Welcome home, fellow Gator.

The Gator Nation's oldest and most active insider community
Join today!
  1. Hi there... Can you please quickly check to make sure your email address is up to date here? Just in case we need to reach out to you or you lose your password. Muchero thanks!

Interesting read: Robert B. Reich: How the DOGE billionaires plan to kill Medicaid

Discussion in 'Too Hot for Swamp Gas' started by GatorJMDZ, Dec 16, 2024 at 11:28 PM.

  1. GatorJMDZ

    GatorJMDZ gatorjack VIP Member

    25,349
    2,696
    1,868
    Apr 3, 2007
    The author suggests a three-prong approach will save the US hundreds of billions. Medicaid is an easier target than Social Security or Medicare as it aids primarily poor children and people with little political voice. Last year the federal government and states combined contributed to pay out $880 Billion in Medicaid benefits.

    Lopping the head off that beast must have Musk and that smarmy guy literally salivating.

    Here's how they'll do it.
    1. Turn Medicaid into block grants. Some Pubs are already on record supporting this. As the number of recipients increase, states will have to allocate additional money or cut recipients. Guess what direction the red states will be going?

    2. Impose a work requirement which will cause 500,000 recipients, mostly medically unable to work, to lose their benefits saving $100 billion over the next decade. Some states have implemented this, got ill recipients kicked off the rolls and save significant money. No word on how those ill people who couldn't work are getting along. The exercise should be good for them, right?

    3. Cut back the expansion of Medicaid that came with the Affordable Care Act. Hundreds of thousands of families earning under $43,000/year will lose their subsidized health insurance.

    I guess the good news is that as long as you're not a poor child or not so ill than you can't work or your family earns more than $43,000/year, these changes shouldn't affect you. On the other hand, if you are a Medicaid recipient and you voted for these people, this is what you asked for. Enjoy.


    MSN
     
    Last edited: Dec 17, 2024 at 3:44 AM
    • Informative Informative x 2
  2. GratefulGator

    GratefulGator GC Hall of Fame

    1,489
    514
    1,983
    Oct 15, 2016
    Boulder Colorado
    I am pro-Medicaid all the way. It is way cheaper to provide Medicaid to folks which helps to prevent and catch and treat serious chronic diseases.

    Otherwise, these people will inundate and overwhelm our Emergency Rooms and hospitals for end of life care because these maladies were not caught early, which costs way more than spending the money up front.

    "Benjamin Franklin was on to something when he famously said in the 1700s, “an ounce of prevention is worth a pound of cure.” Today, this saying rings true when it comes to the importance of health screenings."

    An ounce of prevention is worth a pound of cure - Northern Light Health.

     
  3. slocala

    slocala VIP Member

    3,295
    783
    2,028
    Jan 11, 2009
    LOL. The “E” in DOGE = “efficiency”. Efficiency is achieving maximum productivity with minimum wasted effort and expense. Article is about reducing the productivity, not the effort.

    maybe the “E” should stand for “elimination”
     
  4. ATLGATORFAN

    ATLGATORFAN Premium Member

    3,748
    981
    2,153
    Aug 10, 2015
    • Like Like x 1
  5. g8orbill

    g8orbill Old Gator Moderator VIP Member

    126,063
    57,297
    114,663
    Apr 3, 2007
    Clermont, Fl
    Reich is a way to the left liberal