Welcome home, fellow Gator.

The Gator Nation's oldest and most active insider community
Join today!

MBB OGT: #6 FLORIDA at #10 Kentucky -- January 4, 2025 -- 11 AM [ESPN]

Discussion in 'Nuttin but Net' started by ETGator, Jan 4, 2025 at 8:25 AM.

  1. GatorPlanet

    GatorPlanet GC Hall of Fame

    9,714
    2,325
    1,088
    Apr 15, 2007
    Maitland, FL
    Mark Pope runs perhaps the most creative and innovative offense in college basketball. They had some plays today that were freakin' brilliant in the Xs and Os.
     
    • Agree Agree x 3
    • Like Like x 1
  2. 62gator

    62gator GC Hall of Fame

    11,518
    4,340
    3,303
    Dec 4, 2007
    Tampa, FL
    Arkansas-Tennessee followed our game on the same alphabet network, fwiw. Yes, I believe those 2 games should’ve been flipped.
     
  3. rserina

    rserina GC Hall of Fame

    25,484
    1,183
    1,558
    Apr 3, 2007
    Ringwood, NJ
    I'm not sure I would go "brilliant," but it is pretty difficult stuff to defend with all the off-ball screens and movement. We literally switched EVERYTHING and that will lead to some miscommunication and lapses in help defense. Take that baseline inbounds play where Butler hit the three: Chinyelu is protecting the paint (probably should have been on the inbounder given the size difference), then clearly did not realize he had the inbounder. That's an assignment he would seldom have ordinarily. And then on the Carr three, Martin is worried about the guard shooting, so he stays on Butler (I think it was Butler), while Condon hedges, then recovers too late. Hard to know what the call was there, but I suspect Martin missed the assignment because he was worried about a late shot clock jumper. If we are going to stay aggressive defensively, you have to live with those mistakes. Same thing with those backdoor cuts--you are going to get stuck with some guys trying to switch back out or help.

    What bothered me more was our inability to disrupt passing lanes or create any pressure on the ball. That's where we usually turn it on. We only forced 6 turnovers with 4 points off turnovers, because so few were live balls (3 steals). We only committed 9 turnovers, but that led to 20 points for them, with 6 steals--and that's an area where they have not been exceptional. If we are going to be aggressive switching and scraping defensively, we absolutely have to create more disruption, and our inability to do that today may have been the difference.

    That said, UK is an exceptional offense, and Auburn and Bama may be the only teams we face this year on par with them. I would expect very similar outcomes in those games, frankly. But that should surprise no one. The realty is that this isn't a top 10 defense, and Golden has said so all along. He keeps underscoring that we need a top 40 to 50 defense to go with a legitimate top 10 offense. And absolutely nothing we saw on the court today dispels that offensive ranking: we actually gained a spot in KenPom despite the loss, and I can't imagine any other team puts up 100 in Rupp this year. UK is going to be very hard to beat at home with that offense, and we were some missed free throws and two missed late shot clock threes away from doing that today.
     
    • Like Like x 1
    • Fistbump/Thanks! Fistbump/Thanks! x 1
    • Winner Winner x 1
  4. rserina

    rserina GC Hall of Fame

    25,484
    1,183
    1,558
    Apr 3, 2007
    Ringwood, NJ
    May have felt like it, but it wasn't. It was against vastly better offense in a vastly tougher venue. We contested the rim immensely better, and did so without fouling (we were -11 in FTs then, but +5 today). We were also outrebounded (-1 then, but +8 today). Colorado lived in the paint because we could not stop dribble penetration, but only took 10 shots from the arc. Kentucky put up 29 (nearly half of their shots), many of which were contested or simply open because we got lost on switch. This was a better performance against a better team and a tougher floor, IMO.
     
    • Agree Agree x 2
    • Like Like x 1
    • Fistbump/Thanks! Fistbump/Thanks! x 1
  5. rserina

    rserina GC Hall of Fame

    25,484
    1,183
    1,558
    Apr 3, 2007
    Ringwood, NJ
    Wait, I thought that's what we said last year when we just ran drop coverage? Now that we are switching (on ball and off) and hedging, we are an easy scout?
     
  6. rserina

    rserina GC Hall of Fame

    25,484
    1,183
    1,558
    Apr 3, 2007
    Ringwood, NJ
    I expected he would struggle to start. That doesn't mean he is "not an SEC caliber big." The kid was late bloomer who weighed like 180 as a HS senior. He has basically played the post for about three seasons (one at Apopka, two at Chattanooga, where he had 13-6-3 at Auburn last year). Coming into conference play, I thought he would struggle at first with the speed and physicality of this league, but I see no reason he can't come around. He has good size, length, and strength, and he was a dominant rebounder and shotblocker at a lower level. He just needs time--which is fine, because Condon, Haugh, and Chinyelu means we don't need him to play more than 10-15 minutes a game at this stage.
     
    • Optimistic Optimistic x 1
  7. MadduxFanII

    MadduxFanII GC Hall of Fame

    5,257
    381
    368
    Apr 10, 2007
    The decisive stretch seemed to come when we had cut the lead to two at the under-four timeout, then forced Kentucky to take the ball out bounds at kind of an awkward spot on the floor with about three seconds left on the shot clock. Then Butler hit that way-too-easy three off the out-of-bounds play to stretch the lead to five, we missed a three on the other end, then Butler hit two free throws to extend the lead to seven. Kept fighting, but -- after quickly checking the play-by-play -- I don't think we were able to make it a one-possession game after that point.
     
    • Like Like x 1
    • Agree Agree x 1
  8. bullish

    bullish GC Hall of Fame

    3,086
    1,110
    1,853
    Nov 14, 2010
    I was thinking having Condo come of the bench. He was getting pushed aside due to not weighing enough and Kentucky’s bigs having their way with him. He hesitates under the board to make a move to score and he doesn’t feel comfortable shooting the three. Easy to get three pointers off him. With no real inside scoring basketball front court player, everybody will just foul our bigs and get rebounds off missed ft’s.
     
    Last edited: Jan 5, 2025 at 1:09 PM
    • Funny Funny x 1
  9. rserina

    rserina GC Hall of Fame

    25,484
    1,183
    1,558
    Apr 3, 2007
    Ringwood, NJ
    Haugh played more minutes than Chinyelu. What does it matter who starts? And it’s not like our starting unit is struggling. It was ranked the second best in the country during the non-conference slate, IIRC.

    The problem with Haugh is that he can’t play the 5. His rebounding and block rates are all lower than the other three bigs, and he is much smaller than them. Condon isn’t finishing well right now (like last year), but suggesting that he is getting bullied is a strange take.
     
    • Agree Agree x 1
  10. SJB612

    SJB612 GC Hall of Fame

    5,835
    1,410
    2,088
    Apr 12, 2007
    Well, one thing we did learn today is that Chinny is an SEC caliber player.
     
    • Agree Agree x 3
    • Like Like x 2
    • Winner Winner x 1
  11. bullish

    bullish GC Hall of Fame

    3,086
    1,110
    1,853
    Nov 14, 2010
     
  12. akaGatorhoops

    akaGatorhoops GC Columnist VIP Member

    14,496
    2,636
    3,348
    Apr 10, 2007
    Yes, we had a pretty one-dimensional defensive approach last season.
    It’s not the way are defending that makes us an easy scout, but that it’s the only way.
    Did you see a lot of defensive adjustments or alterations today?
    More broadly- I think you need to have, within your defensive arsenal, the ability and willingness to change style… whether it’s pressure, zone, firing the post.. something different, even if to disrupt rhythm and game flow.
     
    Last edited: Jan 4, 2025 at 8:11 PM
    • Agree Agree x 3
    • Winner Winner x 1
  13. dailydoublecat

    dailydoublecat Respected Rival

    9,143
    332
    293
    Apr 8, 2007
    Ocala, FL
    Great basketball game played at a high level. I just watched it. I was hoping UF would win and I loved seeing DeSantis at the game!!

    I do hate that we don’t play down here. You guys are going to have a great season.
     
    • Fistbump/Thanks! Fistbump/Thanks! x 1
    • Friendly Friendly x 1
  14. thenazz

    thenazz All American

    328
    169
    1,753
    Sep 4, 2017
    Albuquerque
    This. Our old friend, missed routine free throws. And the turnover scoring. Props to Ky, they were good.
     
    • Like Like x 1
    • Fistbump/Thanks! Fistbump/Thanks! x 1
  15. akaGatorhoops

    akaGatorhoops GC Columnist VIP Member

    14,496
    2,636
    3,348
    Apr 10, 2007
    you were hoping Florida would win? Why??
     
    Last edited: Jan 4, 2025 at 8:48 PM
    • Agree Agree x 1
  16. Singaporegator

    Singaporegator GC Hall of Fame

    I didn’t read everything on the thread so it may have been discused but it seems pretty straightforward. Kentucky was 18 of 24 from the FT line. We were 22 of 35. That was the difference. UK left 6 points at the line, we left 13.
     
    • Like Like x 1
  17. audiogatorjim

    audiogatorjim GC Hall of Fame

    1,861
    859
    1,848
    Mar 15, 2009
    10 am for me in CST. Almost had to set the alarm.
     
    • Funny Funny x 3
  18. audiogatorjim

    audiogatorjim GC Hall of Fame

    1,861
    859
    1,848
    Mar 15, 2009
    Yes and the 16 point run they had turned the game 180 degrees.
     
  19. jeffphillips21

    jeffphillips21 GC Hall of Fame

    4,839
    1,350
    2,108
    Jun 20, 2009
    Vancouver
    he's a Power Forward. Tyrese Samuel would have been good to have in this game though.
    We don't have anyone 6'6 to 6'8 on this roster
     
    • Agree Agree x 1
  20. jeffphillips21

    jeffphillips21 GC Hall of Fame

    4,839
    1,350
    2,108
    Jun 20, 2009
    Vancouver
    Agree, this was the biggest surprise
     
    • Agree Agree x 1