Welcome home, fellow Gator.

The Gator Nation's oldest and most active insider community
Join today!

Meet the Pensacola English teacher waging war on books

Discussion in 'Too Hot for Swamp Gas' started by gator_lawyer, Dec 27, 2022.

  1. Gator715

    Gator715 GC Hall of Fame

    6,909
    846
    2,103
    Dec 6, 2015
    State and local governments, school boards, etc. Representatives of "the people." For a long time, the way things have been done in this country, those who whine or make a fuss get accommodated and those who mind their own business get neglected. It's time conservative parents started making some noise.

    No, I think it's the role of elementary schools to teach basic truths and subjects to children, not inculcate values, whether secular or religious.
     
  2. l_boy

    l_boy 5500

    12,913
    1,727
    3,268
    Jan 6, 2009
    So only hetero marriage is a “truth”? Banning mention of gay marriage is not “inculcating values”? You are posting contradictions in the same post.

    You are all over the map here. Just making it up as you go. Zero logic to any of it.
     
    • Agree Agree x 1
    • Winner Winner x 1
  3. Gator715

    Gator715 GC Hall of Fame

    6,909
    846
    2,103
    Dec 6, 2015
    Who opposes heterosexual marriage?

    Presenting gay relationships as normal to children is inculcating values on children. I've already discussed this at length, just read the thread.
     
  4. l_boy

    l_boy 5500

    12,913
    1,727
    3,268
    Jan 6, 2009
    So we can only expose children to concepts that 100% of the population is ok with. You say we shouldn’t inculcate religious values but then suggest criteria defining normalcy based on primarily religious values.
     
    • Winner Winner x 1
  5. Gator715

    Gator715 GC Hall of Fame

    6,909
    846
    2,103
    Dec 6, 2015
    You seem to make a habit of imputing arguments on me that I never made in bad faith.

    We can talk circles like that all day, but I have better things to do with my time.
     
  6. tilly

    tilly Superhero Mod. Fast witted. Bulletproof posts. Moderator VIP Member

    No question and we agree. (Im not one for just censoring reality out of the public sphere).

    But it was stated in this thread that admin should decide what books are in public libraries with no say from parents presumably.

    I am trying to say that certain content should be up for discussion with PARENTS and should not even be there to stumble across if the parents (majority perhaps) have serious concerns.

    I agree the content of these books isn't really stated, but the one quote in the article seems pretty explicit and out of bounds for 5th grade.
     
  7. tilly

    tilly Superhero Mod. Fast witted. Bulletproof posts. Moderator VIP Member

    Yeah. Thats a dumb position for the parent.

    If I want some books removed but am unwilling to do some work than I have no reason to complain.

    I agree
     
    • Fistbump/Thanks! Fistbump/Thanks! x 1
  8. gator_lawyer

    gator_lawyer VIP Member

    17,012
    5,826
    3,213
    Oct 30, 2017
    The same is true of presenting interracial relationships as normal and heterosexual relationships as normal. You have no issue with that because you don't respect the people who would argue otherwise. Basically, you think it's acceptable to discriminate against same-sex couples. That's not a valid reason to remove a book.

    But I'll state again that the school isn't doing any of that simply by virtue of having a book in the library. It's not presenting any relationship as normal. It's simply allowing children to explore the world they live in and come to their own conclusions. Parents who don't want that can restrict or remove their child's access to the school library. Parents who do want that can allow their children the freedom to do it. I'm pro-freedom. How about you?
     
  9. Gator715

    Gator715 GC Hall of Fame

    6,909
    846
    2,103
    Dec 6, 2015
    This very point is why you refuse to tell me where exactly you draw the line as far which books should be removed. As long as you don't answer that question, I'm not addressing this point because you favor the exact same thing I do, you just draw the line in different places. I've already said if it's discriminatory, remove books depicting heterosexual couples as well from children's libraries.

    I am not in favor of children exploring the world in some absolute vacuum without guidance, which is apparently what you want a children's library to be.

    I favor your apparent standard for adults and "the real world." I don't favor your standard for malleable and easily influenced children.
     
  10. gator_lawyer

    gator_lawyer VIP Member

    17,012
    5,826
    3,213
    Oct 30, 2017
    Or just leave them all because it's not a big deal. But sure, remove a bunch of books because a small minority of extremist parents might get upset, despite the fact that they have the power to stop their kid from reading the book. That's just not enough. They must have the power to stop every parents' kid from reading the book.

    I told you where I draw the line. You didn't like the answer. That's your problem, not mine.

    That's what a library is. I remember my days as a child looking in the library for a book that interested me. I wasn't being guided by the hand by a librarian.
     
  11. Gator715

    Gator715 GC Hall of Fame

    6,909
    846
    2,103
    Dec 6, 2015
    Parents want a more lenient standard? Go to a public library for adults and check out a book for your kid.

    [​IMG]

    No, but you didn't have access to ALL sorts of books as a child. And children shouldn't have access to ALL sorts of books, some things aren't age appropriate. It's the same reason you probably shouldn't have your 5-7 year old watching cable news. There's no profanity or pornography there, per se, it's just not age appropriate.
     
  12. gator_lawyer

    gator_lawyer VIP Member

    17,012
    5,826
    3,213
    Oct 30, 2017
    In other words, make it more difficult for 90% of the parents because the 10% of crazies aren't content only limiting their children's education. Pass.

    And here comes the strawman argument.
     
  13. Gator715

    Gator715 GC Hall of Fame

    6,909
    846
    2,103
    Dec 6, 2015
    OPINION: Most Americans don’t believe young kids should read or learn LGBTQ themes

    "In a recent national survey I co-direct, we found that fewer than half of Americans support elementary school children even having access in schools to books about most LGBT issues, let alone being assigned to read them."

    The link goes to a Washington Post article behind a paywall.

    Yeah, it's a Hell of a lot closer to 50% than 10%. According to the survey, a MAJORITY oppose ACCESS to books for children regarding most LGBTQ issues. Maybe you're the crazy one here.

    I'm not imputing an argument on you that you never made, I'm clarifying and providing context to what children's libraries offer and the situation regarding removing books from children's libraries using a comparison to cable news as an example.
     
  14. gator_lawyer

    gator_lawyer VIP Member

    17,012
    5,826
    3,213
    Oct 30, 2017
    You're right that it's closer to 50%. Here's what the actual survey says:
    "Though controversy over books containing depictions of families with same-sex parents has received media attention, respondents narrowly approved (53% support) elementary students having access to them; for high school students, support for access reached 73%. The difference between this item and 'experiences of lesbian or gay people' may imply that Americans are more opposed to elementary students having access to books about LGBTQ people than books merely addressing LGBTQ-related topics."

    In any case, doesn't affect my stance at all. Those who care enough and don't want their children having access can restrict or eliminate it. Discrimination is not a valid reason for banning books.

    Nobody ever disputed that schools can remove books that aren't age appropriate.
     
    • Like Like x 1
  15. swampbabe

    swampbabe GC Hall of Fame

    3,690
    928
    2,643
    Apr 8, 2007
    Viera, FL
    Who said that no parents should involved in the vetting process? Not me.

    I’m leery of one quote that may have been taken out of context. Hard to tell when there is no mention of the specific books. Could be a legit complaint/concern or more Moms for Liberty nonsense.
     
    • Agree Agree x 1
  16. Gator715

    Gator715 GC Hall of Fame

    6,909
    846
    2,103
    Dec 6, 2015
    So in a nutshell, you've made the following arguments:
    1. Banning LGBTQ books but not heterosexual books are discriminatory.
    A: Okay, in that case, ban both.
    2. It's bad policy because you're making life more difficult for 90% of Americans.
    A: Actually it's closer to 50/50 for elementary schools, which suggest it's not a fringe issue, it's a mainstream genuine policy issue.
    3. It's not about removing non-age appropriate books, it's about suppressing ideas.
    A: Well, actually it's almost a sliding scale as to what students should have access to these books based on age based on the poll we just discussed. It turns out I'm not alone in thinking as students get older, the more of these kinds of books they should have access to. I'd say that they should for the most part have access to all of them at the high school level.

    Did I leave any arguments out?
     
    • Winner Winner x 1
  17. danmanne65

    danmanne65 GC Hall of Fame

    3,905
    816
    268
    Jul 2, 2022
    DeLand
    Glamorizing was not my term. In the Berenstein bears, there was a mama and a papa bear. I don’t remember anything remotely sexual in their relationship. If they had a friend whose two moms gave a group of kids milk and cookies at their kitchen table. There is no sex there is no glorification. There are just parents doing parent things. This is the type of thing I don’t think should be banned.
     
    • Agree Agree x 1
    • Winner Winner x 1
  18. tampajack1

    tampajack1 Premium Member

    9,571
    1,615
    2,653
    Apr 3, 2007
    Any kid with a smartphone, tablet or laptop can type in the word “porn” and he will enter a world of unlimited pornography, I think. I have never tried it myself. Thank God, however, the kid won’t find the penguin book.
     
    • Winner Winner x 2
  19. danmanne65

    danmanne65 GC Hall of Fame

    3,905
    816
    268
    Jul 2, 2022
    DeLand
    I inhaled books as a child. I would read hundreds if not thousands of books every year. The public library was full of books. I read shelves and shelves of books when something interested me. My dad read mens fiction. I am talking about stuff by Ian Fleming and poorer quality books in the same genre. I don’t think reading adult books when I was 8 or 9 impacted my development one way or another.
     
    • Agree Agree x 1
  20. gator_lawyer

    gator_lawyer VIP Member

    17,012
    5,826
    3,213
    Oct 30, 2017
    And my response is to ban neither. It's ridiculous to think banning a ton of books is better than putting the burden on the small minority of parents who actually care to restrict or eliminate their child's access to the school library.

    And yet, I don't believe most people care enough about the issue to actually involve themselves. Hence, why you have the crazy lady doing all of this is stuff in the OP instead of a large group of parents. So I expect the percentage of parents who actually care enough to make a stink is far smaller than 50% or 40%.

    There is nobody disputing that some books aren't appropriate for elementary school children. Your argument is that any book that features a same-sex couple is inappropriate. And that's not about age appropriateness. It's about discrimination and the suppression of ideas.
     
    • Like Like x 1
    • Best Post Ever Best Post Ever x 1