Welcome home, fellow Gator.

The Gator Nation's oldest and most active insider community
Join today!
  1. Hi there... Can you please quickly check to make sure your email address is up to date here? Just in case we need to reach out to you or you lose your password. Muchero thanks!

Kavanaugh Hearing

Discussion in 'GC Hall of Fame' started by ursidman, Sep 4, 2018.

  1. CaptUSMCNole

    CaptUSMCNole Premium Member

    3,399
    232
    393
    May 23, 2007
    NCR
    It’s a background check, not an investigation. I pointed that out when this thing started on Friday.
     
    • Agree Agree x 2
  2. g8trjax

    g8trjax GC Hall of Fame

    5,219
    460
    293
    Jun 1, 2007

     
    • Informative Informative x 4
    • Agree Agree x 1
  3. gator_lawyer

    gator_lawyer VIP Member

    18,182
    6,156
    3,213
    Oct 30, 2017
    Yea, you can spare me the semantics. They're investigating his background.
     
    • Agree Agree x 1
  4. gator_lawyer

    gator_lawyer VIP Member

    18,182
    6,156
    3,213
    Oct 30, 2017
    Well, I commend Republicans on their effort to alienate women who aren't hardcore conservatives.
     
  5. g8trjax

    g8trjax GC Hall of Fame

    5,219
    460
    293
    Jun 1, 2007
     
    • Informative Informative x 2
  6. gator_lawyer

    gator_lawyer VIP Member

    18,182
    6,156
    3,213
    Oct 30, 2017
    This is interesting. Who wrote the letter?
     
  7. CaptUSMCNole

    CaptUSMCNole Premium Member

    3,399
    232
    393
    May 23, 2007
    NCR
    No they have already done that. This is a supplemental check into some allegations. The principals have been contacted and the agents made a decision whether or not further details were required. Apparently they are ready to finish the supplemental information.
     
  8. CaptUSMCNole

    CaptUSMCNole Premium Member

    3,399
    232
    393
    May 23, 2007
    NCR
    This has become so public and gone on so long, I think a lot of the information coming out now is what you avoid by doing a quiet background check by the FBI or investigation by JC staffers, when allegations are not publicly shared.
     
  9. gator_lawyer

    gator_lawyer VIP Member

    18,182
    6,156
    3,213
    Oct 30, 2017
    What happens during a "supplemental check?" Are you saying that they look into specific allegations? Or phrased another way, are you saying that they INVESTIGATE specific allegations? ;)
     
  10. rajinGator

    rajinGator Moderator VIP Member

    14,612
    2,253
    1,778
    Apr 3, 2007
    Orlando
    Ford's ex boyfriend.
     
  11. gator_lawyer

    gator_lawyer VIP Member

    18,182
    6,156
    3,213
    Oct 30, 2017
    What's his name? I'll be interested to see if anything comes of this. However, it's hard to lend credence to an anonymous ex. It's also noteworthy that I see nothing on the letter indicating that it's a sworn affidavit (i.e., no penalty of perjury). Nevertheless, seems like a good thing to have the FBI investigate. Of course, they'd have to actually speak with Dr. Ford. Maybe we can have them speak with Judge Kavanaugh too. ;)
     
  12. ursidman

    ursidman VIP Member

    14,336
    22,644
    3,348
    Sep 27, 2007
    Bug Tussle NC
    Just when you think Trump has hit a new low, he pulls out a shovel and starts digging. This "man" is a disgrace and unfit for office.
     
    • Agree Agree x 2
    • Funny Funny x 1
  13. StrangeGator

    StrangeGator VIP Member

    29,857
    2,097
    1,578
    Apr 3, 2007
    Chicago
    My wife started screaming at the TV while we were listening to his speech on the news tonight.
     
    • Like Like x 1
    • Agree Agree x 1
  14. ursidman

    ursidman VIP Member

    14,336
    22,644
    3,348
    Sep 27, 2007
    Bug Tussle NC
    It was a despicable thing to do ..... and they ate it up. Chanting "Lock her up". I don't know what to think.
     
    • Like Like x 1
    • Disagree Bacon! Disagree Bacon! x 1
  15. gator_lawyer

    gator_lawyer VIP Member

    18,182
    6,156
    3,213
    Oct 30, 2017
    What goes around comes around. Trump will get his in the end.
     
    • Agree Agree x 1
    • Disagree Bacon! Disagree Bacon! x 1
  16. GatorBen

    GatorBen Premium Member

    6,376
    1,068
    2,968
    Apr 9, 2007
    Grassley’s letter to Dr. Ford’s attorneys today requesting documentary evidence (therapist notes, polygraph results and recordings, etc.) specifically references the Committee having received a sworn statement from one of her ex-boyfriends saying he personally witnessed her coaching a friend on polygraph examinations:



    I suspect if Grassley is writing letters referring to it, Committee investigators have talked to the guy.
     
  17. OklahomaGator

    OklahomaGator Jedi Administrator Moderator VIP Member

    124,014
    164,188
    116,973
    Apr 3, 2007
    It appears Dr. Ford's story is starting to fall apart.
     
    • Agree Agree x 3
  18. Nawlens Gator

    Nawlens Gator GC Hall of Fame

    3,908
    61
    253
    Apr 9, 2007
    Dr. Ford is just a lying puppet for the liberal socialistic democratic party. Praise be to honest people like Trump.
     
    • Come On Man Come On Man x 2
    • Funny Funny x 1
  19. gator_lawyer

    gator_lawyer VIP Member

    18,182
    6,156
    3,213
    Oct 30, 2017
    Interesting. However, if the letter he received is the same one above, Grassley misrepresented the substance of the letter. The ex-boyfriend never said she coached her friend. It's the same point you made earlier with the Swetnick affidavit. The language the ex used in that letter only says that she explained what a polygraph entailed and familiarized her with the process.

    There's also another significant implication. If the letter was sent to the Committee and then ended up in the hands of Fox News, it's not hard to connect the dots there. Since the Republicans on the Committee are leaking information, if I were Dr. Ford's attorney, I'd send Grassley a very short and to the point response about where he can shove his letter.

    I'm interested to see Dr. Ford's response. The only allegation in the letter that conflicts with her testimony is the part about the polygraph.
     
    • Funny Funny x 1
  20. mdgator05

    mdgator05 Premium Member

    16,244
    2,096
    1,718
    Dec 9, 2010
    Yeah, pretty clear that the Republicans on the panel went with the leak everything strategy tonight, with the Swetnick thing, the Ford housing thing, and this. I'm wondering if it is related to this:

    FBI expands inquiry into Ford allegations - CNNPolitics

    That could also just be the FBI trying to cover their butt from a PR perspective, but it is interesting when they obviously just leaked out a bunch of stuff that they had.
     
    • Agree Agree x 1