Welcome home, fellow Gator.

The Gator Nation's oldest and most active insider community
Join today!

2024 NCAA Men's basketball tournament

Discussion in 'Nuttin but Net' started by gogators73, Jan 23, 2024.

  1. jeffphillips21

    jeffphillips21 GC Hall of Fame

    4,497
    1,228
    2,108
    Jun 20, 2009
    Vancouver
    I’m getting there, but not quite…yet
     
    • Like Like x 1
  2. jeffphillips21

    jeffphillips21 GC Hall of Fame

    4,497
    1,228
    2,108
    Jun 20, 2009
    Vancouver
    Meanwhile that UK loss is still pissing me off
     
    • Agree Agree x 6
    • Winner Winner x 1
  3. jeffphillips21

    jeffphillips21 GC Hall of Fame

    4,497
    1,228
    2,108
    Jun 20, 2009
    Vancouver
    Yes half from today…
     
  4. jeffphillips21

    jeffphillips21 GC Hall of Fame

    4,497
    1,228
    2,108
    Jun 20, 2009
    Vancouver
    We’ve got a very, very difficult schedule ahead
     
    • Agree Agree x 3
  5. 407king

    407king VIP Member

    3,486
    2,095
    1,998
    Dec 8, 2018
    Agreed, 10 SEC wins gets us in. Last night's win was huge, need to follow it up with a win on Saturday. If we can get to 5-5 with 8 games remaining, we'll give ourselves a chance. Would mean we pick up a Quad 1 win against UK, A&M or Auburn.

    Final 8, need to get at least 5 of them, which is manageable, imo: LSU, Vandy 2x, Missouri, @ UGA, Bama 2x.
     
    • Like Like x 1
    • Agree Agree x 1
  6. Gatorhead

    Gatorhead GC Hall of Fame

    18,005
    5,987
    3,313
    Apr 3, 2007
    Philadelphia
    At least we broke even last night in SEC play at 3-3.

    I think we will be in suspense right up until
    the SEC tourney.
     
    • Agree Agree x 1
  7. gogators73

    gogators73 GC Hall of Fame

    3,447
    431
    353
    Oct 30, 2007
    St. Petersburg, FL
    Now that we are 3-3 with a HUGE last two wins, if I was a betting man, I would guess:

    vs. (78) Georgia- Q3-- WIN
    @ (22) Kentucky- Q1-- LOSS
    @ (39) Texas A&M- Q1-- WIN
    vs. (8) Auburn- Q1-- WIN
    vs. (91) LSU- Q3-- WIN
    @ (78) Georgia- Q2-- WIN
    @ (7) Alabama- Q1-- LOSS
    vs. (234) Vanderbilt- Q4-- WIN
    vs. (126) Mizzou- Q3-- WIN
    @ (51) South Carolina- Q1-- LOSS
    vs. (7) Alabama- Q1-- WIN
    @ (234) Vanderbilt- Q3-- WIN

    That'd put us at 12-6. Obviously we could easily lose @ TAMU, vs. Auburn, or vs. Alabama which would knock us down to 10-8, but I tend to think we steal one of these tough road games and hold serve at home if we play well.

    In that 10-8 scenario, the thing that is scary is that we'd still have zero Q1 wins. Maybe UGA could sneak into the top 75 or Pitt could sneak into the top 50 to get us to a single Q1 win, but I think Nashville would still be very critical if we go 10-8 with no Q1 wins. Each year is different, but look at Rutgers' resume last year and they were left out. It was much more impressive than ours.
     
    • Informative Informative x 1
    • Optimistic Optimistic x 1
  8. murphree_hall

    murphree_hall VIP Member

    9,224
    4,610
    2,898
    Jul 11, 2019
    If we could just hit our dang free throws consistently we’d be 16-3 right now!
     
  9. WESGATORS

    WESGATORS Moderator VIP Member

    22,553
    1,382
    2,008
    Apr 3, 2007
    Other than Kentucky, which games do you think we lost due to poor FT shooting?

    Go GATORS!
    ,WESGATORS
     
  10. jeffphillips21

    jeffphillips21 GC Hall of Fame

    4,497
    1,228
    2,108
    Jun 20, 2009
    Vancouver
    Realistically UK is the only one
     
  11. murphree_hall

    murphree_hall VIP Member

    9,224
    4,610
    2,898
    Jul 11, 2019
    It’s hard to say unless I were to rewatch games. Statistically, the losses we had are hard to blame on free throw percentage with the exception of UK, but the answer really needs to be examined in context. If you hit 30-30 free throws but miss the last 4 at the end of the game and lose by 1 point, it matters when you miss as opposed to how often. Also, did your miss change momentum or some other intangible factor?

    But on the surface, I’d say you are correct to ask this question and that the statistics alone do not support my previous statement.
     
    • Like Like x 4
  12. jeffphillips21

    jeffphillips21 GC Hall of Fame

    4,497
    1,228
    2,108
    Jun 20, 2009
    Vancouver
    are you saying that someone on NBN actually admitted they might be incorrect? How refreshing
     
    • Funny Funny x 5
    • Like Like x 2
  13. murphree_hall

    murphree_hall VIP Member

    9,224
    4,610
    2,898
    Jul 11, 2019
    On second thought, I take it back.
     
    • Funny Funny x 7
    • Fistbump/Thanks! Fistbump/Thanks! x 1
  14. WESGATORS

    WESGATORS Moderator VIP Member

    22,553
    1,382
    2,008
    Apr 3, 2007
    That makes sense; in the Virginia game (for example), we're looking at a miss by Kugel (3:41, trailing by 2); a miss by Haugh (2:13, tied), and a miss by Clayton (0:51, trailing by 2). But only Kugel's and Haugh's are worth picking on because they were a combined 2 for 5 at the line. Clayton had our other miss, but he was 5 for 6. Here's the thing, though. On 2 of our 2nd half misses, we got the offensive rebound and scored again. Not how you draw it up, but it more than wipes out the miss.

    I think we're doing better at FT shooting, and here's why I say that:

    Pre-conference FT shooting: 219/335 (.654)
    SEC FT shooting: 109/149 (.732)

    Individually:

    Richard (+12.74%)
    Clayton (+12.5%)
    Pullin (+3.33%)
    (but also, everybody has a better FT% in SEC play except for Kugel)

    Also, our top 3 FT shooters in pre-conference were shooting 43.2% of FTs, in SEC play, they have shot 49% of FTs.

    As a team, we've gone from worst in the conference (overall FT%) to 9th in the conference (SEC-only FT%), and 3rd in the SEC in total FTs made (again, SEC-only). It's not a strength, but it's far less of a weakness.

    Go GATORS!
    ,WESGATORS
     
    • Informative Informative x 4
    • Like Like x 1
    • Fistbump/Thanks! Fistbump/Thanks! x 1
  15. WESGATORS

    WESGATORS Moderator VIP Member

    22,553
    1,382
    2,008
    Apr 3, 2007
    Also, last night, MSU got within 6 points late (3+ minutes left). Our boys proceeded to hit 10 of their next 10 FTs including the first set by Condon (4 for 4 down that stretch). If he misses that front end of the first set, who knows if that gives MSU the opportunity they need to derail us down the stretch. Those were big FTs from someone who was shooting below 65% on the year.

    Go GATORS!
    ,WESGATORS
     
    • Agree Agree x 8
    • Like Like x 2
    • Winner Winner x 1
  16. grant1

    grant1 GC Hall of Fame

    3,432
    555
    408
    Nov 10, 2009
    I long for the days where we argue about being a 3, 4 or 5 seed. 6 seed or lower was not part of the discussion
     
    • Like Like x 1
  17. oragator1

    oragator1 Hurricane Hunter Premium Member

    23,194
    5,849
    3,513
    Apr 3, 2007
    Our NET is 42, our RPI 43, our ELO 34 and KenPom 35. We would be about a 10 seed right now, quad one wins or not.
     
    • Fistbump/Thanks! Fistbump/Thanks! x 1
  18. jeffphillips21

    jeffphillips21 GC Hall of Fame

    4,497
    1,228
    2,108
    Jun 20, 2009
    Vancouver
    That’s more like it
     
    • Like Like x 1
    • Agree Agree x 1
    • Funny Funny x 1
  19. gatordavisl

    gatordavisl VIP Member

    32,176
    55,005
    3,753
    Apr 8, 2007
    northern MN
    I feel like there is a difficult stretch w KY, A&M, Auburn, but that much of the latter portion of the SEC schedule opens up. We get Bama 2x which is another challenge. Getting a win in one of those would be big.
     
    • Agree Agree x 2
    • Like Like x 1
  20. gatordavisl

    gatordavisl VIP Member

    32,176
    55,005
    3,753
    Apr 8, 2007
    northern MN
    [​IMG]
     
    • Funny Funny x 4