Welcome home, fellow Gator.

The Gator Nation's oldest and most active insider community
Join today!

Gator Basketball defense

Discussion in 'Nuttin but Net' started by gatorrick1, May 1, 2024.

  1. gatorrick1

    gatorrick1 GC Hall of Fame

    1,010
    167
    1,893
    Jul 8, 2007

    I decided to make this it’s own thread as it is interesting and thought some posters would want to participate in the discussion. While I discuss Clayton individually some, the same could be said about our perimeter defense of several players:

    There is alot of nuance to the Clayton defense question. He was a flat out poor defender last year. Knowing Pitino and how he coaches defense he really emphasizes ball pressure and I think Clayton played way too close to the ball handlers often leading to him getting blown by. My guess is at Iona he was superior athletically to guys and was able to hold up pressuring the ball like that. Unfortunately in the SEC not so much. The key to defense if your going to pressure is you must stay what I call connected. Once the offensive player has his shoulders by you the entire defense breaks down. Someone must come help which leaves to rotations and open 3’s, fouls on bigs and open layups.

    In addition, Clayton needs to learn just because the other team is trying to screen you doesn’t mean you have to be screened. The best example of this in college basketball was Shead for Houston. He is soooooo hard to screen and why he was the best perimeter defender in the county last year. With that said this can be it’s own thread cause it’s not just Clayton, it was almost all our perimeter defenders and when you add in the fact we play almost entirely drop coverage you get what we saw. A team that was pretty bad defensively many nights.

    Defenders absolutely have to cut off direct access to the basket. When a player uses a screen you have to stay connected fight to get back to a position putting you between the ball and the basket. The doesn’t mean necessarily in front of the ball. Often times let’s say the ball handler gets a screen going right. The defender has to fight over the screen and then stay between the ball and the hoop. So stay even with the ball and not giving an angle to the hoop.

    This takes tons and tons of practice and demand from the coaches. We stink at it in general. Coach said the other day we didn’t work nearly as much on defense as we did on offense in practice and it really showed. Have to believe that changes this year. Golden said it was intentional as he wanted to play an exciting brand of hoops but he knows what it takes to start winning games in the tourney.

    Also even on my high level travel teams with minimal practice time in comparison to our team, we had several different type of man coverages. Just like in football there are several different man defenses and defensive calls your team can play. I refer to them as having tools in my tool belt. As a coach how I handle ball screens/handoffs is crucial to how good we will be defensively. And every team we play has different strengths.

    Here are just some way to defend ball screens/handoffs. You can switch them, fire them which means try and trap off of them, ice them which is similar to drop coverage, hard hedge them, go under the screen and stay with man, go over the screen and stay with man. There are also several ways to play off the ball, for example I have a call where we don’t leave certain 3 point shooters to help no matter what. Another one where we don’t leave strong side corner shooters. I have a call where we get into passing lanes and another I call paint where most off ball defenders have a foot in the paint.

    As you can see there is a lot a coach can do based on who they are playing. It’s one reason scouting reports are so important. Also in game, if one is not working you can try another or if the other team is in a rhythm you can change defenses and hopefully change the flow.

    I understand our philosophy defensively, I just don’t get why we don’t have more “tools” in our tool belt. Probably the question college coaches ask me the most is how I get my bigs to move their feet so well. It’s because we practice things like firing ball screens which can’t happen without the bigs really moving their feet. And the Gator coaches have so much practice time in comparison.

    I haven’t even mentioned Zone yet, but it absolutely should also be a tool. Just to disrupt a team when they have it going. I also haven’t mentioned presses both man and zone. I used to teach my team the old Billy D press, which was basically full court man disguised as zone press because of the initial set up and trapping first catch. But after the initial trap it was man with emphasis on back tips and back steals in passing lanes.

    I know this is alot but this is where I think Golden could improve the most and have the biggest impact on our team improving next year. While I am excited we got back to the tourney I thought we could have been even better with our personnel had we been more diverse defensively, more willing to change up coverages, more understanding how important it was to keep certain players like Samuel rested enough that he could give full effort.

    By the way I am a Golden fan and think he will just keep getting better as a coach. He is just young. At 50 he will be better than he is today. Just like Billy D improved so will Golden.
     
    Last edited: May 1, 2024
    • Like Like x 1
    • Agree Agree x 1
    • Fistbump/Thanks! Fistbump/Thanks! x 1
    • Wish I would have said that Wish I would have said that x 1
  2. 96Gatorcise

    96Gatorcise GC Hall of Fame

    15,716
    26,019
    3,363
    Aug 6, 2008
    Tampa
    Wrong forum
     
  3. ETGator

    ETGator Long-Time Gator Stuck In East Tennessee Moderator VIP Member

    12,796
    8,065
    3,213
    Sep 15, 2007
    I am sending this to the basketball forum: NBN.
     
  4. gatorrick1

    gatorrick1 GC Hall of Fame

    1,010
    167
    1,893
    Jul 8, 2007
    My bad thanks meant to post in NBN
     
  5. rserina

    rserina GC Hall of Fame

    25,375
    1,118
    1,558
    Apr 3, 2007
    Ringwood, NJ
    This has been Fawcett’s argument. A year ago, we could just run our drop coverage because Castelton was an elite anchor and rim protector. This year, we probably needed to do something different, but, IMO, that’s exactly what happens when you have to have to incorporate 6 new guys into your rotation.

    But I don’t think this is some inveterate problem. Golden’s defense were solid at SF, and really good his first year here.
     
    • Agree Agree x 2
  6. gatorrick1

    gatorrick1 GC Hall of Fame

    1,010
    167
    1,893
    Jul 8, 2007
    While I get this, I don’t agree with Golden either last year or this year. There is no reason why you can’t run multiple coverages. As I said to the best HS coach in our area the other day every coach should have to be a travel coach with high level players for a short period of time. You learn how much you can put in with less than 10 practices. College coaches have soooo much time with their teams. Even with new rosters you can put in alot. I do have many prospective D1 guys and their learning curve is better than that of HS player, so I know what’s possible. I really so believe with the help of a great assistant or with years of learning Golden will manage that time better.
     
  7. rserina

    rserina GC Hall of Fame

    25,375
    1,118
    1,558
    Apr 3, 2007
    Ringwood, NJ
    Conversely, travel coaches don’t prep for opponents at all because you never have film on them, and in tournaments don’t know who you are playing in advance, really.

    Ofc, I coach neither college or travel, so who am I to talk, haha.
     
    • Funny Funny x 1
  8. gatorrick1

    gatorrick1 GC Hall of Fame

    1,010
    167
    1,893
    Jul 8, 2007
    Your right many don’t, but I sure as heck do. Many games are online now and during a tourney you know often who you play next. So you watch those games. When your playing against some of the best players in the country including some of the best shooters you have to know or you’ll get killed.

    More importantly the fact our opponents do scout us and our defensive tendencies is all the more reason you better have some tools in your tool belt. There are ways to attack drop coverage as some schools have shown. You better have some counter punches. There is absolutely no reason we haven’t had more counter punches. Like is ask I do think he will get better this way. At least I hope he does.
     
    • Like Like x 1
  9. akaGatorhoops

    akaGatorhoops GC Columnist VIP Member

    14,402
    2,601
    3,348
    Apr 10, 2007
    This is an excellent post. I share many of your thoughts, and have posted some of the same.
    Having watched nearly all of Clayton’s games at Iona, I will add… he was a subpar defender with the Gaels. And it drove Pitino bonkers.
     
    • Informative Informative x 3
    • Like Like x 1
  10. jmac83

    jmac83 GC Legend

    Apr 9, 2007
    Issues that drove me crazy with the team's defense this season:

    1) The squad-wide tendency to bite at pump fakes, even halfhearted and poor pump fakes.

    2) Interior defenders' inability to guard strong vertically without grabbing the guy's midsection. In the latter part of the year, Condon didn't even try to contest a shot on the strong side, he just stood flatfooted with his arms up because he was so flummoxed about fouling.

    3) Interior defenders surrendering ground. Handlogten was the poster child here but he wasn't alone; late in the season, even guards were driving right into Samuel's chest seemingly without a lot of fear.

    All correctable, but geez you'd like to see guys come into a Power Five program - even the transfers - with better defensive fundamentals.
     
    • Like Like x 2
    • Agree Agree x 1
  11. gatorrick1

    gatorrick1 GC Hall of Fame

    1,010
    167
    1,893
    Jul 8, 2007
    Samuel was a bad defender, and even more so when he was tired. I remember Billy D saying Noah was so special because he played through exhaustion. When he was tried he played even harder. Samuel was so the opposite. When he got tired he just didn’t try. So what already was bad defense by him became horrible.

    I would joke all the time with my friends that Clayton and Samuel were great players if you bet Gator overs lol. Both could score individually and both gave up a ton of points defensively. I thought that was another area Golden can improve. We had the depth to give our post players more rest and we should have. Condon plays so hard he also gets tired. Unlike Samuel he still plays hard when he was tired, but often would get out of position, foul etc cause he was exhausted.
     
    • Like Like x 1
  12. gatorrick1

    gatorrick1 GC Hall of Fame

    1,010
    167
    1,893
    Jul 8, 2007
    One thing I should have added to my original post was that we fouled to much. One reason was we played guys that were tired which always leads to fouls. We have to be better conditioned and sub more frequently.

    But maybe more importantly we have to learn to wall up and tall up better. Walling is taking away an angle to the basket and talling up is when the offensive player does shoot just raising your arms as high as you can without bringing your arms down.

    One of my main teaching points with my team to avoid fouling is that block shots and steals come from help defenders or rotations not from the primary defender on the ball. When someone attacks we should be walling up and talling up making them shoot over us and then letting our rotation guys block shots. Same with steals, we should not be reaching but trying to apply ball pressure so off ball defenders can get into passing lanes and get the steal. All of this takes repetition and lots of practice. Most high school coaches are just bad even though they mean well and most players don’t come in with good defensive habits. It takes time to develop them, but that is what practice is for. It makes tons of sense we didn’t work on our defense much and our defense suffered.
     
    • Agree Agree x 1
    • Winner Winner x 1
  13. murphree_hall

    murphree_hall VIP Member

    9,223
    4,610
    2,898
    Jul 11, 2019
    We should absolutely incorporate zone and presses. That's what other teams did to us and it worked a few times. I think understanding and being able to execute multiple defenses just makes you a more knowledgeable and better overall defender. It also makes you understand how to beat those defenses. A lot of times when I direct my teammates where to go, it's really just lessons learned from high school basketball practices.

    I think defense should always be situational and geared towards your opponent's strengths. Some teams/players can absolutely shred man defense and switching to zone throws them off. Some teams/players can play against zone well but fall apart against man. Sometimes you have good personnel for a 1-3-1. Personally, I hate the 3-2 zone. I'm not sure why, but I feel like it's hard to get right. I like either man, 2-3, or 1-3-1. My absolute favorite is a matchup 2-3 zone, because it combines the elements of the two best defenses (2-3, and man-to-man), IMO.

    Billy D had his players full-court press all the time and I miss it. If you've got the horses, why not?
     
    • Agree Agree x 3
    • Like Like x 1
    • Fistbump/Thanks! Fistbump/Thanks! x 1
    • Winner Winner x 1
  14. ThePlayer

    ThePlayer VIP Member

    37,610
    5,021
    2,193
    Apr 3, 2007
    "In the latter part of the year, Condon didn't even try to contest a shot on the strong side,
    he just stood flatfooted with his arms up because he was so flummoxed about fouling."

    This is exactly why he's a 4 and not a 5 IMO.
    Chinyelu outweighs him by 15-20 pounds and should start at the 5
     
    • Agree Agree x 1
  15. gatorrick1

    gatorrick1 GC Hall of Fame

    1,010
    167
    1,893
    Jul 8, 2007
    I probably play 85% or 90% man, but as I explained that could mean all different types. I also teach my team the Syracuse 2-3 zone. The key to that is when ball goes middle don’t collapse on the ball but instead everyone match up with shooters in your area. It always takes awhile for my guys to get it , but ultimately they do and it’s very effective actually at defending 3’s. We play it very wide and really rely on our 5 to be able to handle matching up man when it does middle. I’m fairness I almost always have a good D1 quality defensive 5.

    I have one kinda half court zone press and then I have my Billy D full court stuff that is basically man with forcing inbounder to pass to corner and guy guarding in bounder trapping first pass. After that initial trap it’s pretty much straight up a man. You do need a good defensive 5 to play it well though. Again I just think we have enough practice time to put it all in and be better at it.


    The last thing is I don’t play these other defenses often or for really long stretches. Just have them in my tool belt in case I need them.

    Golden I hope either hires an assistant to help with this, like Billy D did or learns it himself.
     
    • Like Like x 2
    • Informative Informative x 2
  16. murphree_hall

    murphree_hall VIP Member

    9,223
    4,610
    2,898
    Jul 11, 2019
    I personally don't really have a preference over man or zone. It's really based on personnel. It's amazing how some players/teams are terrific defenders in man but terrible in zone and vice versa. One thing I really like about zone, especially the 2-3... is that it sets you up for the fast break outlet pass if everything goes right. If you have speedy guards and good passing bigs, they guards can even leak out a little bit once the shot goes up in anticipation of the rebound and outlet pass.

    In high school, I had a coach who did something I really liked. We practiced every defense... man, 2-3, 3-2, 1-3-1, and press. After made baskets, he'd sometimes randomly change defenses or let me change them as the point guard whenever I wanted. It was such a great feeling to just switch from 2-3 to 1-3-1, to man in three different possessions and really mess with the other team's flow.
     
    • Like Like x 3
    • Agree Agree x 1
  17. G8rmann

    G8rmann VIP Member

    3,757
    9,548
    2,753
    Feb 20, 2014
    I think you can gain a big advantage in critical points by switching defenses from time to time to shift momentum. Play a few minutes of press? Try a zone when getting beat in paint. Man to man to slow down hot shooting, etc.
     
    • Agree Agree x 3
    • Like Like x 1
  18. rserina

    rserina GC Hall of Fame

    25,375
    1,118
    1,558
    Apr 3, 2007
    Ringwood, NJ
    Yet he had the highest block rate on the team. How does that work out?
     
    • Agree Agree x 2
  19. gatorrick1

    gatorrick1 GC Hall of Fame

    1,010
    167
    1,893
    Jul 8, 2007

    Because of the nuance of each defense and the quality of the offensive players in college you can not play good defense playing every kind of defense. I also believe there is no better defense than man because of the versatility overall. However I do think it’s possible to be a really good man team who has a couple other defenses that you are adequate at to change up the flow of the other team if needed. Or if you want to try and create offense from defense having a press you do can help as well. In general though I have never seen a team that is good at man and several different types of zone. Just not enough practice time to be great at everything.

    We saw first hand though how other teams used a zone against us to win games or make them closer. We should absolutely be able to do that in small spurts when needed.
     
    • Like Like x 1
    • Winner Winner x 1
  20. gatorrick1

    gatorrick1 GC Hall of Fame

    1,010
    167
    1,893
    Jul 8, 2007
    Condon has the ability to be a good defender. He has a great body in terms of projecting strength and that is huge for post players like him. It’s huge because as he learns to wall up and tall up better, players will have no choice but to try and create space by banging into him and if he doesn’t move he will block shots without even leaving his feet. The potential is there. Haugh with his build and length as well. Both those dudes have the potential to be really good two way players.
     
    Last edited: May 3, 2024