Garland doesn’t rule out indicting Trump

Trump did “nothing more” than prior losers? I’m sure you can show us the outgoing prior president who organized a mob on the way out the door. Yep, that definitely happened. I’m sure prior Presidents were deep into calling state Secretaries of State to “find” them votes or just “declare” that they won. So patriotic.

 

The feds have worldwide jurisdiction. If you commit crimes against US statutes, where you are standing is immaterial. I don’t believe he was in Georgia when he made those calls, but it really doesn’t matter.

 

I just love satire and dark humor. (You are joking, no? If not, there’s really no need or excuse for such a hateful post.)

 

Case in point: The New York AG refused to charge the knife wielding assailant who tried to murder the republican candidate for governor, Lee Zeldin, yet the DOJ stepped in and charged him under federal law. Zeldin stated his first official action if he wins the election will be to fire the AG who refused to charge the attempted murderer.

 

Welp, I guess you weren’t joking. I see now that you’re too angry to have humor.

BTW: there’s a vast difference between attacking one man and attacking an entire political party.

 

There is no need or excuse for making a snowflake comment just because we disagree.

 

How do you know they don’t? Are you honestly defending what Trump did before and during January 6?

 

Why would you think I'm not serious? I'm far from angry. I'm exceedingly overjoyed to see the results in just 18 months of everything you voted for being produced by the worst presidential administration in history along with the help of the democratic controlled congress. It just so happens it is your party that created this mess. For that, I'm more than willing to share the good news of the failure.

Since this administration is intent to go down with their climate cultist and globalist views, that is on your party, the entire party.

 

It’s not a matter of disagreement. Your posts in this thread are the most outrageous I’ve seen on TH in some time. There’s zero purpose behind them other than to mock and antagonize. That suggests to me you have some serious issues.

 

Watch yourself, they're all about to block you!

 

Most outrageous posts you’ve seen?
Dude, your fellow left wingers have put out some serious doozies. You guys keep saying everything is a threat to our democracy…I mean almost all of citygators posts are straight msnbc hyperbolic garbage.
Too many to name.

 

You haven't seen anything yet. My purpose here is to share all of the good news one post and one thread at a time. That you disagree with my views is irrelevant to me.

I figured a conservative here would be called all of the things you are calling me. I simply refer you back to my two rules posted above. They exist for people like you.

 

Like I said in the Coronavirus thread, the radicalized right wing thinks it is the voice of reason. Makes them dangerous.

 

Your tactic typically fails here. There are plenty of threads on the diverse topics you keep raising. Your intent is to post whataboutisms in all of the threads that interest you. My suggestion to all is to ignore the whataboutisms and stick to the topic. If the poster posts subjects addressing the topic in appropriate threads, then engage.

 

I've posted nothing that isn't within the rules of the board. I read the rules. Free speech is allowed.

This poster has done nothing more than to attack me instead of rebutting my views. Why would I be banned over his/her insecurities?

 

As @lacuna pointes out, your rules are flawed and rejected. And, there is nothing “conservative” about you.

 

From my side of the street, the radicalized left is not a voice of reason and is in fact dangerous.

 

Thanks for sharing. (LOL)

 

I'm entitled to express myself and especially so based on the topic and then what follows. I promise I will read and respond when you address me directly. BTW, whataboutisms are in the eye of the beholder. What you really mean to say is I cannot disagree with your views on any topic.

 

Ok boomer. He wasn't talking about you getting banned. 'Blocked' and banned are 2 different things.