Latest in IVF - it's in danger

Certainly, you have proven this.

 

My SIL has one and is undergoing treatments now. That two year-old seems super hyped about being here. Glad your type couldn’t stop him.

Your mashup of Nazi social planning and religious zealotry is defcon 1 weird.

 

You are playing the short game. I'm playing the long game. There is a king above all of other kings. There are courts above all other courts. There is a government above all other governments. It might take a while for these things to shake out, but they will. The highest king, the highest court, and the highest government will win. It is best to side with the highest court. There will be receipts and definitive proof of who stood with the highest court and who did not.

 

Would you defend rape if your sweet two year old niece was born as a result of one?

 

I'm trying to understand your world too. You would have someone go through a background check to become a teacher or to possess a firearm because of the harm someone could do. On a scale of 1-10 how concerned would you be with the prospect of a male pedophile renting a womb to buy a baby from a surrogate mother? Would you support a rigorous background check in such a scenario to ensure that a person entering into a surrogate contract is not a pedophile?

 

He can't spell IVF, let alone articulate a cogent thought on the topic.

 

Nope

what a sick question.

 

You are playing a fantasy game. You live your life according to an extremely flawed 2,000 year old book written by a bunch of men who were just as terrified of dying as you are.

 

Obviously, I know how most people would answer the question, but the question was designed to get you to probe the relationship between the new life of a human being and the cause that brought that new life into existence. One can celebrate the person, while also condemning the evil act that led to the conception of the new person. The idea that you have to defend both is false.

 

Not to mention a complete failure of logic.

 

There you again with the conflation.

 

“The vote comes as Democrats in Washington, hoping to drive a wedge among Republicans, prepare to hold a vote on legislation to protect IVF …”

From your article, that’s revealing. Not quite as altruistic as the vote might sound.

 

Oh, I'd say it was 20-30 percent altruistic. The rest political.

 

Very educational video from a former doctor who left the IVF profession for moral and ethical reasons:

 

Kind of hilarious how Republicans went from "No, we're definitely not coming after IVF" to "You know, I think we are going after IVF" in no time at all.
House Republican proposes barring defense funding for IVF, says it’s ‘morally wrong’

 

So they are going to hostage national security to block IVF?

 

I doubt many will watch a 70 min YouTube video. can you give a brief summary?

 

As soon as Tommy the helmet tester Tubberville finds out they will.