Welcome home, fellow Gator.

The Gator Nation's oldest and most active insider community
Join today!
  1. Hi there... Can you please quickly check to make sure your email address is up to date here? Just in case we need to reach out to you or you lose your password. Muchero thanks!

First Plug and Play Nuclear plant approved

Discussion in 'Too Hot for Swamp Gas' started by G8trGr8t, Aug 2, 2022.

  1. G8trGr8t

    G8trGr8t Premium Member

    32,401
    12,159
    3,693
    Aug 26, 2008
    Long past due but glad to see it

    First Small Nuclear Reactor Greenlit By US Regulators

    A
    small nuclear reactor has been approved for certification by the US Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) on Friday, which could make it the first of its kind to be approved in the United States.

    It's been a long time coming. The certification process kicked off all the way back in 2016 and its design was approved two years ago by the NRC.
    The small modular reactor (SMR), designed by Oregon-based nuclear reactor company NuScale Power, can be mass produced in a central factory and shipped to wherever they’re needed — which is both cheaper and less time-consuming than designing a custom nuclear reactor for each location.
    At 65 feet tall and nine feet in diameter, the reactor is indeed pretty small — for a reactor, anyway — capable of outputting some 77 megawatt electrical units of power.
    In fact, up to 12 of these bad boys can be chained together in a standard power plant configuration to produce a total of 924 MWe, according the World Nuclear Association, which puts it about on par with the average nuclear power plant.
     
    • Winner Winner x 4
    • Informative Informative x 2
  2. tampagtr

    tampagtr VIP Member

    17,612
    2,861
    1,618
    Apr 3, 2007
    Very interesting
     
    • Agree Agree x 1
  3. citygator

    citygator VIP Member

    12,026
    2,627
    3,303
    Apr 3, 2007
    Charlotte
    “Energy Biden” with another win!

    Kidding. Looks like it’s operational in 2029 but the article doesn’t really explain what “approved for certification” means or how many hurdles are left.

    Seems prudent as gas will be $15 by then.
     
  4. G8trGr8t

    G8trGr8t Premium Member

    32,401
    12,159
    3,693
    Aug 26, 2008
    Built uniformly in a factory and shipped to the site. Spread them around and reduce the need for additional power lines and increase efficiency of grid as you lose less power by reducing the distances the power has to be transmitted.
     
    • Like Like x 2
    • Winner Winner x 1
    • Informative Informative x 1
  5. G8trGr8t

    G8trGr8t Premium Member

    32,401
    12,159
    3,693
    Aug 26, 2008
    Technology | NuScale Power

    FEATURES OF THE NUSCALE POWER MODULE
    • No AC or DC power for safe shutdown and cooling: Modules safely shut down and self-cool, indefinitely, with no need for AC or DC power, operator or computer action, or additional water. This provides what is called an unlimited coping period—a first for light water reactor technology.
    • Helical Coil Steam Generators (HCSG): The use of compact HCSGs provides a large heat transfer surface area in a small volume. The HCSG geometry has a very low pressure drop that serves to maximize natural circulation flow in the primary loop. The once-through counter-flow design enables the generation of superheated steam and good thermal efficiency using natural circulation flow.
    • High strength steel containment immersed in the cooling pool: Acts as a heat exchanger to provide the means to transfer reactor heat to the reactor pool water to limit containment pressure, eliminating the requirement for containment spray systems for cooling. The containment vessel is submerged in the reactor pool, which provides a passive heat sink for heat removal under loss-of-coolant accident (LOCA) conditions.
    • Maintaining containment in a vacuum limits heat exchange during normal operation: Minimizes reactor vessel heat loss, limits oxygen content, prevents component corrosion and eliminates the requirement for physical reactor vessel insulation.
    • Small, efficient core design limits source term: Our NuScale Power Module™ has 1/20 of the nuclear fuel of a large-scale reactor. Its small decay heat, inherent stability, and reactor physics eliminates fuel damage in all postulated design basis events, including those with failure of all control rods to insert. For postulated beyond design basis events, radiation from fuel damage is well below regulatory limits at the plant site boundary.
    • Digital Instrumentation & Control (I&C): NuScale’s proprietary field programmable gate array digital I&C system provides comprehensive monitoring and control of all plant systems in a single control room. Control room layout and panel displays were designed using a state-of-the-art simulator and a comprehensive human factors engineering and human system interface evaluation program.
    [​IMG]
     
    • Informative Informative x 2
    • Best Post Ever Best Post Ever x 1
  6. dave_the_thinker

    dave_the_thinker VIP Member

    1,086
    431
    1,813
    Dec 1, 2019
    Milton, FL
    First commercially approved small-scale nuclear reactor in the US.

    The Navy puts these out all of the time, and we have them onboard plenty of satellites.
     
    • Informative Informative x 2
    • Agree Agree x 1
  7. G8trGr8t

    G8trGr8t Premium Member

    32,401
    12,159
    3,693
    Aug 26, 2008
    I have always wondered why we can power a nuclear aircraft carrier with one but we can't power communities with that same reactor. These are way past due. China has multiples under construction already
     
    • Agree Agree x 3
  8. Tjgators

    Tjgators Premium Member

    5,110
    639
    358
    Apr 3, 2007
    Nuclear is the way.
     
    • Agree Agree x 2
  9. DesertGator

    DesertGator VIP Member

    4,525
    2,341
    2,013
    Apr 10, 2007
    Frisco, TX
    I agree, but it's also going to be a matter of changing the public opinion on nuclear. If these can be dropped pretty much anywhere, the applications are limitless (e.g., the needed infrastructure for "fast" EV charging stations). However, they need to further investigate the results of "catastrophic events" associated with them (e.g., California earthquakes) and be able to assure John Q. Public that their neighborhood isn't going to turn into something out of a Cronenberg film.
     
    • Agree Agree x 1
  10. OklahomaGator

    OklahomaGator Jedi Administrator Moderator VIP Member

    124,014
    164,188
    116,973
    Apr 3, 2007
    Good stuff.
     
  11. littlebluelw

    littlebluelw GC Hall of Fame

    6,334
    825
    2,068
    Apr 3, 2007
    Makes a lot of sense. I picked up 100 shares.
     
  12. G8trGr8t

    G8trGr8t Premium Member

    32,401
    12,159
    3,693
    Aug 26, 2008
    Provided it is done safely
     
  13. G8trGr8t

    G8trGr8t Premium Member

    32,401
    12,159
    3,693
    Aug 26, 2008
    Worldwide market when you can plug and play. Operators and security would seem to be obvious limitations but life in islands should change. Hawaii, USVI, Puerto Rico should have orders in already. Great carbon reduction, tremendously cheaper than current baseload energy costs. These, or similar, should put coal out of business. Not sure if there will be export restrictions on these. I'm sure Europe would love to have a few bout now.
     
  14. thomadm

    thomadm VIP Member

    2,968
    708
    2,088
    Apr 9, 2007
    That has been overblown since Chernobyl, which was an awful design and had obsolete controls compared to today. The West has been decommissioning them since the 90s in favor of NG. Nuclear is really the way to go long term. Its bigger cousin, Fusion reactors will be our future anyway.
     
    • Agree Agree x 1
  15. G8trGr8t

    G8trGr8t Premium Member

    32,401
    12,159
    3,693
    Aug 26, 2008
    When I say safely, I am referring to security of the material that could cause problems un the wrong hands or network isolation to prevent hacking. The engineering isnt in question, just the operations
     
    • Informative Informative x 1
  16. mdgator05

    mdgator05 Premium Member

    16,244
    2,096
    1,718
    Dec 9, 2010
    You realize that there was another major nuclear disaster since then right? Regardless, nuclear is not financially feasible on a large scale due to the massive fixed costs (which also cause technological lock-in, not something companies want when you have new technology that is getting cheaper and cheaper (and is already cheaper than Nuclear)). We will see if the small scale plants can solve this issue. I am not opposed to the notion of nuclear, but it has to make business sense. Large scale nuclear simply doesn't.
     
    • Agree Agree x 1
  17. G8trGr8t

    G8trGr8t Premium Member

    32,401
    12,159
    3,693
    Aug 26, 2008
    Why no floating nuclear plants offshore from major population centers? Helps solve the separation and a big part of the security issue. If we can float and stabilize a monster windmill farm we should be able to lock one of these and a desal plant big enough to cool it offshore
     
  18. mdgator05

    mdgator05 Premium Member

    16,244
    2,096
    1,718
    Dec 9, 2010
    Because if a wind farm is destroyed by a huge wave, you don't get this:

    Fukushima nuclear disaster - Wikipedia
     
  19. G8trGr8t

    G8trGr8t Premium Member

    32,401
    12,159
    3,693
    Aug 26, 2008
    This is a totally different animal wrt the facility
     
  20. mdgator05

    mdgator05 Premium Member

    16,244
    2,096
    1,718
    Dec 9, 2010
    Nuclear is always going to have higher risk profiles due to the cost of failure compared to something like solar or wind.
     
    • Agree Agree x 1