Welcome home, fellow Gator.

The Gator Nation's oldest and most active insider community
Join today!

No Sign of a Red Wave; Plenty of Signs of a Dobbs Wave

Discussion in 'Too Hot for Swamp Gas' started by gatorchamps960608, Aug 24, 2022.

  1. ridgetop

    ridgetop GC Hall of Fame

    1,918
    675
    1,848
    Aug 4, 2020
    Top of the ridge
    Not control of her body. Who is controlling her body? She can have as much sex as she wants with whoever she wants.. but her partners get the right to say I don’t want the kid. Pro choice just means only the women gets the choice and has control of the man’s money.
     
  2. wgbgator

    wgbgator Premium Member

    29,770
    1,839
    1,968
    Apr 19, 2007
    Not if the supreme court and Republican legislatures has their way!
     
  3. ridgetop

    ridgetop GC Hall of Fame

    1,918
    675
    1,848
    Aug 4, 2020
    Top of the ridge
    Please notice I didn’t specify a gender in that statement. I hold both men and women responsible for having unprotected sex.
     
  4. ridgetop

    ridgetop GC Hall of Fame

    1,918
    675
    1,848
    Aug 4, 2020
    Top of the ridge
    How so? Republicans and the SC are going to magically make it impossible to know how to stop pregnancies? It’s general, wide spread knowledge. Y’all can keep making up dystopian fear mongering rumors but it’s just not true.
     
  5. wgbgator

    wgbgator Premium Member

    29,770
    1,839
    1,968
    Apr 19, 2007
    If you are saying people should be forced to bear consequences by giving birth, that is control of your body. There's no way around that.
     
  6. GatorNorth

    GatorNorth Premium Member Premium Member

    17,126
    8,054
    3,203
    Apr 3, 2007
    Atlanta
    Did I miss the memo where conjecture was no longer permissible on an internet message board whose sole purpose was the exchange of differing opinions? Gonna have to delete 90% of the threads on here if that’s the standard.

    Lemme know when these legislatures disallow the use of Viagra and Cialis because having a limp dick is “god’s will” like getting pregnant is.
     
  7. wgbgator

    wgbgator Premium Member

    29,770
    1,839
    1,968
    Apr 19, 2007
    You dont think the people trying to pass total bans are going to have an interest in regulating or banning birth control? Those nuts think wearing a condom is an abortion.
     
    • Agree Agree x 1
  8. mdgator05

    mdgator05 Premium Member

    15,786
    2,035
    1,718
    Dec 9, 2010
    Child support begins after the child is born because it is for the child, not the mother. Once born, the issue of bodily autonomy is removed. The fact that both parents are responsible for an already born child does not mean that you have ownership over a mother's body in the interim.
     
  9. ridgetop

    ridgetop GC Hall of Fame

    1,918
    675
    1,848
    Aug 4, 2020
    Top of the ridge
    I’m not asking for ownership of the mothers body. If the women gets to decide to have the baby against the man’s wishes, a baby that is half his, then he gets to say nope I don’t want to support it. If she chooses not to have the baby, then the man has no say. The women still gets complete control and complete say over her body and what happens with the baby. The man gets to decide if he wants to support the child or not.
     
  10. ridgetop

    ridgetop GC Hall of Fame

    1,918
    675
    1,848
    Aug 4, 2020
    Top of the ridge
    To be clear you said the republicans and the SC . Are there nut jobs out there yea, but they are a minority as we saw in Kansas.
     
  11. wgbgator

    wgbgator Premium Member

    29,770
    1,839
    1,968
    Apr 19, 2007
    I mean, lots of men do decide not to support their child as it stands
     
  12. ridgetop

    ridgetop GC Hall of Fame

    1,918
    675
    1,848
    Aug 4, 2020
    Top of the ridge
    Ar ewe not allowed to call dumb posts? Ones that are nothing but flamethrower g hyperbole that has no proof or basis?
     
  13. ridgetop

    ridgetop GC Hall of Fame

    1,918
    675
    1,848
    Aug 4, 2020
    Top of the ridge
    Not legally they don’t. And they deal with the consequences of that choice.
     
  14. wgbgator

    wgbgator Premium Member

    29,770
    1,839
    1,968
    Apr 19, 2007
    Yes, when decided democratically people want legal abortion, when decided in non-democratic fashion by state legislatures and unelected courts, it gets banned or restrained, which is why the GOP has taken an anti-democratic turn. Its aims are incompatible with democracy.
     
  15. wgbgator

    wgbgator Premium Member

    29,770
    1,839
    1,968
    Apr 19, 2007
    The consequences are pretty minimal and easy to avoid, you cant really take money or support from people who don't have it and cant give it, and are willing to abdicate all their rights over a child. I think what you are arguing for is that people with the money and means to support a child shouldn't have to, because really that's who your proposal would protect.
     
  16. AgingGator

    AgingGator GC Hall of Fame

    3,694
    794
    2,088
    Apr 24, 2007

    I’ll put my intelligence and career accomplishments up against yours any day. I’ve never worshipped Trump. If you knew my opinion like you think you do you would know that I have often said that I would not want my sister dating him. What I liked were the majority of his policies. What I disliked was the ridiculous way he was vilified by the left and was guilty until proven innocent by you all for any and everything.

    And don’t give me any of your usual democrat bullshit that he’s one of the few/only republicans that you hate. I’ve been around long enough to see your ilk do the same thing to every republican president or presidential candidate going back to Ford.

    According to you all:
    Ford was a klutz.
    Reagan was a dunce.
    Bush was an out of touch elitist.
    Dole was mean.
    George W was a privileged, drug addicted since.
    McCain was your hero until he became a candidate for president. Then he was a hatemonger and racist.
    Romney was an out of touch elitist and god forbid a Mormon.
    Trump was all of the above as well as anything else negative that anyone could come up with.
     
    • Winner Winner x 2
    • Funny Funny x 1
    • Creative Creative x 1
  17. oragator1

    oragator1 Premium Member

    22,872
    5,575
    3,488
    Apr 3, 2007
    Right now if I had to bet, the senate stays about a wash mainly because of the terrible slate of Republican candidates, the republicans pick up a few seats in the house but not nearly as many as they could have (even with Dobbs) had they focused on the economy and other top line items instead of still trying to make their fever dream of a stolen ‘20 election real, along with their almost fetishist attachment to orange Julias.
    The dems finally, after nearly two years, got their act together and focused on those things instead of culture/race/gender war garbage that the vast majority of the country doesn’t care much about… though it might be too little too late.
     
  18. ridgetop

    ridgetop GC Hall of Fame

    1,918
    675
    1,848
    Aug 4, 2020
    Top of the ridge
    Dead beat dads are often put in jail and wages garnished. What you are advocating for is that women get to decide if the baby lives or not, and they get to decide who pays for the baby. The man has zero say in the matter. The idea that men can just ignore their “responsibility” to pay for a child they didn’t want and that makes everything equal is asinine.
    Women can choose not to have a baby if they don’t want it or can’t afford it. Men should have the exact same reproductive rights.
     
  19. wgbgator

    wgbgator Premium Member

    29,770
    1,839
    1,968
    Apr 19, 2007
    They do have the exact same reproductive rights, when a man conceives and gives birth he can choose to exercise them just like a woman. And when a woman knocks up a man, he can sue her for child support. No laws preventing any of that. If there's a double standard, blame biology, not the law. ;)

    There is really no way to implement what you want without giving a man some kind of veto power over a woman's choice. And for the people who dont like abortion, it seems like giving a man the ability to strong arm someone into an abortion by saying they will not financially support the child will create incentives for coercion, ones that will lead to more choices to abort a child, not less.
     
    Last edited: Aug 24, 2022
    • Agree Agree x 1
  20. ridgetop

    ridgetop GC Hall of Fame

    1,918
    675
    1,848
    Aug 4, 2020
    Top of the ridge
    So it’s all about the money. Women have complete control and say over their body, over the child and also want control over the man’s income. At least we don’t have to pretend it’s all “my body my choice” anymore since y’all have made it clear it’s now Your Wallet my choice”.