Welcome home, fellow Gator.

The Gator Nation's oldest and most active insider community
Join today!

FBI Executed a Warrant at Mar a Lago; the Investigation Continues

Discussion in 'Too Hot for Swamp Gas' started by duchen, Aug 8, 2022.

  1. jjgator55

    jjgator55 VIP Member

    6,198
    1,765
    2,043
    Apr 3, 2007
    You’re right. Apparently the FBI notified the secret service three hours they were coming. Hardly a raid.
     
    • Informative Informative x 3
    • Like Like x 1
  2. rtgator

    rtgator Premium Member

    6,996
    789
    458
    Apr 3, 2007
    Why on earth would Trump nominate a "never-Trumper" to be head of the FBI? Are you saying Trump is stupid?
     
    • Like Like x 2
    • Fistbump/Thanks! Fistbump/Thanks! x 2
    • Winner Winner x 2
    • Funny Funny x 1
  3. WC53

    WC53 GC Hall of Fame

    4,548
    969
    2,088
    Oct 17, 2015
    Old City
    If it is about docs, they will never bring a charge. Just recover and move on.

    That this was done very quietly until his tweet is telling. Probably had one of his lawyers there with them. Curious about the safe. Didn’t Trump’s statement have a question mark or was that added after by media?
     
    • Agree Agree x 2
  4. Gatorrick22

    Gatorrick22 GC Hall of Fame

    87,208
    26,111
    4,613
    Apr 3, 2007
    No proof that he took anything that did NOT legally belong to him... It's a fishing expedition...
     
    • Funny Funny x 1
  5. G8trGr8t

    G8trGr8t Premium Member

    30,772
    11,868
    3,693
    Aug 26, 2008
    no, the DC criminals were content to trade power while both engorging themselves. An outside force ahs turned the criminals in DC against each other in a tribal manner never seen before in our history. That weakens us as a country and strengthens our enemies as they fill the voids we leave behind while we fight amongst ourselves. This is exactly what Putin wanted when Hillary questioned the legitimacy of his election, to disrupt the fundamental bedrock of our democracy, the confidence in our elections.
     
    • Like Like x 1
    • Winner Winner x 1
  6. mrhansduck

    mrhansduck GC Hall of Fame

    4,608
    971
    1,788
    Nov 23, 2021
    If this turns out to be a partisan fishing expedition with nothing credible behind it, Trump *would* benefit from that IMO. Which is one more reason I hope and presume they wouldn't request and execute a search warrant casually and without thinking it through. Those of us who don't like Trump should wait and see what we learn and how it plays out, though many won't be happy unless there's an indictment. Conversely, most of the people who are already declaring that it's just a witch hunt and getting up in arms despite not having the details are probably not going to change their minds regardless of what comes out going forward.
     
    • Like Like x 1
    • Agree Agree x 1
    • Winner Winner x 1
  7. rtgator

    rtgator Premium Member

    6,996
    789
    458
    Apr 3, 2007
    In that case, Trump should be dismissed. :)

    FB_IMG_1630435900121.jpg
     
    Last edited: Aug 10, 2022
  8. Trickster

    Trickster VIP Member

    9,698
    2,374
    3,233
    Sep 20, 2014
    You’re right to an extent, but from what I’ve read, some of the records he’s refused to turn over are ultra sensitive and bear on our nation’s security. He’s been repeatedly asked to turn them over. Is it your position, then, that the country should just say, “okay, keep them”?

    Your remark about Garland is way off base. He’s been extremely cautious and reluctant to go after a former president. Trump has left him only one other choice - do nothing. Do you honestly think the DOJ would seek a search warrant, and a federal judge would grant it, if this were merely a nothing burger and political stunt? Representatives from two of our three branches deemed the search essential.
     
    • Fistbump/Thanks! Fistbump/Thanks! x 3
    • Informative Informative x 1
  9. ursidman

    ursidman VIP Member

    13,757
    22,534
    3,348
    Sep 27, 2007
    Bug Tussle NC
    No, there is a lot of proof and also a near confession when trump returned much of the stolen material (but apparently kept some).
     
  10. Trickster

    Trickster VIP Member

    9,698
    2,374
    3,233
    Sep 20, 2014
    A come on man???? No explanation for it. Just unbelievable!
     
    • Come On Man Come On Man x 1
  11. WC53

    WC53 GC Hall of Fame

    4,548
    969
    2,088
    Oct 17, 2015
    Old City
    And the fact this his Atty was in negotiations to return them for a year? The documents don’t belong to the President, but the White House.

    What happens when you elect a child
     
    • Winner Winner x 4
    • Agree Agree x 1
    • Fistbump/Thanks! Fistbump/Thanks! x 1
  12. jjgator55

    jjgator55 VIP Member

    6,198
    1,765
    2,043
    Apr 3, 2007
    As I said earlier this is not a deflection that serves them well for the mid-terms. They don’t want to make the mid-terms to be about Trump, but like an oozing pimple on prom night there he is. So now their main issue, inflation, is taking a back seat.
     
    • Winner Winner x 2
    • Disagree Bacon! Disagree Bacon! x 1
  13. DesertGator

    DesertGator VIP Member

    4,509
    2,339
    2,013
    Apr 10, 2007
    Frisco, TX
    I don't disagree with the effect, but I think you're giving Putin too much credit and Hillary too little here. She may be a power-hungry sleezebag, but she's not stupid by any stretch. He's crazy like a fox, but I don't think he wields that kind of influence (maybe I'm naïve on that count, wouldn't be the first time).
     
    • Agree Agree x 1
  14. ETGator1

    ETGator1 GC Hall of Fame

    15,714
    1,726
    708
    Apr 3, 2007
    No, you can't.
     
  15. PITBOSS

    PITBOSS GC Hall of Fame

    7,422
    747
    558
    Apr 13, 2007
    Has anything been mentioned? Fbi doesn’t prove its case to the press during a raid or right after. At this point we don’t know.
     
    • Agree Agree x 1
  16. philnotfil

    philnotfil GC Hall of Fame

    17,552
    1,738
    1,718
    Apr 8, 2007
    The really wild thing is he probably believes that.
     
    • Agree Agree x 2
  17. Trickster

    Trickster VIP Member

    9,698
    2,374
    3,233
    Sep 20, 2014
    Another one! Wow, a high level of intelligence on display here.
     
    • Like Like x 1
  18. rtgator

    rtgator Premium Member

    6,996
    789
    458
    Apr 3, 2007
    Recap . . . .

    Closed mind.

    Enemies list for all who disagree.
     
    • Like Like x 2
    • Winner Winner x 1
  19. PITBOSS

    PITBOSS GC Hall of Fame

    7,422
    747
    558
    Apr 13, 2007
    Interesting in a post from Dear Leader on “Truth”, for some reason he mentions HRC took antique furniture out of the White House. Seems like a odd thing to bring up from 22 yrs ago out of the blue.
     
  20. GatorBen

    GatorBen Premium Member

    6,089
    962
    2,968
    Apr 9, 2007
    Technically a magistrate isn’t an Article III judge.

    He almost certainly has at least some papers that are at least technically federal rather than personal records. The challenge is that all former presidents almost certainly do as well unless they literally walked out of the office and took nothing other than a calendar of campaign events with them.

    I’m staying out of this one until more facts come out, but in the abstract if it winds up being nothing more than “we used a police raid to recover archival records,” that would not be a great look for DOJ.
     
    • Agree Agree x 5
    • Fistbump/Thanks! Fistbump/Thanks! x 1
    • Winner Winner x 1
    • Best Post Ever Best Post Ever x 1