I don't pretend to have expertise in football statistics. I really don't understand everything that factors into QBR, but it seems that Napier has a great deal of respect for McCall. With that said, I'd be happy with any of thse guys mentioned in the thread, including Sam Hartman: 3,421 yds (14th) TD's 35 (Tied-5th) INT 11 (Tied-107th) QBR 75.4 (19th)
While strength of schedule is weaker, the talent that McCall was playing with wasn't as strong either.
Let me rephrase that. What I want to know is why does the SOS matter to the QBR? You do know that lesser division QBs have been drafted into the NFL as well and P5 conference QBs that play a tougher SOS. And we know that the best usually play in the P5 conference too. But why should the Strength Of Schedule have anything to do with the QBR?
I don't think it should. 70% completion rating with almost 80 TDs to 8 Ints is great, no matter what level you're playing on, unless he's doing it against little leaguers. My post was in response to someone saying the level of competition he was playing against was less than Spencer's. So, I pointed out that it evens out, since he wasn't playing with the same level of players as Spencer did.
It's funny that they didn't even use their own "passing grade" percentage to choose their best QB. If they did that then McCall would be number one QB on their own list.
I hope it's McCall, but I would not be upset with Pratt. But McCall's stats are the best... if that means much, not way better than Pratt's stats. And I also think that McCall has better wheels too. One more thing, has Pratt even entered the Transfer Portal?
I have a “fortune” from a fortune cookie that’s says “never make the mistake of thinking you know everything about anything”. I keep it at my desk, is really true.
Our hopes to win riding on Fraziars, Kahlil Jackson, Bowman, and Jack Miller delivering is all anybody needs to know about our chances of winning or even competing.