Welcome home, fellow Gator.

The Gator Nation's oldest and most active insider community
Join today!

Musk buys a big chunk of Twitter

Discussion in 'Too Hot for Swamp Gas' started by rivergator, Apr 4, 2022.

  1. 96Gatorcise

    96Gatorcise GC Hall of Fame

    15,713
    26,015
    3,363
    Aug 6, 2008
    Tampa
    Being a racist or sexist isn't illegal, posting someone's address without their knowledge is illegal.
     
  2. rivergator

    rivergator Too Hot Mod Moderator VIP Member

    35,349
    1,741
    2,258
    Apr 8, 2007
    You sure about that?
     
  3. 96Gatorcise

    96Gatorcise GC Hall of Fame

    15,713
    26,015
    3,363
    Aug 6, 2008
    Tampa
    Obviously it depends on the context. Applying your racism/sexism from a position of authority is illegal. Posting on a social media platform shouldn't be.
     
  4. Spurffelbow833

    Spurffelbow833 GC Hall of Fame

    9,501
    714
    1,293
    Jan 9, 2009
    How about "Elon Musk's Too Hot for Swamp Gas"? I like the sound of that.
     
    • Funny Funny x 3
  5. GatorNorth

    GatorNorth Premium Member Premium Member

    17,132
    8,055
    3,203
    Apr 3, 2007
    Atlanta
    No, but it will earn you a hell of a slap by an overprotective spouse witnessed by tens of millions of people.
     
    • Funny Funny x 6
  6. GatorNorth

    GatorNorth Premium Member Premium Member

    17,132
    8,055
    3,203
    Apr 3, 2007
    Atlanta
    There are plenty of places to find someone's address on the internet, starting with your county tax assessor's records if you own your home. It's bad form, but I don't necessarily think its illegal per se, is it?
     
    • Agree Agree x 1
  7. rivergator

    rivergator Too Hot Mod Moderator VIP Member

    35,349
    1,741
    2,258
    Apr 8, 2007
  8. gatorchamps960608

    gatorchamps960608 GC Hall of Fame

    4,507
    939
    2,463
    Jul 4, 2020
    Someone was scared of the background check. Interesting.
     
    • Funny Funny x 1
    • Come On Man Come On Man x 1
  9. 96Gatorcise

    96Gatorcise GC Hall of Fame

    15,713
    26,015
    3,363
    Aug 6, 2008
    Tampa
    I wouldn't be surprised if the reason he turned it down was because he is planning on buying more shares greater then the 14.9% he would have been limited to by being on the board.
     
    • Agree Agree x 3
    • Winner Winner x 1
    • Informative Informative x 1
  10. PerSeGator

    PerSeGator GC Hall of Fame

    2,289
    366
    1,993
    Jun 14, 2014
    I wouldn't be surprised if Twitter adopts a poison pill to prevent that sort of thing (if it doesn't have one already). Particularly since Musk bought his existing stake in secret off the public exchanges, effectively giving him a huge discount.

    If Musk wants control of the company, my guess is the existing board is going to demand a pretty steep premium, and won't just let him buy shares until he reaches 51%.

    Could be that Musk realized that he was being boxed out and threw in the towel. Who knows.
     
    • Informative Informative x 1
  11. g8rjd

    g8rjd GC Hall of Fame

    7,743
    648
    1,193
    Jan 20, 2008
    Tallahassee, FL
    When someone explains that owing a fiduciary duty to a company means you can’t engage in a hostile takeover of it, it probably put a real wet blanket on his day.

    The last paragraph of the statement is really telling.



    “There will be distractions ahead, but our goals and priorities remain unchanged. The decisions we make and how we execute is in our hands, no one else's. Let's tune out the noise, and stay focused on the work and what we're doing.”

    As @PerSeGator noted, the poison pills are coming.
     
    • Agree Agree x 1
    • Informative Informative x 1
  12. gatorpa

    gatorpa GC Hall of Fame

    11,369
    1,017
    698
    Sep 5, 2010
    East Coast of FL
    As is hate speech
     
    • Agree Agree x 2
  13. slightlyskeptic

    slightlyskeptic All American

    300
    114
    1,733
    May 13, 2021
    Yeah, he learned his lesson as a company officer/board member about saying exactly what he wants at Tesla. I’m sure they offered the board seat to try and shut him up or at least keep him from saying things about Twitter publicly. He likes using polls to take the pulse of Twitter users. Can’t do that as a board member. The current CEO is an arrogant doosh who wants to determine what people see and wants to influence how they think. This is going to continue to be fun to watch.
     
  14. GatorNorth

    GatorNorth Premium Member Premium Member

    17,132
    8,055
    3,203
    Apr 3, 2007
    Atlanta
    Twitter offers Musk a board seat and he immediately begins tweeting criticisms of the company. So they revoke the offer.

    Pass the popcorn. This will be fun to watch.
     
  15. oragator1

    oragator1 Premium Member

    22,881
    5,578
    3,488
    Apr 3, 2007
    Yeah, I doubt it’s the background
    Check (though you never know), and more the belief that he can be a bigger disruptor from the outside than the inside. He can say what he wants when he wants, buy more shares, and even dump them and crash the stock to make his point if he wants to.
     
  16. g8rjd

    g8rjd GC Hall of Fame

    7,743
    648
    1,193
    Jan 20, 2008
    Tallahassee, FL
    I mean, he posted this when he was literally being handed a board seat.



    Trying to depress the stock price of a company you owe a fiduciary duty to? Yeah, not so smart.

    (Also, stupid post because most followers doesn’t mean most engagement.)
     
  17. g8trjax

    g8trjax GC Hall of Fame

    5,164
    438
    293
    Jun 1, 2007
    'Billionaire Elon Musk’s reversal of his decision to join Twitter’s board opens the door to a hostile takeover and could lead to additional volatility in the stock, according to analysts'. :emoji_joy:
     
  18. rivergator

    rivergator Too Hot Mod Moderator VIP Member

    35,349
    1,741
    2,258
    Apr 8, 2007
  19. g8rjd

    g8rjd GC Hall of Fame

    7,743
    648
    1,193
    Jan 20, 2008
    Tallahassee, FL