Welcome home, fellow Gator.

The Gator Nation's oldest and most active insider community
Join today!

FBI Executed a Warrant at Mar a Lago; the Investigation Continues

Discussion in 'Too Hot for Swamp Gas' started by duchen, Aug 8, 2022.

  1. pkaib01

    pkaib01 GC Hall of Fame

    3,509
    746
    2,063
    Apr 3, 2007
    FBI founded

    If you want to start an FBI is evil thread, feel free. Don't take a dump here.
     
    • Funny Funny x 1
    • Optimistic Optimistic x 1
  2. pkaib01

    pkaib01 GC Hall of Fame

    3,509
    746
    2,063
    Apr 3, 2007
    I have a sad that more people don't find these hilarious. OMG

     
    • Funny Funny x 3
  3. channingcrowderhungry

    channingcrowderhungry Premium Member

    8,606
    1,913
    3,013
    Apr 3, 2007
    Bottom of a pint glass
    It's nice to see someone with authority challenge his constant stream of bullshit. If someone had checked his nonsense in 2016 we wouldn't be here.
     
    • Winner Winner x 6
    • Agree Agree x 2
    • Fistbump/Thanks! Fistbump/Thanks! x 1
  4. G8trGr8t

    G8trGr8t Premium Member

    30,752
    11,853
    3,693
    Aug 26, 2008
    it's like for the first time in his life someone told him no and he has no basis of understanding as to how to deal with that word.
     
    • Winner Winner x 4
    • Fistbump/Thanks! Fistbump/Thanks! x 1
  5. sierragator

    sierragator GC Hall of Fame

    15,086
    13,174
    1,853
    Apr 8, 2007
    Like any other spoiled three year old: with a tantrum
     
    • Agree Agree x 2
  6. gatorchamps960608

    gatorchamps960608 GC Hall of Fame

    4,160
    876
    2,463
    Jul 4, 2020
    Yeah but the not-likeable lady had 3 bad emails, so same.
     
  7. BossaGator

    BossaGator GC Hall of Fame

    4,513
    185
    203
    Apr 10, 2007
    Arlington, VA
    Eleventh Circuit takes out the trash. I can’t help but think Judge Cannon is feeling a bit hot around her ears.
     
    • Agree Agree x 3
    • Optimistic Optimistic x 1
  8. duchen

    duchen VIP Member

    13,773
    5,153
    3,208
    Nov 25, 2017
    Shocked face. The fact that the DOJ didn’t ask for more just shows the favor of the powerful. But, the DOJ doesn’t care about the non-classified documents which are apparently not germane to this investigation. Other than they belong to the national archives. The obvious and correct result. Looking forward to reading the opinion
     
    • Agree Agree x 1
  9. gatorchamps960608

    gatorchamps960608 GC Hall of Fame

    4,160
    876
    2,463
    Jul 4, 2020
    Wish they had appealed her whole BS order.
     
    • Agree Agree x 3
  10. duchen

    duchen VIP Member

    13,773
    5,153
    3,208
    Nov 25, 2017
    At least what I can see in the excerpts on line, the court emphasized that it was only assessing the narrow issue of the classified documents the government appealed. That is said because it sends the message that the failure to addrsss other aspects of Judge Cannon’s order is not an affirmation if the order. Two Trump appointed judges in the panel.
     
  11. G8trGr8t

    G8trGr8t Premium Member

    30,752
    11,853
    3,693
    Aug 26, 2008
    Isnt that all the DOJ asked for?

    Papa said "the purty gurl aint going to ask you to kiss her." DOJ specifically limited to be able to complete the damage assesment ASAP. Now that it is over, they need to appeal each and every document that belongs to the archive. I suspect that hair will be left to split by the special master and the DOJ is fine with that as he isn't in the cult.
     
  12. pkaib01

    pkaib01 GC Hall of Fame

    3,509
    746
    2,063
    Apr 3, 2007
    I read the ruling. The court essentially said that Cannon was wrong on every factor of each test (Richey and Nken). It was a real slamming of Cannon's judgement.

    Order is restored for the time being.
     
    • Agree Agree x 3
    • Informative Informative x 2
    • Like Like x 1
  13. gator_lawyer

    gator_lawyer VIP Member

    16,043
    5,554
    3,213
    Oct 30, 2017
    Don't worry, if Trump becomes President again, he'll reward Cannon for her loyalty.
     
    • Agree Agree x 2
  14. Norcaligator

    Norcaligator GC Hall of Fame

    1,111
    140
    288
    Sep 21, 2007
    • Fistbump/Thanks! Fistbump/Thanks! x 2
    • Informative Informative x 2
  15. PITBOSS

    PITBOSS GC Hall of Fame

    7,421
    747
    558
    Apr 13, 2007
    “TwoTrump appointed judges in the panel.”

    that’s encouraging. ours courts might be the last bastion for justice and our democracy.
     
    • Agree Agree x 1
  16. duchen

    duchen VIP Member

    13,773
    5,153
    3,208
    Nov 25, 2017
    You can read the ruling an apply the test to the non-classified documents and see that the result would be the same.
     
    • Like Like x 1
    • Agree Agree x 1
  17. BigCypressGator1981

    BigCypressGator1981 GC Hall of Fame

    6,469
    1,327
    3,103
    Oct 11, 2011
    [​IMG]
     
    • Funny Funny x 1
  18. StrangeGator

    StrangeGator VIP Member

    29,703
    2,030
    1,578
    Apr 3, 2007
    Chicago
    Trump will never be elected again. I almost wish he would be acquitted on every charge so he could be beaten soundly by Biden, Newsom, Shapiro or anyone else, including Elmo.
     
    • Optimistic Optimistic x 1
  19. Norcaligator

    Norcaligator GC Hall of Fame

    1,111
    140
    288
    Sep 21, 2007
    Some key quotes from the Opinion:

    "For our part, we cannot discern why Plaintiff would have an individual interest in or need for any of the one-hundred documents with classification markings…."

    "Plaintiff has not even attempted to show that he has a need to know the information contained in the classified documents. Nor has he established that the current administration has waived that requirement for these documents."

    “Plaintiff does not have a possessory interest in the documents at issue, so he does not suffer a cognizable harm if the United States reviews documents he neither owns nor has a personal interest in. Second, we find unpersuasive Plaintiff’s insistence that he would be harmed by a criminal investigation.”

    "In sum, given the long-recognized 'compelling interest in protecting . . . the secrecy of information important to our national security,' we conclude that the United States would suffer irreparable harm from the district court’s restrictions."
     
    • Like Like x 3
    • Informative Informative x 3