Welcome home, fellow Gator.

The Gator Nation's oldest and most active insider community
Join today!
  1. Hi there... Can you please quickly check to make sure your email address is up to date here? Just in case we need to reach out to you or you lose your password. Muchero thanks!

Overcharged': Major Study Reveals Alarming True Cost of Owning an EV, 'Fueling' Equal to $17.33 Per

Discussion in 'Too Hot for Swamp Gas' started by flgator2, Oct 29, 2023.

  1. BLING

    BLING GC Hall of Fame

    8,954
    882
    2,843
    Apr 16, 2007
    So basically, you admit everything in the article is likely special interest driven bs, but that’s ok because you don’t like when people point out that you are being lied to?

    Makes sense.
     
    • Winner Winner x 1
  2. Gatoragman

    Gatoragman GC Hall of Fame

    2,574
    243
    288
    Jan 4, 2008
    Doesn't matter what I write you will think what you will and that is your right.
     
  3. slayerxing

    slayerxing GC Hall of Fame

    5,001
    856
    2,078
    Aug 14, 2007
    This is not a study and we should stop calling it a study. It’s an opinion piece that’s been dressed up to convince people it’s a study.
     
    • Agree Agree x 2
  4. mikemcd810

    mikemcd810 Premium Member

    1,957
    436
    348
    Apr 3, 2007
    An echo chamber would be "$17.33 per mile? Makes sense. No further questions."
     
  5. mutz87

    mutz87 p=.06

    38,228
    33,866
    4,211
    Aug 30, 2014
    It's good to be skeptical of all studies, and perhaps even more skeptical of how those studies are presented in the media and then conveyed on social media by others as reflecting this or that. Also true there is always some bias and well, science is steeped in probability--but I think the bigger problem with bias is not in the science itself (though not saying it's not a problem) but in the way others interpret it. In any case, the study cited in the op uses numbers but it's not science and the authors make no effort to even hide their biases.