Welcome home, fellow Gator.

The Gator Nation's oldest and most active insider community
Join today!

Kavanaugh Hearing

Discussion in 'GC Hall of Fame' started by ursidman, Sep 4, 2018.

  1. duchen

    duchen VIP Member

    14,060
    5,221
    3,208
    Nov 25, 2017
    Disgraceful demeanor by Kavanaugh. He is a sitting federal Judge. If a witness had behaved that way in a courtroom, in his courtroom, the Judge would have admonished him to stop yelling. If a witness started asking questions of the panel of questioners, the Judge would have shut him down. Dr. Ford’s statement was the product of a “vast left wing” conspiracy? Would have had to be for the hearing to be a left wing conspiracy. Revenge by the Clintons? Kavanaugh has complete meltdown indicative of a complete lack of credibility, particularly for someone who should have been comfortable in the forum.
     
    • Agree Agree x 6
    • Winner Winner x 2
    • Like Like x 1
    • Dislike Dislike x 1
  2. HallGator

    HallGator Senile Administrator

    49,756
    1,802
    2,868
    Apr 3, 2007
    Outer Limits
    One of the things that really stands out about it is there has been little moderation needed. People have become testy, which is to be expected, but for the most part, it has been an interesting thread with very little insulting.
     
    • Agree Agree x 2
    • Like Like x 1
  3. VAg8r1

    VAg8r1 GC Hall of Fame

    20,725
    1,710
    1,763
    Apr 8, 2007
    My previous post was speculation based on Kavanaugh's documented behavior.
    Despite his denials Kavanaugh had a reputation as heavy drinker, perhaps to the point of blackout, in both high school and college.
    From Mark Judge's book:
    Rather than a fictitious character "Bart O'Kavanaugh" is almost certainly Brett Kavanaugh.
    And then there is his roommate from Yale
    Kavanaugh became 'aggressive,' 'belligerent' when drinking, says Yale freshman roommate
     
  4. OklahomaGator

    OklahomaGator Jedi Administrator Moderator VIP Member

    122,912
    163,825
    116,973
    Apr 3, 2007
    For the record the longest thread in the GC Thread Hall of Fame is 1156 pages. Just in case anyone is curious.
     
    • Winner Winner x 1
    • Informative Informative x 1
  5. OklahomaGator

    OklahomaGator Jedi Administrator Moderator VIP Member

    122,912
    163,825
    116,973
    Apr 3, 2007
    If the final vote is Tuesday as scheduled, I doubt this thread breaks the record.
     
    • Agree Agree x 1
  6. Gator715

    Gator715 GC Hall of Fame

    6,889
    839
    2,103
    Dec 6, 2015
    Never forget...

    "The Thread"

    Absolutely legendary...
     
    • Winner Winner x 1
  7. Gator715

    Gator715 GC Hall of Fame

    6,889
    839
    2,103
    Dec 6, 2015
    What we're only 20% of the way there? :D:D:D
     
  8. OklahomaGator

    OklahomaGator Jedi Administrator Moderator VIP Member

    122,912
    163,825
    116,973
    Apr 3, 2007
    I agree, especially for a topic that everyone has strong opinions.
     
    • Like Like x 1
    • Agree Agree x 1
  9. OklahomaGator

    OklahomaGator Jedi Administrator Moderator VIP Member

    122,912
    163,825
    116,973
    Apr 3, 2007
    Also, set a record for the most thread title changes...…@tilly, isn't that right?
     
    • Informative Informative x 1
  10. duchen

    duchen VIP Member

    14,060
    5,221
    3,208
    Nov 25, 2017
    Anyone know why the Pubs pulled the professional sex crimes prosecutor right after she noted that Judge Kavanaugh’s calendar showed his attendance at a party with PJ and Judge on a Thursday early in July and then started yelling about what a sham the hearing is? They supposedly hired the prosecutor to search for the truth and it would seem that they should have allowed her to question the nominee with the same vigor as Dr. Ford?
     
    • Winner Winner x 1
    • Best Post Ever Best Post Ever x 1
  11. LouisvilleGator

    LouisvilleGator GC Hall of Fame

    1,180
    189
    1,933
    Oct 16, 2012
    But I thought this was a job interview and not a courtroom trial.
     
    • Like Like x 1
  12. BLING

    BLING GC Hall of Fame

    8,678
    844
    2,843
    Apr 16, 2007
    I just think the "energize the base" argument works both ways.

    I mean yeah, I guess temporarily it might be seen as a "win" for the dems and some far righties who demand "victory" would be outraged that they didn't get a political score, perhaps turning on their own to a small extent.

    But on the other hand, don't you think this would be useful for the Hannity's and Limbaugh's of the world to whip their audiences into a tizzy about the "dirty politics' the dems played? It would give them months and months of ammo, arguing that their guy got "Borked".

    I just think these factors sort of neutralize each other out. Considering that I truly believe the correct and logical thing to do would be to wait a week or two and investigate the allegations properly, I just see rushing to vote is the clear net loser as far as elections go. Whereas I just don't see any true downside (other than very short term ones) to either delaying or even withdrawing and going with another guy off the Federalist list. Even if on paper Kavenaugh is highly qualified, and I"m sure he is, I just don't see how any rational person could think he comported himself well at all at today's hearing.
     
    • Winner Winner x 1
  13. duchen

    duchen VIP Member

    14,060
    5,221
    3,208
    Nov 25, 2017
    I am still traumatized by Page 136. Brings back dark memories of visits to the dermatologist when I was a teenager.
     
    • Funny Funny x 2
  14. gator_lawyer

    gator_lawyer VIP Member

    16,846
    5,787
    3,213
    Oct 30, 2017
    Kavanaugh is a disgraceful nominee.

    She was hindering their case to ram Kavanaugh through.
     
    • Agree Agree x 2
    • Winner Winner x 1
  15. OklahomaGator

    OklahomaGator Jedi Administrator Moderator VIP Member

    122,912
    163,825
    116,973
    Apr 3, 2007
    I didn't watch the whole thing continuously this afternoon but at one point I seem to recall her saying she had no more questions. It could have been at the end of her 5 minutes too. I left and came back and the Senators were questioning him.
     
  16. duchen

    duchen VIP Member

    14,060
    5,221
    3,208
    Nov 25, 2017
    Witnesses in Congress are under oath and subject to the rules of perjury and contempt of Congress. And lawyers and judges are always subject to the canons of ethics. Not a good idea to yell at the people deciding whether you get a job.
     
    • Agree Agree x 2
  17. duchen

    duchen VIP Member

    14,060
    5,221
    3,208
    Nov 25, 2017
    They kicked her out
     
    • Agree Agree x 2
  18. BLING

    BLING GC Hall of Fame

    8,678
    844
    2,843
    Apr 16, 2007
    Pretty obvious, it was because Kavanaugh was choking. He was being double teamed by both the dems AND this prosecutor. So instead of that scenario, they went strongly to bat for him. After the Graham outburst, Kavenaugh barely had to speak when it was the Republicans turn! After Graham, they all pretty much took the full 5 minutes to make statements leaving Kavenaugh to just sit there.

    Her questions were kind of terrible anyway though. Know what might have led her to better questioning? If she had more information from an actual investigation!
     
    • Agree Agree x 3
  19. duchen

    duchen VIP Member

    14,060
    5,221
    3,208
    Nov 25, 2017
    So, are you saying we should try harder?
     
    • Funny Funny x 4
  20. gator_lawyer

    gator_lawyer VIP Member

    16,846
    5,787
    3,213
    Oct 30, 2017
    It's going to be 52-48 at least. Manchin is flipping.