Welcome home, fellow Gator.

The Gator Nation's oldest and most active insider community
Join today!
  1. Hi there... Can you please quickly check to make sure your email address is up to date here? Just in case we need to reach out to you or you lose your password. Muchero thanks!

Netanyahu tells Israel ‘We are at war’ after Hamas launches an unprecedented attack, killing at leas

Discussion in 'Too Hot for Swamp Gas' started by Gatorrick22, Oct 7, 2023.

  1. wgbgator

    wgbgator Premium Member

    30,267
    1,911
    2,218
    Apr 19, 2007
    A wise man, and pretty much the case for egalitarianism in a nutshell
     
  2. tampagtr

    tampagtr VIP Member

    17,618
    2,864
    1,618
    Apr 3, 2007
    Let's hope he is unwise in regard to traps in the South China Sea
     
    • Like Like x 1
  3. tampagtr

    tampagtr VIP Member

    17,618
    2,864
    1,618
    Apr 3, 2007
    Positive update:

    In Haifa and Jaffa, joint Jewish and Arab patrols seek to prevent violence on both sides. In the south, Bedouin residents risk their lives to search for victims of Hamas terror. In the shadow of war, Arab-Jewish solidarity initiatives emerge

     
    • Like Like x 4
    • Informative Informative x 2
    • Friendly Friendly x 1
  4. uftaipan

    uftaipan GC Hall of Fame

    9,173
    2,146
    1,483
    May 31, 2007
    Fresno, CA
    Attributed to the Athenians in the Melian Dialogue according to Thucydides. An early example of the international theory of Realism actually stated out loud.
     
    • Fistbump/Thanks! Fistbump/Thanks! x 1
  5. tampagtr

    tampagtr VIP Member

    17,618
    2,864
    1,618
    Apr 3, 2007
    I learn something new. Regardless of who, much truth, although, IMO, pure realism should always try to be avoided
     
  6. BLING

    BLING GC Hall of Fame

    8,948
    882
    2,843
    Apr 16, 2007
    I think it’s fair game if they are in an active war-zone or area controlled by warlords. It’s not like you are going to send the FBI to go arrest terrorists in their strongholds. The drone or missile indeed may be the only real option if you get the intel as to where they are. If an American citizen is holed up with some of the “most wanted” terrorists on foreign soil, they don’t get any special consideration in the theater of war.

    I thought Trumps assassination of the Iranian general crossed a different line because it took place at a civilian airport. In an area pretty well under Iraqi govt control. Obviously it was a bad dude we killed. So my feelings weren’t strongly against. But its legality and wisdom was… I guess sketchy is the word.
     
  7. uftaipan

    uftaipan GC Hall of Fame

    9,173
    2,146
    1,483
    May 31, 2007
    Fresno, CA
    My answer to that is, it depends. Realism and liberal internationalism have different rules, and you can’t play one by the other’s rules. You have to play by the rules of the game you’re in, or you’ll lose. If you win, you can change the game. Unfortunately, Russia, China, and Iran have set the game.
     
    • Agree Agree x 2
  8. tampagtr

    tampagtr VIP Member

    17,618
    2,864
    1,618
    Apr 3, 2007
    Putting aside the legality, I really thought we would have experienced blow back already on that, but it hasn't happened yet. Of course, the Iranians work on their own time frame, we may have thwarted attempts. But I remain pleasantly surprised
     
    Last edited: Oct 12, 2023
  9. okeechobee

    okeechobee GC Hall of Fame

    10,837
    1,420
    678
    Sep 11, 2022
    If what Trump said is true about Netanyahu, not wanting a part of the Soleimani assassination, but taking credit for it afterwards, that explains a great deal.
     
    • Agree Agree x 1
  10. GatorBen

    GatorBen Premium Member

    6,385
    1,072
    2,968
    Apr 9, 2007
    What makes the line blurry is that for those kinds of killings, oftentimes the closer question is whether it violates the US ban on “assassinations” rather than “international law.”

    What the international law of war discusses are killings through “treachery” or “perfidy” (essentially killing someone through trickery or putting a bounty on their head), which probably doesn’t cover that kind of strike. To the extent the target is in a non-combatant nation you get the additional argument of whether it’s within the “self-defense” right under the UN Charter, but that’s a circumstance-specific question and not one that applies to targeted killings generally.

    And with respect to the US ban, even if it did apply, it derives from an executive order that the president could just modify or withdraw if he wanted to.
     
    • Like Like x 1
  11. GatorBen

    GatorBen Premium Member

    6,385
    1,072
    2,968
    Apr 9, 2007
    This, like most things starting with that qualifier, can likely be easily answered with “it probably isn’t.”
     
    • Funny Funny x 3
    • Winner Winner x 2
  12. BLING

    BLING GC Hall of Fame

    8,948
    882
    2,843
    Apr 16, 2007
    The man is a sociopathic liar, so that’s a helluva “if”.
     
    • Agree Agree x 3
    • Like Like x 1
  13. okeechobee

    okeechobee GC Hall of Fame

    10,837
    1,420
    678
    Sep 11, 2022
    And listen to the Biden clowns attempt to play us for fools, seizing upon Trump saying Hezbollah is “very smart”, while demanding Biden to refreeze the $6 billion in Iranian assets. I would say Hamas and Hezbollah are indeed very smart to be able to pull off an attack like this, without Israel having a faint knowledge of its origin. Why would we ever return any funds to Iran?
     
    • Winner Winner x 2
  14. okeechobee

    okeechobee GC Hall of Fame

    10,837
    1,420
    678
    Sep 11, 2022
    perhaps poorly worded by myself, but you have no proof or evidence that his words aren’t true. In fact, they make perfect sense, because otherwise Netanyahu would have taken out Soleimani long before Trump ever did.
     
  15. VAg8r1

    VAg8r1 GC Hall of Fame

    21,466
    1,794
    1,763
    Apr 8, 2007
    For a little context that American citizen actively recruited terrorists for al Qaeda including the following:
     
  16. GatorBen

    GatorBen Premium Member

    6,385
    1,072
    2,968
    Apr 9, 2007
    I’ll quibble slightly that the fact Trump said them is at least some evidence that they’re not true, the question is just how powerful that evidence is in this particular circumstance.
     
    • Agree Agree x 1
  17. okeechobee

    okeechobee GC Hall of Fame

    10,837
    1,420
    678
    Sep 11, 2022
    Do you still think Bibi let the attack happen, lol?
     
  18. wgbgator

    wgbgator Premium Member

    30,267
    1,911
    2,218
    Apr 19, 2007
    Especially when you find out what happened to the people of Melos
     
  19. okeechobee

    okeechobee GC Hall of Fame

    10,837
    1,420
    678
    Sep 11, 2022
    Stop cucking for the Dems. There will be more and more information about Netanyahu and his intelligence failures regarding this over the next few weeks. I suspect most of, if not all of Trump’s words will be validated.
     
  20. tampagtr

    tampagtr VIP Member

    17,618
    2,864
    1,618
    Apr 3, 2007
    I feel like I need to look that up now