Welcome home, fellow Gator.

The Gator Nation's oldest and most active insider community
Join today!
  1. Hi there... Can you please quickly check to make sure your email address is up to date here? Just in case we need to reach out to you or you lose your password. Muchero thanks!

Judge Rules in favor of Kids

Discussion in 'Too Hot for Swamp Gas' started by G8trGr8t, Aug 14, 2023.

  1. G8trGr8t

    G8trGr8t Premium Member

    32,483
    12,170
    3,693
    Aug 26, 2008
    in Montana lawsuit to stop law that says that climate change cannot be considered when evaluating state business.

    Court sides with kids who sued Montana over climate change | The Hill

    In a new ruling Monday, District Judge Kathy Seeley ruled in their favor — and against a Montana state law that prohibited the consideration of climate impacts in the process for approving energy projects. “By prohibiting analysis of GHG emissions and corresponding impacts to the climate…the [Montana Environmental Policy Act] Limitation violates Youth Plaintiffs’ right to a clean and healthful environment and is unconstitutional on its face,” Seeley wrote.

    The case follows other similar cases around the country about children’s rights to protection from climate change that failed to gain traction in the court system, including one that made such claims at the national level but was thrown out a few years ago.

    However, the Montana case invoked a provision in the state’s constitution that establishes a right to a “a clean and healthful environment” — which the judge appeared to reference in her decision.

    In a written statement, Julia Olson, chief legal counsel of Our Children’s Trust, which represented the youths, hailed the decision as a “turning point.” “Today, for the first time in U.S. history, a court ruled on the merits of a case that the government violated the constitutional rights of children through laws and actions that promote fossil fuels, ignore climate change, and disproportionately imperil young people,” Olson said.
     
    • Like Like x 1
    • Informative Informative x 1
  2. tampagtr

    tampagtr VIP Member

    17,616
    2,861
    1,618
    Apr 3, 2007
    This will likely prove to be significant
     
    • Agree Agree x 2
    • Informative Informative x 1
  3. G8trGr8t

    G8trGr8t Premium Member

    32,483
    12,170
    3,693
    Aug 26, 2008
    if it is upheld.
     
    • Agree Agree x 1
  4. tampagtr

    tampagtr VIP Member

    17,616
    2,861
    1,618
    Apr 3, 2007
    Yes and no. Even if it is overturned, which you have to acknowledge the strong possibility of just based upon violence without careful analysis, I think it still makes an impact. For lack of a better term, it's a shot across the bow of generational climate politics whether that'll make a difference or not ultimately, I don't know. A lot of complex threads here. Just some thoughts off the top of my head
     
    • Like Like x 1