barrier between cars and crashes avoided by repeating that barrier, but that is already taken into account in statistics. It’s baked into the numbers.