Welcome home, fellow Gator.

The Gator Nation's oldest and most active insider community
Join today!

Draft Alito opinion leaked overturning Roe

Discussion in 'Too Hot for Swamp Gas' started by tampagtr, May 2, 2022.

  1. tampagtr

    tampagtr VIP Member

    17,522
    2,765
    1,618
    Apr 3, 2007
    Yep. But that’s not who is in their mind’s eye when they dream of enforcing. It’s Lena Dunham and all those young single professional urban women on TV that joke disparagingly about men
     
    • Fistbump/Thanks! Fistbump/Thanks! x 1
  2. gogator7444

    gogator7444 GC Hall of Fame

    3,051
    939
    1,858
    Nov 24, 2021
    Buffalo NY
     
  3. gogator7444

    gogator7444 GC Hall of Fame

    3,051
    939
    1,858
    Nov 24, 2021
    Buffalo NY
    Oh you bet they'd object to it then!
     
  4. gogator7444

    gogator7444 GC Hall of Fame

    3,051
    939
    1,858
    Nov 24, 2021
    Buffalo NY
    Yep. If they do this it'll be like prohibition where they realized years later the damage being done to society, the economy, etc, then repealed prohibition. Problem is how many women will suffer/die needlessly over it. Not that some care about that part though.

     
  5. BigCypressGator1981

    BigCypressGator1981 GC Hall of Fame

    6,588
    1,350
    3,103
    Oct 11, 2011
    Seems inevitable at this point. The supreme court has officially lost its non-partisan status.
     
    • Agree Agree x 1
  6. docspor

    docspor GC Hall of Fame

    5,549
    1,777
    3,078
    Nov 30, 2010
    Prohibition is the key word. There are lots of things - abortion included - that I am not a fan of, but I am most certainly not for prohibition as a "solution". I am almost never in favor of prohibition. It's lazy, dumb, usually counter productive & certainly anti freedom.
     
  7. docspor

    docspor GC Hall of Fame

    5,549
    1,777
    3,078
    Nov 30, 2010
    the big gov loving pubs will scream about states rights until they get a majority. they no more care about states rights than they do any form of limited gov. They HAVE scrapped limited gov & they will scrap democracy if they have to if it does not give them the control over people that they want. ends justify the means
     
    • Agree Agree x 4
    • Winner Winner x 1
  8. sierragator

    sierragator GC Hall of Fame

    15,143
    13,182
    1,853
    Apr 8, 2007
    Yep, it has been reduced to an instrument of maga world.
     
    • Agree Agree x 1
  9. BigCypressGator1981

    BigCypressGator1981 GC Hall of Fame

    6,588
    1,350
    3,103
    Oct 11, 2011
    Agreed.

    They used to be the party of 'family values'. LOL
    They used to be the party of 'limited government'. LOL

    Its becoming increasingly clear that the only thing they all share in common is being disgruntled, scared white people.
     
    • Agree Agree x 1
    • Winner Winner x 1
  10. sierragator

    sierragator GC Hall of Fame

    15,143
    13,182
    1,853
    Apr 8, 2007
    who want power (end justifies the means)
     
    • Winner Winner x 2
  11. gogator7444

    gogator7444 GC Hall of Fame

    3,051
    939
    1,858
    Nov 24, 2021
    Buffalo NY
     
  12. gogator7444

    gogator7444 GC Hall of Fame

    3,051
    939
    1,858
    Nov 24, 2021
    Buffalo NY
     
    • Agree Agree x 1
    • Winner Winner x 1
  13. gogator7444

    gogator7444 GC Hall of Fame

    3,051
    939
    1,858
    Nov 24, 2021
    Buffalo NY
    Yep. This is going to cost businesses employees/future employees. I mean not those that want to live in the 1850s or the kind of folks that believe women should be seen and not heard and shouldn't have rights, of course. But it will definitely make people especially women think twice about accepting jobs in dangerous states.

    If it was me and it affected me? I'd quit & move. With all the jobs available I'd literally move ASAP. I wouldn't put my health & safety on the line like that.
     
  14. gogator7444

    gogator7444 GC Hall of Fame

    3,051
    939
    1,858
    Nov 24, 2021
    Buffalo NY
    From a newspaper.
    FS-89LVUsAEnc4A.jpeg
     
    • Agree Agree x 1
  15. tampagtr

    tampagtr VIP Member

    17,522
    2,765
    1,618
    Apr 3, 2007
    I'm going to disagree a bit. In some instances, I don't think their measures are rationally calculated to maximize power but merely to harm their political adversaries. That seems to be the end more so than the acquisition of power
     
    • Agree Agree x 1
    • Winner Winner x 1
  16. tampagtr

    tampagtr VIP Member

    17,522
    2,765
    1,618
    Apr 3, 2007
    Paternity support obligations already exist under law. It's just a problem with enforceability, especially if the father does not have demonstrable resources to support. And of course, financial support alone does not equal the burden of carrying a pregnancy to term and raising the child. Not even close.
     
    • Agree Agree x 1
  17. gator_lawyer

    gator_lawyer VIP Member

    16,370
    5,614
    3,213
    Oct 30, 2017
    Doctors in Alabama Already Turn Away Miscarrying Patients. This Will Be Our New Normal Across the Country.
    I came to this realization when I saw a patient in active miscarriage (bleeding, passing clots, cramping) who had just had an office visit with her primary physician. She was forced to wait more than 48 hours in order to get the results of her bloodwork. Doctors will sometimes check a patient’s levels of HCG, or human chorionic gonadotropin, to help distinguish miscarriages from ongoing pregnancies or ectopic pregnancies. I could not understand why someone with all of the clinical signs of a miscarriage in progress was required to wait for much-needed intervention, all the while bleeding and cramping and suffering.

    I was angry that the patient’s doctor did not just provide the standard medical treatment for a miscarriage: surgically removing the contents of her uterus, which would stop her pain and bleeding. Then I saw a different patient who was actively miscarrying, and a lightbulb clicked on: The doctors were afraid of being attacked by the state of Alabama.

    Medical providers who treat pregnancy-related issues in red states exist in a constant state of fear of performing any procedure that can be classified as an abortion—even while the procedures remain legal. We know that we face the risk of being prosecuted, having our licenses revoked, or even being thrown in jail if we fail to precisely follow every regulation, no matter how arcane or medically unnecessary it is. (We can be cited if the clinic’s janitor’s closet isn’t the size deemed appropriate by the state, for example.)
     
    • Winner Winner x 2
    • Agree Agree x 1
  18. gogator7444

    gogator7444 GC Hall of Fame

    3,051
    939
    1,858
    Nov 24, 2021
    Buffalo NY
    Oh I know. But the support laws start at birth. This person is saying if it's a person it should start/be retroactive to conception. Also in some states percentages are fine, in others it's a joke. Men will then quit their jobs & go work under the table & claim they make less than they do so they don't pay. And compliance is a joke in some places. How many adult kids are getting support that was owed for them that their moms didn't get? But the woman can't defer any of that or refuse. She has to do it or give up the kid.

    Just thought it was a good point.

    Also brings us to the point. That the government doesn't allow for support, tax deductions, insurance, etc until birth because it's not an actual PERSON until BIRTH. So can't have it both ways.
     
  19. citygator

    citygator VIP Member

    10,834
    2,442
    3,303
    Apr 3, 2007
    Charlotte
    We needed a shocked emoji. That’s crazy.
     
    • Agree Agree x 1