Welcome home, fellow Gator.

The Gator Nation's oldest and most active insider community
Join today!

Jan 6 Committee: New Bombshell Testimony and Evidence (6/28, 1pm)

Discussion in 'Too Hot for Swamp Gas' started by citygator, Jun 27, 2022.

  1. duchen

    duchen VIP Member

    14,060
    5,221
    3,208
    Nov 25, 2017
    . He would deny this under oath anyway. We know this. So what.
     
  2. gator95

    gator95 GC Hall of Fame

    7,561
    807
    2,013
    Apr 3, 2007
    I voted Johnson in 2016 and abstained from voting for President in 2020. But thanks for playing.
     
  3. gator95

    gator95 GC Hall of Fame

    7,561
    807
    2,013
    Apr 3, 2007
    The rationalization from the left is so funny.
     
    • Agree Agree x 2
  4. duchen

    duchen VIP Member

    14,060
    5,221
    3,208
    Nov 25, 2017
    Disagree with the “legal maneuvering” argument. Endeavoring to submit delegates from states who didn’t send them is an attempt to commit fraud and it was an integral part of the plan. Especially when founded on knowingly false claims of election fraud.Coming up with a bullshit legal doctrine doesn’t vitiate the fraudulent intent of any of those acts. And, part of that was the rejection of legal delegates based in the false claims.
     
    • Agree Agree x 2
    • Winner Winner x 1
    • Best Post Ever Best Post Ever x 1
  5. GatorNorth

    GatorNorth Premium Member Premium Member

    17,139
    8,055
    3,203
    Apr 3, 2007
    Atlanta
    Funny how you feel like Mueller and the 1/6 committee are kangaroo courts, but probably not Ken Starr’s investigation of Clinton or the umpteen Benghazi hearings that the Republicans held to cover the same material over and over again (when HRC, who I despise, voluntarily sat for 11 hours of questioning as compared to these Trump stooges who ignore lawfully issued subpoena’s in flagrant violation of the law, which [and I believe you may have a law degree] you fail to condemn). And you completely believe a debunked D’Sousa documentary that you’ve admittedly not watched as being fact, but criticize hearings you’ve not watched as fiction.

    But you’re objective and it’s only the Dems who are biased and running things that are illegitimate?

    GMAFB. You’re a smart guy. At least be intellectually honest with yourself if not with the rest of us.
     
    Last edited: Jun 30, 2022
    • Winner Winner x 6
    • Fistbump/Thanks! Fistbump/Thanks! x 2
    • Optimistic Optimistic x 1
    • Best Post Ever Best Post Ever x 1
  6. gator95

    gator95 GC Hall of Fame

    7,561
    807
    2,013
    Apr 3, 2007

    You and the dems with the dog and pony show:

    [​IMG]
     
    • Funny Funny x 2
  7. gatorchamps960608

    gatorchamps960608 GC Hall of Fame

    4,507
    939
    2,463
    Jul 4, 2020
    Aww, somebody's feelings are all hurt they are being mean to his orange hero.
     
    • Come On Man Come On Man x 1
  8. gator95

    gator95 GC Hall of Fame

    7,561
    807
    2,013
    Apr 3, 2007
    Again, learn to read. I hate trump.

     
    • Agree Agree x 1
    • Funny Funny x 1
  9. ursidman

    ursidman VIP Member

    13,962
    22,584
    3,348
    Sep 27, 2007
    Bug Tussle NC
    Provides context to believability of his current not under oath statements?
     
  10. WC53

    WC53 GC Hall of Fame

    4,706
    994
    2,088
    Oct 17, 2015
    Old City
    I hate Trump, but I support him to own the libs?
     
    • Best Post Ever Best Post Ever x 2
    • Disagree Bacon! Disagree Bacon! x 1
  11. Orange_and_Bluke

    Orange_and_Bluke Premium Member

    9,584
    2,227
    3,038
    Dec 16, 2015
    You’re not paying attention.
     
  12. dynogator

    dynogator VIP Member

    6,373
    318
    418
    Apr 9, 2007
    Are you seriously comparing Trump's months-long efforts to overturn the election by any means, including violence, with random, procedural objections by a small number of Democrats?
     
    • Winner Winner x 2
  13. gator95

    gator95 GC Hall of Fame

    7,561
    807
    2,013
    Apr 3, 2007
    If this is directed at me, where am i supporting trump? Hell, i hope he does get indicted, but not from this dog and pony show.
     
  14. ursidman

    ursidman VIP Member

    13,962
    22,584
    3,348
    Sep 27, 2007
    Bug Tussle NC
    This is an investigatory hearing They cannot indict or convict. That’s why there is no defense counsel. The DOJ will have to bring trump to justice if warranted
     
    • Fistbump/Thanks! Fistbump/Thanks! x 1
  15. gator95

    gator95 GC Hall of Fame

    7,561
    807
    2,013
    Apr 3, 2007
    Like I've said, there isn't any credible evidence to have the DOJ indict Trump. So it's just a dog and pony show.
     
    • Fistbump/Thanks! Fistbump/Thanks! x 1
    • Winner Winner x 1
  16. dynogator

    dynogator VIP Member

    6,373
    318
    418
    Apr 9, 2007
    I agree with the dog and pony show part. This should be happening in a court of law, with Trump and his co-conspirators as defendants.
     
    • Funny Funny x 2
    • Winner Winner x 1
  17. gatorchamps960608

    gatorchamps960608 GC Hall of Fame

    4,507
    939
    2,463
    Jul 4, 2020
    This shows you know nothing about this wide ranging conspiracy to steal the election.
     
    • Agree Agree x 2
    • Funny Funny x 1
  18. gator95

    gator95 GC Hall of Fame

    7,561
    807
    2,013
    Apr 3, 2007
    Wonder why the DOJ didn't do that...
     
    • Winner Winner x 1
  19. gator95

    gator95 GC Hall of Fame

    7,561
    807
    2,013
    Apr 3, 2007
    I don't and neither does most of the country. You will figure that part out in Nov.
     
    • Like Like x 1
    • Fistbump/Thanks! Fistbump/Thanks! x 1
  20. ursidman

    ursidman VIP Member

    13,962
    22,584
    3,348
    Sep 27, 2007
    Bug Tussle NC
    Then I would hazard a guess you haven’t watched any or much of the hearings.

    The committee’s mission is to investigate the attempted insurrection and they are doing that. The investigation cannot help but focus on trump.
     
    • Agree Agree x 1
    • Funny Funny x 1