Welcome home, fellow Gator.

The Gator Nation's oldest and most active insider community
Join today!
  1. Hi there... Can you please quickly check to make sure your email address is up to date here? Just in case we need to reach out to you or you lose your password. Muchero thanks!

Lock him up! CNN reports Trump to be indicted

Discussion in 'Too Hot for Swamp Gas' started by WarDamnGator, Jun 8, 2023.

  1. l_boy

    l_boy 5500

    13,021
    1,742
    3,268
    Jan 6, 2009
    So a key takeaway here from some posters is that since Hillary and Biden were not charged with a crime, Trump is immune from criminal prosecution, regardless of the nature and severity of the alleged crimes.

    I guess there is an equal time rule equivalent involving criminal Justice of politicians. In order for a Republican to have been charged with a crime, a democrat must have previously been charged with a crime.
     
    • Winner Winner x 3
    • Like Like x 2
  2. G8trGr8t

    G8trGr8t Premium Member

    32,459
    12,163
    3,693
    Aug 26, 2008
    How many hjudges in that district that would have been on the wheel?

    What are the odds that she ends up with both of these cases if the draw was truly random?

    Any chance that he fired his attorneys as a stall move just to help delay the proceedings?

    Can he just keep firing attorneys and delay trial indefinitely?
     
  3. GatorNorth

    GatorNorth Premium Member Premium Member

    17,386
    8,136
    3,203
    Apr 3, 2007
    Atlanta
    I never said it was ok but you specifically referenced the Presidential Records Act in the post I was responding to.

    That aside, did Bill Barr not investigate Hilary and clear her of numerous of the “crimes” people were chanting “lock her up” for? Some left wing shill he turned out to be, huh? Although I’ve consistently said if she committed crimes, she should face charges, no different than I’ve said about Trump.

    And isn’t the investigation into Biden’s documents still ongoing? So let’s see how that may or may not distinguish itself from Trump showing docs to any idiot who will listen, and lying about their existence in the first place.

    Meanwhile I notice that not one rightie on here who is calling Trump’s knowingly flaunting classified invasion plans, enemy defense plans and nuclear secrets a partisan witch hunt, or whatever silly moniker de jour that Trump has brain washed y’all into has even bothered to reference that Pence has already been cleared for “doing the same thing Trump did” (which is hardly legally accurate at all), but I understand that dealing in nuance and differing criminal elements is lost upon our resident Trumpies.
     
    Last edited: Jun 9, 2023
    • Like Like x 1
    • Agree Agree x 1
    • Winner Winner x 1
  4. BLING

    BLING GC Hall of Fame

    8,948
    882
    2,843
    Apr 16, 2007
    That’s not actually true though, unless you can cite the statute and penalty (as of 2009). Also noting that both Condoleeza Rice and Colin Powell both said they had the same sort of email arrangement.

    As I recall, Obama actually had an executive order demanding use of government servers, so Clinton violated Obama’s executive policies. But that isn’t criminal.

    Maybe it’s since been codified into law since that “scandal”? I don’t know. But in the relative time period it wasn’t. It was more just a thing that was highly encouraged or could get someone fired. What WAS required by law was to turn over the govt related emails, which Clinton and her lawyers did. Know who didn’t!? Donald Trump. He actually did the opposite, he stole government records. Highly classified records. Then did several criminal actions to maintain that theft.
     
  5. GatorJMDZ

    GatorJMDZ gatorjack VIP Member

    25,373
    2,700
    1,868
    Apr 3, 2007
    Research mens rea so you don't look quite as silly.
     
    • Optimistic Optimistic x 2
  6. tampagtr

    tampagtr VIP Member

    17,612
    2,861
    1,618
    Apr 3, 2007
     
    • Funny Funny x 2
  7. AzCatFan

    AzCatFan GC Hall of Fame

    12,217
    1,159
    1,618
    Apr 9, 2007
    The DOJ has prosecutorial discretion. And a history of not prosecuting former high b ranking officials who has classified docs when that person cooperates. Hillary by setting up her own email server was doing exactly what several W. appointees did, including Colin Powell. It wasn't until later in Obama's administration did Obama change the rules. And it wasn't a law, but administration change only.

    Hillary also deleted the emails before the investigation. She wasn't required to keep any that weren't related to her position as Secretary of State. Those emails were all forwarded onto an official server and recorded, per the law.

    Someone stealing a candy bar accidently from a grocery store because they forgot to ring it up at self checkout is breaking the law. But stores aren't going to push for prosecution, especially if caught, the person goes back and pays for the candy. But a person committing armed robbery and takes thousands of cash and merchandise? Different story. Both broke the law and stole from the store. But only one, if caught, is going to jail.
     
    • Like Like x 1
  8. obgator

    obgator GC Hall of Fame

    1,803
    1,346
    2,103
    Apr 3, 2007
    He’s “Reek”-ed them
    [​IMG]
     
    • Funny Funny x 1
  9. duchen

    duchen VIP Member

    14,669
    5,383
    3,208
    Nov 25, 2017
    You keep posting your philosophical gibberish and have never mentioned a single fact in the indictment. Not one. If you can’t read that Indictment and under and the seriousness of the charges, you are a true believer
     
    • Fistbump/Thanks! Fistbump/Thanks! x 1
  10. GatorBen

    GatorBen Premium Member

    6,384
    1,070
    2,968
    Apr 9, 2007
    Did get a kick out of the tweet that it’s typical of Trump scandals in that it’s brought about by little more than stupidity.

    Because for all of the liberal talk that Trump had these records to sell to the Chinese, turns out he had them for a much, much dumber reason - to try to impress random people with the fact that he had cool documents.
     
    • Agree Agree x 5
    • Disagree Bacon! Disagree Bacon! x 1
  11. duchen

    duchen VIP Member

    14,669
    5,383
    3,208
    Nov 25, 2017
    I know that this is not ground for recusal. I was pointing out the irony. Her rulings will not get her recused. The standard requires extrajudicial bias.
     
  12. okeechobee

    okeechobee GC Hall of Fame

    10,834
    1,419
    678
    Sep 11, 2022
    You’re right. The FBI asked all these questions, because nothing she was doing was illegal. They like to bs about stuff like this with former secretaries of state for shits and giggles. And you think she handed over everything she was supposed to. Lol.

    The 12 juiciest bits from the FBI's Clinton report
     
  13. Sohogator

    Sohogator GC Hall of Fame

    3,568
    576
    358
    Aug 22, 2012
    Reading this thread I wish I could bottle up the tears of outr Trumpaloons. I could sell that for big bucks. I only hope that the hard core losers take Clay Higgins calls to take up arms to heart, cause they’ll get slaughtered if they don’t luck out and spend 25 years in prison. We are witnessing one of the best days in American History right now.
     
  14. duchen

    duchen VIP Member

    14,669
    5,383
    3,208
    Nov 25, 2017
    No
     
  15. Sohogator

    Sohogator GC Hall of Fame

    3,568
    576
    358
    Aug 22, 2012
    The low IQ base can’t change, they literally get stupider every day. What’s needed is a political death cure, and they’re doing it to themselves. They are 25-30% of the population which is enough to muck up the shithole states but capital will completely avoid those states they’ll get poorer and smaller and more irrelevant. The youth of this country will deliver the death blow.
     
    • Agree Agree x 1
  16. docspor

    docspor GC Hall of Fame

    5,871
    1,859
    3,078
    Nov 30, 2010
    sucker
     
    • Agree Agree x 1
    • Come On Man Come On Man x 1
  17. duchen

    duchen VIP Member

    14,669
    5,383
    3,208
    Nov 25, 2017
    Let’s play a game. You say Biden and Hilary broke the law. Identify the law. Identify the elements of the law broken. Identify the facts that support each element. In particular, identify specific intent if you are drawing a parallel to the charges against Trump. Lay out your position like a real lawyer.
     
    • Like Like x 2
    • Fistbump/Thanks! Fistbump/Thanks! x 1
  18. GatorBen

    GatorBen Premium Member

    6,384
    1,070
    2,968
    Apr 9, 2007
    To be clear, “Trump is great at creating unnecessary problems for himself by being an idiot” is in no way a defense of him haha
     
    • Agree Agree x 3
    • Fistbump/Thanks! Fistbump/Thanks! x 1
    • Funny Funny x 1
  19. Sohogator

    Sohogator GC Hall of Fame

    3,568
    576
    358
    Aug 22, 2012
    Whatever helps you sleep at night, but no. Just no. The dude sells anything he can make a buck on water, teddy bears, vodka, efts, straws wine steak and I’m sure I’m missing a bunch of stuff. Stolen top secrets were being marketed day one and he assuredly made copies. I bet a set of Iran invasion plans is in Bonesaw’s desk
     
    • Winner Winner x 2
  20. docspor

    docspor GC Hall of Fame

    5,871
    1,859
    3,078
    Nov 30, 2010
    sucker