Welcome home, fellow Gator.

The Gator Nation's oldest and most active insider community
Join today!
  1. Hi there... Can you please quickly check to make sure your email address is up to date here? Just in case we need to reach out to you or you lose your password. Muchero thanks!

Harris adds her policy support to her website

Discussion in 'Too Hot for Swamp Gas' started by citygator, Sep 9, 2024.

Page 2 of 2
  1. Sep 9, 2024 #21
    gatordavisl

    gatordavisl VIP Member

    32,381
    55,072
    3,753
    Apr 8, 2007
    northern MN
    Feel free to add your analysis.
     
  2. Sep 9, 2024 #22
    citygator

    citygator VIP Member

    12,035
    2,629
    3,303
    Apr 3, 2007
    Charlotte
    People can trust Harris’ details or Trump’s details, lol.
     
    • Funny Funny x 1
  3. Sep 9, 2024 #23
    gatorpa

    gatorpa GC Hall of Fame

    11,907
    1,168
    698
    Sep 5, 2010
    East Coast of FL
    Since I’m not voting for Trump I don’t care what he says.
    He’s not much different when it comes to details as he was 4 years ago.

    Harris on the other hand had a voting record, was on record during the 2020 primaries and now it appears she’s jumped to the middle.

    Not falling for that BS.

    I’d bet even money if she was running in a primary she wouldn’t get 20% of the Dem vote. Only reason she is doing as well as she has is because she isn’t Trump.
    Can you honestly say you would chose her over some of the other Dem candidates from 2020?

    Hell of a pickle we got here.
     
    • Like Like x 1
    • Winner Winner x 1
  4. Sep 10, 2024 #24
    GatorJMDZ

    GatorJMDZ gatorjack VIP Member

    25,410
    2,709
    1,868
    Apr 3, 2007
    Nope. Assuming someone has a properly aligned set of morals, it is a ridiculously easy choice.
     
    • Agree Agree x 1
  5. Sep 10, 2024 #25
    citygator

    citygator VIP Member

    12,035
    2,629
    3,303
    Apr 3, 2007
    Charlotte
    I think she is fine. No matter what Democrat was up you’d have some issue with her or him. I like a lot of them and they are all human with things they do well and poorly. None of them is psychotic like Trump. If he was running as a democrat I’d be voting for Nikki or whoever they ran.
     
    • Agree Agree x 1
    • Funny Funny x 1
    • Optimistic Optimistic x 1
  6. Sep 10, 2024 #26
    GatorTheo

    GatorTheo All American

    339
    88
    1,833
    Jun 22, 2007
    My analysis doesn't matter. I don't have to debate her.
     
  7. Sep 10, 2024 #27
    vegasfox

    vegasfox GC Hall of Fame

    2,057
    171
    103
    Feb 4, 2024
    What Kamala really wants
     
    • Winner Winner x 1
  8. Sep 10, 2024 #28
    92gator

    92gator GC Hall of Fame

    14,525
    14,451
    3,363
    Jun 14, 2007
    Yep.

    ...and it's not going to bode well for sKamala.

    Honeymoon's ovuh, sweetie...

    It's finna be midnight Cinderella.

    :devil:
     
    • Informative Informative x 1
  9. Sep 10, 2024 #29
    pkaib01

    pkaib01 GC Hall of Fame

    3,814
    808
    2,063
    Apr 3, 2007
    So what is your concern about funding the care?

    Is it that the AMA as affirmed that gender-affirming surgeries can be medically necessary for transgender individuals.

    Or is it that the captors should perform medically necessary to those held in detention and prison?

    Or is it that CNN omitted references to the 'medically necessary' caveat she made at the time?

    Do Russian bots understand gender issues?
     
  10. Sep 10, 2024 #30
    phatGator

    phatGator GC Hall of Fame

    5,687
    5,290
    2,213
    Dec 3, 2007
    Dayton, Ohio
    The thing that gets me is this plan to build 3 million new homes that are affordable to rent or buy. Where is she going to build? In LA, Denver, Austin? Or Klamath Falls, Pueblo, Abilene?

    Will they be built on government land or will the government take private land on which to build them?

    Are they gonna be sold under market value in order to make them affordable? Will there be a lottery to get them?

    I sounds nice but is it really feasible.
     
  11. Sep 10, 2024 #31
    citygator

    citygator VIP Member

    12,035
    2,629
    3,303
    Apr 3, 2007
    Charlotte
    Luckily it is only 4 paragraphs so I can paste it here with a link. Its really more of a partnership with the industry to build the housing we need, both to rent and to buy, and to take down barriers that stand in the way of building new housing, including at the state and local levels.

    Harris-Walz-economic-policy-press-release.pdf (nhc.org)
    • First-Ever Tax Incentive for Building Starter Homes. A HarrisWalz Administration will propose the first-ever tax incentive for homebuilders who build starter homes sold to first-time homebuyers— alleviating the shortage of houses on the market for aspiring homeowners. This would complement the Neighborhood Homes Tax Credit that encourages investment in homes that would otherwise be too costly or difficult to develop or rehabilitate.
    • A Historic Expansion of the Existing Tax Incentive for Businesses That Build Rental Housing that is Affordable.
    • A New Federal Fund To Spur Innovative Housing Construction. A Harris-Walz Administration will propose a new $40 billion innovation fund—doubling down on the $20 billion Biden-Harris Administration’s proposed innovation fund. Like that proposal, it would empower local governments to fund local solutions to build housing. It would also go further to support innovative methods of construction financing, and empower developers and homebuilders to design and build rental and housing solutions that are affordable—with one condition: they must show they will deliver results. This fund will support the expansion of innovative local efforts, like those in Wake County, North Carolina where they are using American Rescue Plan funds to build or preserve 2,400 affordable housing units including a 100-unit development coming online at Kings Ridge and a 176-unit affordable housing development at Tyron Station. Vice President Harris will also take action to make certain federal lands eligible to be repurposed for new housing developments that families can afford.
    • Cut Red Tape and Needless Bureaucracy. These plans will build on the Biden-Harris Administration’s efforts to cut red tape and enable more home building to bring down housing costs—which have advanced record levels of new home construction. Pushing this forward also means streamlining permitting processes and reviews, including for transitoriented and conversion development, so builders can get homes on the market sooner and bring down costs.
     
    • Fistbump/Thanks! Fistbump/Thanks! x 1
  12. Sep 10, 2024 #32
    phatGator

    phatGator GC Hall of Fame

    5,687
    5,290
    2,213
    Dec 3, 2007
    Dayton, Ohio
    Thanks. I’m all for affordable housing, so I hope these things work. There’s still the issue of demand exceeding supply if they are priced under market value, and how to allocate that supply.

    Regardless of whether these are good or bad ideas, it is another example of the somewhat bizarro world we live in, where left is right and right is left. Incentives and tax breaks for homebuilders and cutting red tape and needless bureaucracy used to be Republican ideas. Now they are Democratic ideas. Developers used to be evil, now they’ll be heroes.

    Since most permitting and other issues standing in the way of housing developments are local, it’ll be interesting to see how the federal government can override that.
     
  13. Sep 10, 2024 #33
    gator_jo

    gator_jo GC Hall of Fame

    1,867
    245
    193
    Aug 9, 2024
    Yeah, the Republican ideas now are BSing people and lying. In order to scare up anger and stoke resentment. We've seen it for 8 years now.

    - "I'll build a wall and Mexico will pay for it!! Derrr!!!!!!!!!!!!"
     
    • Agree Agree x 1
Page 2 of 2