Free Adnan!

Sarah Koenig dropped an updated episode. I would recommend a listen. Notes in the file discovered under a review show a lot of misconduct by prosecutors. Best to listed for yourself

 

Yes. Same. If you subscribed, it will pop into your feed. That's how I found it

 

It did. But it just traveled on Susan Simpson's work. She did so much of the work

 

Hard to know without seeing it exactly. But in my opinion, and of course I am influenced by the fact that I followed the undisclosed podcast which covered at length the unreliability of the evidence, it conclusively undermines evidence of guilt.

At the 50,000 foot level, Jay Wilds' testimony was completely unreliable. They had part of what made unreliable. The prosecution even acknowledged that it was unreliable and changed a lot but said that it was supported by the cell phone evidence. But the cell phone evidence did not support his testimony, Which was plainly coached and fabricated by the detectives as they showed on undisclosed by going in the original audio recordings of his interviews, which was plainly coached and fabricated by the detectives as they showed on undisclosed by going in the original audio recordings of his interviews. The detectives turned off the tape at the beginning and after he would give certain answers and then he would come back on and correct what he had just said. Sometimes you could hear them tapping pointing to something on the table.

Part of what the prosecution hid from the defense was a disclaimer sheet from AT&T in response to the subpoena that disclosed about the unreliability of the very specific records that they were using for determining location. The sheet said that the records could not be used for that fir technical reasons about the way their phones acquired towers. It was a cover sheet to the subpoena response. The prosecutors affirmatively removed it when they turned it over. Susan Simpson figured it out because of the fax legend the top showed that there was a sheet missing and then she founded in a separate file. The expert that they had testify said that he was not aware of that and he would not of testified as he did had he known.

There were a ton of other reasons to conclude logically that he could not be guilty. It was about a 10 hour podcast altogether. But just that should've been enough. It was what the prosecution said was their primary evidence, and they knew that it did not show what they said it showed.In fact, their expert witness did a drive around with certain equipment that I don't recall the specifics of and got different results and the prosecutors persuaded him that he must be wrong because of the AT&T records.

But what was new to the motion is the fact that they had two other solid suspects that were not investigated despite having motive, opportunity, etc. So take from that what you will.

 

Not a chance

 

Not based upon the evidence. I agree his status makes him a likely suspect. That fact standing alone would certainly make it possible, maybe even probable. But not want to look at the evidence once the evidence is looked at with any type of objectivity

 

Jay did not know where the car was. That was like him the police, as were details about the burial site. That's part of what the other podcasters showed. I can't recommend season one of Undisclosed enough

 

Yes that was the evidence given to the jury. The police basically gave Jay almost every aspect of his story. As Susan Simpson showed, they would give him one version, and then give him an updated version as they discovered other evidence that contradicted the prior version