Jan. 6 committee allegedly suppressed testimony showing Trump admin pushed for National Guard presen

Weird comment. So you are saying that 100s of cops WEREN'T beaten during the violent protest element of Trump's conspiracy to overturn an election?

Should be interesting to see if people choose to believe your words, and live in a fact-less alternate reality, or to believe the actual footage that they saw.

 

What’s the goal of this post, fl? It is simply a personal attack without even a passing mention of any issues.

 

You don’t think the only two options were 10,000 and none?

 

Officers’ Injuries, Including Concussions, Show Scope of Violence at Capitol Riot (Published 2021)

 

I’d say that 138 were injured, which is not hundreds. The range of injuries were wide. some minor and some not so minor.
So, there's no indication that 100s of officers were beaten.

 

Davis’ post was inflammatory, but at least it was geared toward the topic, suggesting that he is doubting the evidence for the article’s claim. Your post wasn’t even a response. Rather, it was just a personal jab that could be applied to any post regardless of the content. What is the value of that?

 

Now wait a minute, all of us who read too hot know that cops are all liars and masters of filing false reports.

 

And to think any of us that question the honesty or anything about the J6 committee are not patriots and do not care this country.

 

Let's say this is true and Trump offered 10k troops but was turned down. Then we have to believe that as President of the United States it was completely out of his hands to stop what was unfolding at the Capitol. Is that it?

We all watched it on TV the same as him. He was just completely powerless other than a single tweet hours into the event (after multiple advisors begged him to do something, anything to stop it)?

His inaction on that day just doesn't square with him allegedly wanting to provide 10k troops.

 

LOL. So maybe not "beaten", but definitely assaulted? And you're clearly OK with that, because we all saw it happen.

Also; no. No hemming and hawing about what "beaten" technically means. You're getting ready to vote for a criminal who conspired to disenfranchise 10s of millions of people. The beaten police officers were just collateral damage. So play your 'change the subject' game somewhere else.

 

The lengths some of us (YOU, actually) will go to to defend a criminal's criminal conspiracy to defraud voters by overturning an election.......

Yes, I think you may be on to a hugely relevant point - if only 138 (?) are technically reported injured, then clearly "100s" weren't assaulted...........and therefore, ths un-American criminal conspiracy is A-OK !!

 

Oh look at you - wordsmithing for a criminal traitor! How cute!!

I think we all know what assault is. And when about 140 cops need to go to the hospital, there's clearly been a lot of assault.

Lol bro. Not playing games - YOU were the playing games bro!

If about 140 went to the hospital, it's not really lying to say 100s were assaulted.

But it's fun to see you defend your criminal, and excuse make for beating police. You go, bro!!