Welcome home, fellow Gator.

The Gator Nation's oldest and most active insider community
Join today!
  1. Hi there... Can you please quickly check to make sure your email address is up to date here? Just in case we need to reach out to you or you lose your password. Muchero thanks!

Nearly 100 Percent of Political Contributions From Fact Checkers Go to Democrats

Discussion in 'Too Hot for Swamp Gas' started by Contra, Dec 27, 2024.

  1. vaxcardinal

    vaxcardinal GC Hall of Fame

    7,742
    1,139
    2,043
    Apr 8, 2007
    Which vice president elect are you referring to here and which vice president elect are you ignoring ?
     
    • Winner Winner x 1
  2. PITBOSS

    PITBOSS GC Hall of Fame

    7,947
    831
    558
    Apr 13, 2007
    I claimed I wouldn’t blindly follow that site. I gave an exacting example where a right wing news org was wrong for the sake on confirmation bias. I also provided a link the op site is questionable. Again, I never once claimed the data was wrong and to make that point I specifically stated I wasn’t familiar with the data.

    However, what’s interesting in every one of your replies you have to go to personal attacks. This is pretty common among folks” who get triggered easily and emotional with anyone with a different opinion.
     
    Last edited: Dec 30, 2024 at 7:48 PM
  3. CaptUSMCNole

    CaptUSMCNole Premium Member

    3,473
    236
    393
    May 23, 2007
    NCR
    It’s not a personal attack. I’m pointing out that people on the left do not bother learning about the tribes on the right because they do not think they have to or it is worth their time. They tend to lump everyone on the Right into MAGA, even when they are not. Some people on the right take that as an insult and point out they are not MAGA. That is what I did when I pointed out the editor in chief was Eliana Johnson, who is definitely not MAGA.