Jack Smith Ditching His Case Against Trump Is Not A Concession, It’s A Coverup

You are wrong.

 

The documents case against Trump was frivolous?

 

Please identify the case(s) Mueller brought against Trump?

The underlying legal premise of your article is absolutely flawed.

 

We should make him defend the assertions and opinions of the author.

 

This is an article about whether or not Thomas was right on saying Smith's appointment was not legitimate and in accordance with the law. The author makes a very big jump by assuming that Smith ending the investigation is somehow a cover up to protect the results of Mueller's investigation by not allowing the 11th circuit to address the legality of his appointment rather than just inline with DoJ standing doctrine that the sitting POTUS cannot be federally prosecuted.

 

that is so stupid. It's not even merely ignorant, which I guess is refreshing.

I triple dare you to prove your assertion with facts.

Before you begin, would you like a definition of the word facts? Just asking to save some time.

 

If federal indictments are vacated, that’s yeah, if that’s not evidence of frivolity, I don’t know what is.

 

The reason they've been vacated is because Trump is effectively immune from prosecution not because the allegations against him were false. Multiple grand juries found that there was probable cause to Trump committed multiple crimes. Thanks to the SCOTUS, a holding by the DOJ Office of Legal Counsel and the reality that he can make all the charges against him disappear after he takes office Donald Trump is effectively above the law. It's sovereign immunity in the original meaning of the term (not to be confused with the current legal meaning) under which the King cannot be prosecuted for crimes.

 

Hillary worked from home on her computer and doesn't archive some email promptly: "Lock her up! Lock her up!"
Trump hordes top secret documents in his resort bathroom and refuses to return them: "It's a conspiracy against dear leader!"

 

This is a dumb thread. Trump can't be prosecuted for the next 4 years, and will probably pardon himself to assure the case won't be resurrected once his second failed administration is over.

 

Yes, because the Biden DOJ was weaponizing the government against political opponents and bringing frivolous indictments against Donald J. Trump, the SCOTUS had to intervene to render those indictments DOA, pointless and yes, frivolous. If the highest court in the land says the charges were frivolous, they were frivolous. I'm sorry I won't accept a random butthurt message board Democrat's take over the SCOTUS. Siding with the prosecution after the high court says the charges were warrantless is about as un-American as it gets.

 

I’ll be surprised if DJT makes it 4 years to be honest.