Lawyers…. Seen anything like this before? The synopsis: Two idiots were training and attending protests for the express purpose of starting fights to assault Leftists. The Government charged them under the Anti-Rioting act. The two morons' lawyer claimed in a motion that it was unfair because that law was totally unconstitutional. A Bush appointed Judge (Carney) agreed and dismissed the charges. The Appeals Court overturned his decision and ordered the charges reinstated. The two idiots are re-arrested and subsequently file a motion that sounds like it was written by Twitter. It isn’t fair that they are charged with a crime when the Leftists aren’t charged with crimes which compels Judge Carney to dismiss the charges. Again. The Prosecutors rushed to the Appeals Court as Carney again ordered the release of the two defendants. The Appeals Court, issued an order putting the whole thing on hold while they hear the arguments. Including the release. And to make sure Judge Carney didn’t release them again issued an order that nobody could release these two until the Appeals Court decided what the hell was going on. A highly unusual ruling to dismiss a case against 2 White nationalists is put on hold by a federal appeals court | CNN After a federal judge made the rare decision to dismiss a criminal case against two White nationalists suspected of inciting violence at political rallies, an appeals court on Thursday put the ruling on hold and one of the men was re-arrested. amp.cnn.com And even more information at this link. Charges against alleged white supremacists are tossed by a California judge for the second time LOS ANGELES (AP) — For the second time in five years, federal charges against alleged members of a violent white supremacist group accused of inciting violence at California political rallies were dismissed by a federal judge who found they were selectively prosecuted.
Interesting. I'd be interested in knowing on what grounds the charges were dismissed. Surely it's not the constitutionally of the Anti-Rioting Act.